randylan2 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 (edited) I KNOW SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE V A REGS ON ONE DOCTOR REPORT VS ANOTHER I AM CURRENTLY SERVICE CONNECTED FOR BILATERAL TINNITUS. BACKGROUND: ACTIVE DUTY 1990 -RINGING IN EARS DOCUMENTED ON ACTIVE DUTY 2001- VETERANS PRIVATE DOC TREATS VET FOR RINGING IN EARS 2002-VETERAN FILES CLAIM FOR HEARING LOSS AND RINGING IN THE EARS FROM ACTIVE DUTY NOISE EXPOSURE 2002- VETERAN AWARDED SC FOR TINNITUS, CAUSED BY MILITARY NOISE EXPOSURE 2008- VETERAN LOST HEARING IN RIGHT EAR AND TINNITUS GETS WORSE ALONG WITH LEFT EAR HEARING LOSS 2008- VETERAN CLAIMS SECONDARY HEARING LOSS AND MANIERES DISEASE FROM SC TINNITUS 2009- INDEPENDANT MEDICAL OPINION - REPORTS VETERANS HEARING LOSS AND MENIRES CAUSED BY SC NOISE EXPOSURE NEG OPINIONS VETERAN AFFAIRS SENDS FILE TO DR AND THE DOCTOR REPORTED ALL HEARING LOSS IS SPONTANIOUS EVENT AND NOT SERVICE CONNECTED VETERANS AFFAIRS AUDIOLOGIST REPORTS HEARING LOSS IS A TYPICAL, NOT RELATED TO SERVICE POS EVEDENCE IN SUPPORT OF CLAIM 2009-IMO DR REPORTS HEARING LOSS MENIERES IS SC NOISE EXPOSURE FROM THE PAST 2009-2013 VETERAN IS TREATED BY PRIVATE ENT DOCTOR, THAT REPORTS THE HISTORY STARTING IN 1990 AND FOWARD SOUNDS CONSISTANT WITH MENIERES DISEASE. DR ALSO REPORTS IT IS MUCH MORE LIKELY THE LEFT EAR HEARING LOSS AND TINNITUS IS SERVICE CONNECTED AND THE RIGHT EAR MENIERES STABLE 2009 C@P EXAM DR REPORTS VETERANS MEDICAL FILES SHOW VETERAN HAS LONG TERM MILD HEARING LOSS SHOWN FROM PAST AUDIO EXAMS QUESTION IS, DOES THE RATER ONLY COUNT THE V A EVEDENCE OR DOES ONE REPORT OVERRIDE THE OTHER? FAR AS I KNOW V A ONLY HAS 2 REPORTS FOR EVEDENCE TO DENY BENEFITS WOULD SYMPTOTOLOGY OF SYMPTOMS ALONG WITH THE LAY STATEMENTS WORK FOR THE NEXUS ? WOULD REASONABLE DOUBT RULE APPLY TO THIS CLAIM? VA REGIONAL OFFICE DENIED CLAIM 2013- BVA REMANDS FILE DUE TO THE V A DOCTORS SPONTANIOUS EVENT OPENION WAS NOT EXPLAINED. AMC LETTER TELLS ME I CAN SEND ANY OTHER EVEDENCE AND THEY SENT FILES BACK TO THAT V A DOC TO WRITE EXPANATION OF HIS DIAGNOSES I WOULD THINK MY PRIVATE ENT DOCTOR WOULD HOLD UP MORE WEIGHT WITH ISSUES OF SYMPTOMS FOR MENIERES DISEASE AND BILATERAL HF HEARING LOSS. REPORTED. AMC WILL PUT FILE TOGEATHER AND RATE CLAIM....... DOES THIS EVEDENCE OF THE VETERAN HAVE A CHANCE ? ANY SUGGESTIONS ? YOU CAN ALSO EMAIL randylan2@hotmail.com, CLAIM IS NOW 5 YEARS OLD Edited October 20, 2013 by randylan2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
63SIERRA Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 THE MERE NOTING OF A CONDITION WHILE IN SERVICE HAS BEEN HELD TO CONSTITUTE PROOF OF SYMPTOMS. SYMPTOMS, NOT TREATMENT ARE THE ESSENCE OF CONTINUITY OF A DISABILITY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_spirit_etc Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 Did you say something? Think Outside the Box! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_spirit_etc Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 (edited) "THIS REGULATION ABOUT ONE MEDICAL REPORTS OUT WEIGHTS ANOTHER REPORT IS VERY CONFUSSING. ANYONE HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THAT RULE?" randylan2, It isn't so much that there is a rule where one medical report outweighs the other one, as that the VA gets to decide whether they consider a report to be probative. If they consider the evidence in favor of granting to be greater than the evidence against granting, the veteran wins. If they consider the evidence to be equally balanced, the veteran gets the benefit of the doubt. If they consider the evidence against the claim to be greater, the veteran is denied. Would it be possible for you to post: 1. Your IMO from your doctor. 2. The opinion from the VA examiner. 3. The last Statement of Case you received. 4. The BVA decision (that includes the remand). If you scan them - be sure to remove personal information. The BVA decision should tell you a lot about what they took into consideration. Did they give any reason they did not consider the private doctor's opinion probative enough to grant the claim? What did they say about his opinion? The denials and remands often give you the keys to winning - once you are able to show them what they say wasn't shown. Edited October 21, 2013 by free_spirit_etc Think Outside the Box! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shyne-I Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 63Sierra....Oh how I wish that was all it took!! I have had the same symptoms continually from time of service thru these 19 years; and continuity of symptomology has been the cruxes of my claim but it's the "VA-ness" that has led me to have to obtain an IMO and all other sorts of medical research to support my claim for Fibromyalgia!! Shyne-I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_spirit_etc Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 "THE MERE NOTING OF A CONDITION WHILE IN SERVICE HAS BEEN HELD TO CONSTITUTE PROOF OF SYMPTOMS. SYMPTOMS, NOT TREATMENT ARE THE ESSENCE OF CONTINUITY OF A DISABILITY" While that can sometimes be the case, do not count on it to win the claim. It is generally only once piece of the puzzle. Think Outside the Box! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berta Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 You have asked about one opinion weighed against another....Benefit of Doubt. If the vet has a strong IMO for the claim (prepared with regard to the IMO criteria here in our IMO forum) and a VA opinion against the claim, then Relative Equipoise (the Benefit of Doubt should kick in and the VA should award the claim. Free spirit asked you for exactly what info we need to see....... The VA is supposed to apply Fast Letter 10-35 to these types of claims. We cant tell if they did. "2013- BVA REMANDS FILE DUE TO THE V A DOCTORS SPONTANIOUS EVENT OPENION WAS NOT EXPLAINED. AMC LETTER TELLS ME I CAN SEND ANY OTHER EVEDENCE AND THEY SENT FILES BACK TO THAT V A DOC TO WRITE EXPANATION OF HIS DIAGNOSES I WOULD THINK MY PRIVATE ENT DOCTOR WOULD HOLD UP MORE WEIGHT WITH ISSUES OF SYMPTOMS FOR MENIERES DISEASE AND BILATERAL HF HEARING LOSS. REPORTED." Yes if he followed the IMO criteria here in our IMO forum. I sure hope he referred to your SMRs and/or your MOS in his opinion. I had 3 IMOs when the BVA remanded my AO DMII death claim for an additional opinion from a cardiologist. I jumped for joy because I knew a real cardio doc would support the claim. I jumped too soon, I found out a local PA from the Bath NY VAMC was doing the opinion. Then I jumped the gun too soon again and requested a cardio forensic IMO. BVA had 2 endocrinologist opinions my IMO doc knocked down but my VARO refused to read those opinions. I knocked down the PA opinion as it was too speculative, when in fact the evidence was clearly probative and the remand had requested a cardio opinion, not one from a PA. I awaited the forensic cardio IMO I had paid for ,so I could send it to the BVA right away and suddenly found a BVA envelope in my mail box. The BVA had agreed the PA opinion was too speculative and that my 3 IMOs outweighed their C & P examiners reports. I called the Cardio forensic people right away and my IMO had not been prepared yet but they refunded me about a thousand of the IMO fee I had paid, which was more then fair of them. The BVA often orders additional C & P exams. After they get those results, that is when they weigh all of the evidence. I was thinkling for some reason in those days, that the BVA was on a 'fishing expedidition' what we hardcore advocates and claimants used to call the BVA tactics prior to the VCAA. But they were not doing that. Even if the PA opinion somehow had gone against my claim with a strong medical rationale , it was still 3 IMOs for and 3 against. BVA said y claim was 'at least in relative equipoise/ meaning benefit of doubt was rendered in my favor. We have discussed Benefit of Doubt (Relative Equipoise here many times, even recently.Those posts can be searched here for. If you give us the BVA Citation and Docket number we can pull up that link right away..... As free spirit said, those BVA remands often hold keys to success....... If one is on remand and they have additional evidence, I advise to send copy to their VARO but more importantly directly to the BVA and then after a week or so call or email the BVA Ombudsman to make sure the BVA has received it. GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University ! When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we." Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
randylan2
I KNOW SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE V A REGS ON ONE DOCTOR REPORT VS ANOTHER
I AM CURRENTLY SERVICE CONNECTED FOR BILATERAL TINNITUS. BACKGROUND:
ACTIVE DUTY 1990 -RINGING IN EARS DOCUMENTED ON ACTIVE DUTY
2001- VETERANS PRIVATE DOC TREATS VET FOR RINGING IN EARS
2002-VETERAN FILES CLAIM FOR HEARING LOSS AND RINGING IN THE EARS FROM ACTIVE DUTY NOISE EXPOSURE
2002- VETERAN AWARDED SC FOR TINNITUS, CAUSED BY MILITARY NOISE EXPOSURE
2008- VETERAN LOST HEARING IN RIGHT EAR AND TINNITUS GETS WORSE ALONG WITH LEFT EAR HEARING LOSS
2008- VETERAN CLAIMS SECONDARY HEARING LOSS AND MANIERES DISEASE FROM SC TINNITUS
2009- INDEPENDANT MEDICAL OPINION - REPORTS VETERANS HEARING LOSS AND MENIRES CAUSED BY SC NOISE EXPOSURE
NEG OPINIONS
VETERAN AFFAIRS SENDS FILE TO DR AND THE DOCTOR REPORTED ALL HEARING LOSS IS SPONTANIOUS EVENT AND NOT SERVICE CONNECTED
VETERANS AFFAIRS AUDIOLOGIST REPORTS HEARING LOSS IS A TYPICAL, NOT RELATED TO SERVICE
POS EVEDENCE IN SUPPORT OF CLAIM
2009-IMO DR REPORTS HEARING LOSS MENIERES IS SC NOISE EXPOSURE FROM THE PAST
2009-2013 VETERAN IS TREATED BY PRIVATE ENT DOCTOR, THAT REPORTS THE HISTORY STARTING IN 1990 AND FOWARD SOUNDS CONSISTANT WITH MENIERES DISEASE.
DR ALSO REPORTS IT IS MUCH MORE LIKELY THE LEFT EAR HEARING LOSS AND TINNITUS IS SERVICE CONNECTED
AND THE RIGHT EAR MENIERES STABLE
2009 C@P EXAM DR REPORTS VETERANS MEDICAL FILES SHOW VETERAN HAS LONG TERM MILD HEARING LOSS SHOWN FROM PAST AUDIO EXAMS
QUESTION IS, DOES THE RATER ONLY COUNT THE V A EVEDENCE OR DOES ONE REPORT OVERRIDE THE OTHER?
FAR AS I KNOW V A ONLY HAS 2 REPORTS FOR EVEDENCE TO DENY BENEFITS
WOULD SYMPTOTOLOGY OF SYMPTOMS ALONG WITH THE LAY STATEMENTS WORK FOR THE NEXUS ?
WOULD REASONABLE DOUBT RULE APPLY TO THIS CLAIM?
VA REGIONAL OFFICE DENIED CLAIM
2013- BVA REMANDS FILE DUE TO THE V A DOCTORS SPONTANIOUS EVENT OPENION WAS NOT EXPLAINED.
AMC LETTER TELLS ME I CAN SEND ANY OTHER EVEDENCE AND THEY SENT FILES BACK TO THAT V A DOC TO WRITE EXPANATION OF HIS DIAGNOSES
I WOULD THINK MY PRIVATE ENT DOCTOR WOULD HOLD UP MORE WEIGHT WITH ISSUES OF SYMPTOMS FOR MENIERES DISEASE AND BILATERAL HF
HEARING LOSS. REPORTED.
AMC WILL PUT FILE TOGEATHER AND RATE CLAIM.......
DOES THIS EVEDENCE OF THE VETERAN HAVE A CHANCE ?
ANY SUGGESTIONS ?
YOU CAN ALSO EMAIL
randylan2@hotmail.com,
CLAIM IS NOW 5 YEARS OLD
Edited by randylan2Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
7
3
2
1
Popular Days
Oct 20
7
Oct 21
7
Top Posters For This Question
free_spirit_etc 7 posts
randylan2 3 posts
Berta 2 posts
63SIERRA 1 post
Popular Days
Oct 20 2013
7 posts
Oct 21 2013
7 posts
13 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now