HadIt.com Elder Philip Rogers Posted January 20, 2014 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted January 20, 2014 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/16/pirkl-v-shinseki-back-to-the-future-cue/pr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 carlie Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/16/pirkl-v-shinseki-back-to-the-future-cue/ pr That's asknod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 HadIt.com Elder Philip Rogers Posted January 21, 2014 Author HadIt.com Elder Share Posted January 21, 2014 That's asknod.Carlie - who's asknod, the writer, Gordon "Alex" Graham or Pirkl, the claimant??pr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 carlie Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Carlie - who's asknod, the writer, Gordon "Alex" Graham or Pirkl, the claimant?? pr The author / writer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 HadIt.com Elder Philip Rogers Posted January 21, 2014 Author HadIt.com Elder Share Posted January 21, 2014 Thanks, Carlie! I've been reading his stuff, there. Most excellent!!!pr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Berta Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Thanks PR...a fabulous article! Ken Carpenter got well deserved Kudos in it and the writer ( the SVR guest tomorrow!!!!) ASKNOD, made this point: “For some inexplicable reason, VA never seems to find that the manifestly different outcome transpired. Go figure. Or don’t. Such are the vagaries of ex parte justice.” That is why some of us CUErinos have to hold their hands on that point and clearly state exactly how the established medical evidence they had at time of the alleged CUE, definitely had manifested an erroneous outcome,when the VA rendered the first decision. Any decision being CUED often contains clues as to what the manifested outcome should have been and usually the evidence list and the extremely important Rating sheet can hold the very essence of the CUE. If no clues are apparent in the decision than it pays to study the regs that controlled the claim ,the regs in existence at time of the alleged CUE, to see if the VA misapplied them. It can be done! (and to add ...regarding my SMC CUE, some of the evidence had been established by VA General Counsel. But my RO ,when they made the decision I Cued, acted like much of that evidence didn't exist. The established medical evidence can be anywhere at the VA,if not physically at the RO.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 carlie Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 I'd like to add something to the effect of the established law they broke in committing the cue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Philip Rogers
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/16/pirkl-v-shinseki-back-to-the-future-cue/
pr
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
3
1
Popular Days
Jan 21
5
Jan 20
2
Top Posters For This Question
carlie 3 posts
Philip Rogers 3 posts
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 21 2014
5 posts
Jan 20 2014
2 posts
6 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now