I have had 2 C&P exams in the past 9 months. The first was somewhat in my favor but the second basically stated that every issue the examiner found in the first exam was now miraculously fine. After seeing this second exam, I went through my record and found that the examiner, who never actually performed an exam, was just copying and pasting notes from my VA medical record and using this as a basis for their findings. I also found that my condition was not being properly documented in my record. Verbally, my doc would tell me my condition was "moderate to severe" but in my record it was being notated as "mild". I addressed this issue with my doctor, who was kind enough to pen me a detailed letter describing the "true" nature of my illness and supporting my claim. So my question is, does this copy paste job of the C&P examiner carry more weight than a letter from my doctor who has treated me for the past 6 years? Their findings are in total contrast of each other. C&P examiner states my condition is "mild" and my doctors letter states it is "severe". He also goes in to more detail as to my limitations and how the frequency of my required treatments creates great limitations on my life. Let me know your thoughts.
Question
magnolia_318
I have had 2 C&P exams in the past 9 months. The first was somewhat in my favor but the second basically stated that every issue the examiner found in the first exam was now miraculously fine. After seeing this second exam, I went through my record and found that the examiner, who never actually performed an exam, was just copying and pasting notes from my VA medical record and using this as a basis for their findings. I also found that my condition was not being properly documented in my record. Verbally, my doc would tell me my condition was "moderate to severe" but in my record it was being notated as "mild". I addressed this issue with my doctor, who was kind enough to pen me a detailed letter describing the "true" nature of my illness and supporting my claim. So my question is, does this copy paste job of the C&P examiner carry more weight than a letter from my doctor who has treated me for the past 6 years? Their findings are in total contrast of each other. C&P examiner states my condition is "mild" and my doctors letter states it is "severe". He also goes in to more detail as to my limitations and how the frequency of my required treatments creates great limitations on my life. Let me know your thoughts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
2
2
1
Popular Days
Apr 25
5
Apr 23
3
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 2 posts
magnolia_318 2 posts
Buck52 2 posts
free_spirit_etc 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 25 2015
5 posts
Apr 23 2015
3 posts
Popular Posts
Berta
Myasthenia gravis is presumptive as a chronic disability, if symtomatic to at least 10% within one year after discharge>. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.309 "I was given 2 C&P exa
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now