Filed Claim 1999- Va Denied 2000- Reson Denied: No evidence of to indicate that condition was incurred in service; no service treatment Records and no evidence treatment shortly after separation-Did not appeal and Became Final
Refiled 2003-Va received a few service treatment records-but doess not list them in there 2004 decision, which again denied the claim for the same reason as 2000 decision. I filed a NOD and sent them copies of the two in service treatment records that supported my claim. VA sent me an SOC which acknowledged the in service treatment, but stated that no chronic diagnosis was mentioned. Unfortunately, I wasn´t smart and let this on go final as well.. I KNOW!!!!
Refiled 2005- this time I submitted Nexus and the 2 in service treatment records, and buddy statement. Claim sat for two years after the VCAA notice, then denied in 2008. Reason: While nexus was new, it was not material. Denied for same reason used in 2000.
Submitted NOD within one year of 2005 decision. Waited and waited and finally received a statement of the case in 2008 which continued to deny claim. Va again listed the 2 in service treatment records in the evidence section.
Submitted VA form 9 in 2008 with Statement from Nurse wife and Dr. addendum to nexus that really detailed the facts in date order with very good rationale.
Claim certified to BVA in 2010.
Waited and waited. Early 2013 received a supplemental SOC stating that claim was awarded with an effective date of 2005. In the decison it states "although the majority of service treatment records are unavailable, one service treatment records, dated May 1997 has been associated with the claims file and reveals that the bveteran was seen for a possiblestrained muscle x 3 days. The impression was noted as lower quadrant (abdomen) and the veteran was limited to no lifting over 10 pounds. The veteran has clarified that he sought treatment in 1997 for both pain in back and abdomen. We find that this evidence weighs in favor of the Veterans contention that he sustained a back injury in service" The dececision also mentions the second in service treatment record as being weighed favorably and supports my contention.
The SSOC also mentioned the 2 in service treatment records when discussing the favorable Doctor nexus.
What I am concerned about is that, while the first decision in 2000 did not mention the 2 in service treatment records, they were mentioned in a denied decision prior to the claim that was awarded in 2013.
Please let me know if you think this has a chance for an earlier efffective date.
Question
add55p
All
Can you assist me in determine if an earlier effective date claim should be considered based on the following scenerio. I am alittle confused because 38 C.F.R. § 3.156© provides that “if the VA receives or associates with the claims file relevant service department records at any time after the VA first decides the claim, the VA will reconsider the claim, including the issue of awarding an effective date back to filing of the original claim.
Scenerio:
Filed Claim 1999- Va Denied 2000- Reson Denied: No evidence of to indicate that condition was incurred in service; no service treatment Records and no evidence treatment shortly after separation-Did not appeal and Became Final
Refiled 2003-Va received a few service treatment records-but doess not list them in there 2004 decision, which again denied the claim for the same reason as 2000 decision. I filed a NOD and sent them copies of the two in service treatment records that supported my claim. VA sent me an SOC which acknowledged the in service treatment, but stated that no chronic diagnosis was mentioned. Unfortunately, I wasn´t smart and let this on go final as well.. I KNOW!!!!
Refiled 2005- this time I submitted Nexus and the 2 in service treatment records, and buddy statement. Claim sat for two years after the VCAA notice, then denied in 2008. Reason: While nexus was new, it was not material. Denied for same reason used in 2000.
Submitted NOD within one year of 2005 decision. Waited and waited and finally received a statement of the case in 2008 which continued to deny claim. Va again listed the 2 in service treatment records in the evidence section.
Submitted VA form 9 in 2008 with Statement from Nurse wife and Dr. addendum to nexus that really detailed the facts in date order with very good rationale.
Claim certified to BVA in 2010.
Waited and waited. Early 2013 received a supplemental SOC stating that claim was awarded with an effective date of 2005. In the decison it states "although the majority of service treatment records are unavailable, one service treatment records, dated May 1997 has been associated with the claims file and reveals that the bveteran was seen for a possiblestrained muscle x 3 days. The impression was noted as lower quadrant (abdomen) and the veteran was limited to no lifting over 10 pounds. The veteran has clarified that he sought treatment in 1997 for both pain in back and abdomen. We find that this evidence weighs in favor of the Veterans contention that he sustained a back injury in service" The dececision also mentions the second in service treatment record as being weighed favorably and supports my contention.
The SSOC also mentioned the 2 in service treatment records when discussing the favorable Doctor nexus.
What I am concerned about is that, while the first decision in 2000 did not mention the 2 in service treatment records, they were mentioned in a denied decision prior to the claim that was awarded in 2013.
Please let me know if you think this has a chance for an earlier efffective date.
Thank you..
Add
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
5
3
1
Popular Days
Apr 30
9
Top Posters For This Question
add55p 5 posts
broncovet 3 posts
Gastone 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 30 2015
9 posts
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now