Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
Question About My Hearing C&p Exam
Rate this question
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
2025 VA Disability Compensation Rates an Pay Dates
Tbird posted a question in VA Disability Claims Research,
Picked By
Tbird, -
VA Disability Claims: 5 Game-Changing Precedential Decisions You Need to Know
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
Rating Issues
Continue Reading on HadIt.com-
- 1 review
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Are all military medical records on file at the VA?
RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.-
- 4 replies
Picked By
RichardZ, -
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 reviews
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Question
Smirak
I had my C&P exam for hearing loss/tinnitus back on June 3. I just now got my notes in myhealthevet last week. I was looking over the notes just because (I've already been rated at combined 90%) and the hearing one was peculiar. I was denied any hearing loss though the notes clearly state the below...notice that according to the C&P examiner, my right ear hearing loss didn't exist prior to service, but my left ear did? Also, for my left ear, it say that my left ear hearing loss "...is at least as likely as not (50% probability or greater) caused by or a result of an event in military service? Yes", though it existed prior to service?
Below is the C&P exam notes from my hearing test. Just looking to see if you think it's screwed up and to see what my recourse is if so. I was awarded on 11 Jun.
Thanks,
Kevin
Hearing Loss and Tinnitus
Disability Benefits Questionnaire
Name of patient/Veteran: [Veterans Name]
Indicate method used to obtain medical information to complete this
document:
In-person examination
Evidence review
---------------
Was the Veteran's VA claims file reviewed: No
Record(s) Reviewed: Other: Veteran's electronic folder in VBMS
This exam is for: Hearing loss and/or tinnitus (audiologist, performing
current exam)
SECTION 1: HEARING LOSS (HL)
-----------------------------
1. Objective Findings
---------------------
a. Puretone thresholds in decibels (air conduction):
RIGHT EAR
+==============================================================+
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|========+========+========+========+========+========+========+========+
| 500 | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 | 6000 | 8000 | Avg Hz |
| Hz* | Hz | Hz | Hz | Hz | Hz | Hz | (B-E)**|
|========+========+========+========+========+========+========+========|
| 15 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 15 |
+=======================================================================+
LEFT EAR
+==============================================================+
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|========+========+========+========+========+========+========+========+
| 500 | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 | 6000 | 8000 | Avg Hz |
| Hz* | Hz | Hz | Hz | Hz | Hz | Hz | (B-E)**|
|========+========+========+========+========+========+========+========|
| 10 | 15 | 10 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 18 |
+=======================================================================+
* The puretone threshold at 500 Hz is not used in determining the
evaluation but is used in determining whether or not a ratable hearing
loss exists.
** The average of B, C, D, and E.
*** CNT - Could Not Test
b. Were there one or more frequency(ies) that could not be tested: No
c. Validity of puretone test results: Test results are valid for rating
purposes.
d. Speech Discrimination Score (Maryland CNC word list):
+=======================+
| RIGHT EAR | 96% |
|=============+=========|
| LEFT EAR | 96% |
+=======================+
e. Appropriateness of Use of Word Recognition Score (Maryland CNC word
list):
Right Ear:
Is Word Discrimination Score available? Yes
Word Discrimination Score appropriateness:
Use of word recognition score is appropriate for this Veteran.
Left Ear:
Is Word Discrimination Score available? Yes
Word Discrimination Score appropriateness:
Use of word recognition score is appropriate for this Veteran.
f. Audiologic Findings
Summary of Immittance (Tympanometry) Findings:
+=============================================================================+
| | RIGHT EAR | LEFT EAR
|
|=====================+===========================+===========================|
| Acoustic immittance | [X] Normal [ ] Abnormal | [X] Normal [ ] Abnormal
|
|=====================+===========================+===========================|
| Ipsilateral | |
|
| Acoustic Reflexes | [ ] Normal [X] Abnormal | [ ] Normal [X] Abnormal
|
|=====================+===========================+===========================|
| Contralateral | |
|
| Acoustic Reflexes | [ ] Normal [X] Abnormal | [ ] Normal [X] Abnormal
|
|=====================+===========================+===========================|
| Unable to interpret | |
|
| reflexes due to | [ ] | [ ]
|
| artifact | |
|
|=====================+===========================+===========================|
| Unable to obtain/ | |
|
| maintain seal | [ ] | [ ]
|
+=============================================================================+
2. Diagnosis
------------
RIGHT EAR
---------
[ ] Normal hearing
[ ] Conductive hearing loss ICD code:
[ ] Mixed hearing loss ICD code:
[ ] Sensorineural hearing loss (in the frequency range of 500-4000 Hz)*
ICD code:
[ ] Sensorineural hearing loss (in the frequency range of 6000 Hz or
higher frequencies)** ICD code:
[X] Significant changes in hearing thresholds in service***
LEFT EAR
--------
[ ] Normal hearing
[ ] Conductive hearing loss ICD code:
[ ] Mixed hearing loss ICD code:
[ ] Sensorineural hearing loss (in the frequency range of 500-4000 Hz)*
ICD code:
[ ] Sensorineural hearing loss (in the frequency range of 6000 Hz or
higher frequencies)** ICD code:
[X] Significant changes in hearing thresholds in service***
NOTES:
* The Veteran may have hearing loss at a level that is not considered to
be
a disability for VA purposes. This can occur when the auditory
thresholds are greater than 25 dB at one or more frequencies in the
500-4000 Hz range.
** The Veteran may have impaired hearing, but it does not meet the criteria
to be considered a disability for VA purposes. For VA purposes, the
diagnosis of hearing impairment is based upon testing at frequency
ranges
of 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz. If there is no HL in the
500-4000
Hz range, but there is HL above 4000 Hz, check this box.
*** The Veteran may have a significant change in hearing threshold in
service, but it does not meet the criteria to be considered a disability
for VA purposes. (A significant change in hearing threshold may
indicate
noise exposure or acoustic trauma.)
3. Etiology
-----------
Right Ear
Was there a permanent positive threshold shift (worse than reference
threshold) greater than normal measurement variability at any frequency
between 500 and 6000 Hz for the right ear? Yes
Opinion provided for the right ear: Yes
If present, is the Veteran's right ear hearing loss at least as likely as
not (50% probability or greater) caused by or a result of an event in
military service? Yes
Rationale (Provide rationale for either a yes, no answer or speculation
reason): The Veteran reporte
d the following military service history:
~Army April 1993-April 1996; infantryman; gunner on a Bradley fighting
vehicle; reported use of double hearing protection; reported onset of
tinnitus during this time; deployed to Somalia October 1993-February
1994 as a line infantryman with reported use of ear plugs as hearing
protection
~US Army Reserves June 1996-February 1997; drilling reservist
~Army National Guard February 2997-November 1998; personnel with a
field
artillery unit; significant noise with hearing protection from 155mm
howizter fire when training
~Active Duty Army National Guard November 2008-October 2004; 2008-2002
personnel without any significant noise exposure; March 2002-October
2004 supply sergeant with an MP battalion; deployed to Iraq September
2003-October 2004; was a supply sergeant in Iraq assigned to convoy
security and prison detail; reported he did convoy security twice a day
every other day and was in the gunner's hatch manning one of the
following weapons - .50 caliber machine gun, MK19 grenade launcher or
M240 Bravo; reported significant noise without hearing protection from
the firing of those weapons and the M16 and 9mm pistol he carried and
from vehicles, rocket attacks and IEDs
~Air National Guard April 2005-June 2012; Veteran reported he was
discharged completely in March 2014; April 2005-January 2007 drilling
guard member; January 2007-May 2008 activated in support of OEF, but
stationed in Mississippi; aerial port duty which involved the loading
and unloading of aircraft (C17s, C130s, C141s, C5s and various
commercial aircraft) 60% of the time with engines shut down and 40% of
the time with the engines running; Veteran reported wearing hearing
protection; May 2008-July 2009 went back to drilling but doing aerial
port duty; July 2009-June 2012, supply with no reported noise exposure
Eight pure tone threshold hearing tests were located in the service
treatment records (3-19-93, Army enlistment; 7-15-93, reference
audiogram; 1-25-96; 4-11-96; 4-12-97; 3-23-02; 7-11-08 and 4-4-09).
All
except the 4-11-96 test showed hearing acuity to be within normal
limits
bilaterally. The 4-11-96 test indicated a mild hearing loss in both
ears at most frequencies. No tests after 2009 were found in the
records. The results from this C&P exam indicate hearing acuity is
within normal limits bilaterally, but in compared these thresholds to
those from the Veteran's first enlistment test in March 1993, a
significant threshold shift (>10dB) is indicated at 1000 and 3000 Hz,
right ear and 1000, 3000 and 4000 Hz, left ear.
The Veteran denied any occupational noise exposure. While in the
Reserves and Guard he reported he attended college and worked in
retail.
Since leaving the service he reported he sold real estate and has
worked for a year as a purchasing manager. He denied ear surgery,
recent/chronic ear infections, head injury, familial hearing loss and
treatment with chemotherapy/radiation. He denied vertigo, but reported
occasional disequilibrium. He denied any significant recreational noise
exposure other than hunting occasional in childhood with hearing
protection.
The current testing indicates the Veteran's hearing acuity is within
normal limits bilaterally, but when compared his first enlistment
hearing test in 1993 to the current exam, a significant threshold shift
is indicated in both ears. Given the indirect evidence (MOS, combat
duty, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Veteran report) of
significant military noise exposure and the lack of any reported
occupational or significant recreational noise exposure, in my opinion,
the threshold shifts are at least as likely as not related to military
noise exposure.
Did hearing loss exist prior to service? No
Left Ear
Was there a permanent positive threshold shift (worse than reference
threshold) greater than normal measurement variability at any frequency
between 500 and 6000 Hz for the left ear? Yes
Opinion provided for the left ear: Yes
If present, is the Veteran's left ear hearing loss at least as likely as
not (50% probability or greater) caused by or a result of an event in
military service? Yes
Rationale (Provide rationale for either a yes, no answer or speculation
reason): see rationale for right ear above
Did hearing loss exist prior to service? Yes
4. Functional impact of hearing loss
Edited by Tbird------------------------------------
Does the Veteran's hearing loss impact ordinary conditions of daily life,
including ability to work: Yes
If yes, describe impact in the Veteran's own words: The Veteran stated "If
someone is speaking low I have to lean in and ask them what they said" and
"I can't hear my wife calling me from another room like I used to be able
to."
5. Remarks, if any, pertaining to hearing loss:
-----------------------------------------------
Otoscopy was unremarkable bilaterally. Tympanometry indicated normal
middle ear compliance and air pressure and a normal ear canal volume
bilaterally. Acoustic reflex thresholds could not be measured due to the
inability to maintain a pressure seal. Pure tone air and bone conduction
thresholds indicated hearing acuity is within normal limits bilaterally.
�R�e�m�o�v�e�d� �P�e�r�s�o�n�a�l� �I�d�e�n�t�i�f�i�c�a�t�i�o�n� �I�n�f�o�r�m�a�t�i�o�n
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
1
Popular Days
Jul 6
4
Top Posters For This Question
Smirak 2 posts
broncovet 1 post
boomer2 1 post
Popular Days
Jul 6 2015
4 posts
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now