I thought I would help explain a little about VARO errors, as they often follow patterns:
1. The VARO must give a "reasons and bases" for its decisions, or else it is error. I recommend, if you have favorable evidence if your evidence is not listed in the decisions "evidence" section, that you appeal it on that bases. If your pertinent evidence was not considered, then you can ask to reopen under 3.156 based on the "new" evidnece.
If there is favorable evidence in your file, and VA denied it anyway, and did not mention this favorable evidence, you can appeal on the bases that you had favorable evidence and the VA did not give a reasons and bases as to why this evidence was not considered.
2. Issues "reasonably raised" by the record, but not adjuticated. This is error, but the VA wont do anything about it, usually, unless YOU bring it up.
3. Compliance with "notice" and other regulations. Just because the decision "says" they complied with a particular regulation does not always mean they complied. Read over the regulation and see if they really did comply.
4. Not rating you on criteria. My first denial was on hearing loss because "it was too long since military service". This is not one of the rating criteria for service connection or hearing loss. If VA lists a denial based on non critieria, nail them on it. They can not say, "Im denying the Veteran because he wears purple spiked hair". This is not the criteria. Look it up and make sure they give a "reason" as to why you did not meet one or more of the criteria in the denial. Many/Most BVA decisions say,
"The criteria for xxxx has (or has not) been met. You meet the critieria, you get the award. If you dont meet the criteria, then they need to explain why you did not meet the applicable criteria.
5. Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence. Let me explain. If your cfile says "nothing" about your condition, this does not mean you do not have the condition. There could be many reasons why your file has nothing in it about your malady, the most common of which is that the VA can not find the evidence or does not have it. Now, "evidence of absence" is a valid reason for denial. If you go to the doctor, and he xrays you, and he says, "No, the xray is negative for any sign of DDD", now this is a valid denial reason. Its negative evidence or "evidence you dont have DDD". It is not the same thing as there is NO xray. Dont let them do this. If the VA has "negative evidence" then let them cite the medical report where the doc did a test which came up negative. You can deal with this with an IME/IMO. But, just because there is nothing in your record about DDD or xrays, this does not mean you dont have DDD. It means your records are probably incomplete, if you have taken these tests, or, if you have not taken the tests, then you should be given a C and P exam.
Question
broncovet
I thought I would help explain a little about VARO errors, as they often follow patterns:
1. The VARO must give a "reasons and bases" for its decisions, or else it is error. I recommend, if you have favorable evidence if your evidence is not listed in the decisions "evidence" section, that you appeal it on that bases. If your pertinent evidence was not considered, then you can ask to reopen under 3.156 based on the "new" evidnece.
If there is favorable evidence in your file, and VA denied it anyway, and did not mention this favorable evidence, you can appeal on the bases that you had favorable evidence and the VA did not give a reasons and bases as to why this evidence was not considered.
2. Issues "reasonably raised" by the record, but not adjuticated. This is error, but the VA wont do anything about it, usually, unless YOU bring it up.
3. Compliance with "notice" and other regulations. Just because the decision "says" they complied with a particular regulation does not always mean they complied. Read over the regulation and see if they really did comply.
4. Not rating you on criteria. My first denial was on hearing loss because "it was too long since military service". This is not one of the rating criteria for service connection or hearing loss. If VA lists a denial based on non critieria, nail them on it. They can not say, "Im denying the Veteran because he wears purple spiked hair". This is not the criteria. Look it up and make sure they give a "reason" as to why you did not meet one or more of the criteria in the denial. Many/Most BVA decisions say,
"The criteria for xxxx has (or has not) been met. You meet the critieria, you get the award. If you dont meet the criteria, then they need to explain why you did not meet the applicable criteria.
5. Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence. Let me explain. If your cfile says "nothing" about your condition, this does not mean you do not have the condition. There could be many reasons why your file has nothing in it about your malady, the most common of which is that the VA can not find the evidence or does not have it. Now, "evidence of absence" is a valid reason for denial. If you go to the doctor, and he xrays you, and he says, "No, the xray is negative for any sign of DDD", now this is a valid denial reason. Its negative evidence or "evidence you dont have DDD". It is not the same thing as there is NO xray. Dont let them do this. If the VA has "negative evidence" then let them cite the medical report where the doc did a test which came up negative. You can deal with this with an IME/IMO. But, just because there is nothing in your record about DDD or xrays, this does not mean you dont have DDD. It means your records are probably incomplete, if you have taken these tests, or, if you have not taken the tests, then you should be given a C and P exam.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
1
Popular Days
Jul 29
4
Jul 30
4
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 2 posts
Vync 1 post
turtle5252 1 post
Popular Days
Jul 29 2015
4 posts
Jul 30 2015
4 posts
Popular Posts
broncovet
I thought I would help explain a little about VARO errors, as they often follow patterns: 1. The VARO must give a "reasons and bases" for its decisions, or else it is error. I recommend, if you
Guest
Bronco, I can follow your point but some veterans would just give up and say the heck with it or some veterans would file an NOD or a request for reconsideration/reopen claim and if VA grants the NOD
broncovet
Vync. I agree. Berta often says VA can not read. I think they "top sheet" these, and read the first 2 pages then issue a decision. Turtle: With hearing loss there are 2 issues: First, is i
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now