Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

TBI vets scammed by VA

Rate this question


Berta

Question

"VA issued a statement following exposure of a scam at Minneapolis VA where unqualified doctors were posing as qualified doctors and denying claims for traumatic brain injury. In a statement, VA claims it “greatly regrets” having unqualified doctors misdiagnose brain injury.

This is a follow up story from KARE 11 NBC about a brain injury scandal I uncovered being committed at the facility. Veterans seeking service connection for traumatic brain injury (TBI) residuals were not receiving exams from qualified doctors despite clear guidelines to not do that.

RELATED: VA Caught Defrauding 300 Veterans With Brain Injuries

The story is unfolding across the nation and reporter AJ Lagoe is chasing down leads to expose this national scandal. In Minnesota (through the Minneapolis VA.

Source: www.disabledvets.org (Ben Krause's site)

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

One would think that, in a non adversarial atmosphere, if you would provide the VA with a board certified specialists opinion, that they would have no need to pursue an opinion of any other provider, as long as the opinion is not blatantly fraudulent.

With the experience that millions of claims tying injuries to benefit conclusions provides, it is fairly simple to come to a conclusion that xx in a military record doing xx after discharge over a specific time frame is a reasonable claim that should not require an elevated level of investigation if there is already a quality opinion on the issue in hand.

When the RO goes shopping for opposing opinions, the non adversarial nature of the claim is removed.  I would suppose that this same tactic is used over other issues as well, seeing that such a high number of appeals succeed after initial rating denials.

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use