Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Am I elegible for 100% temp for TKR

Rate this question


mtmorical

Question

In another post I had tons of questions regarding my claim and the TKR! Thanks all those who helped! I hope I put this one in the right topic!

I was told to go to my VA and get copies of my clinic visits and my surgical reports, which I did yesterday! I have a couple questions/concerns that I fear may make me ineligible.

Clinic Notes:

Several times it was mentioned that I wanted the TKR on my right knee (fact), I was concerned about this until you get to the clinic note where we met with the surgeon and he stated "Mr XX wants the surgery for fancy word for TKR, given the state of advanced end stage degenerative arthritis, and his young age I agree and that the TKR is the best chance of improvement, Mr XXX will also require TKR on his left knee in near future."  

Will the fact that I stated I want the TKR become an issue?

Also, in the progress notes it states "residuals from previous ACL repair" are they saying that my knee needed a TKR because of the ACL repair? That happened prior to the military and I received a waiver with MRI that showed NO signs of degenerative arthritis or degenerative joint disease.

Finally they also did MRI's on my back, and now they are saying I have DJD in that area as well. Can I get that connected to my right knee which is SC? Can I get my left knee SC do to favoring my right knee for so long it affected my walk?

Below are some notes about my knee, please let me know any input you have or if you need additional information, I have it all in from of me.

Progress Notes:

Impression:

Residuals from previous ACL repair.

Significant increase of degenerative changes involving the right knee complex since 12/2003 (last review)

Surgical Notes:

Preoperative Diagnosis:

1) Right knee end-stage degerative joing disease.

2) Prior ACL reconstructions, right knee.

Same notes for posoperative.

Radiology Reports:

Large suprapateller effusion progressed since prior MRI, soft tissue of ligamentous injury cannot be excluded.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1
  • Lead Moderator

Just add up how much money it will cost you by delaying filing for dependents, your other knee etc.  

It may be hard to figure out, as you dont know for sure, what the percentages will be.  

How long do you want to wait to get paid?  The earlier you apply, the earlier you will get benefits.  

Better is to file now, and, if you are simply overwhelmed with "too much money" unable to spend it all, then donate a portion of it to hadit and Tbird to continue the site.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

1. The surgeon cannot perform the surgery without your permission.

2. You said you are already SC for the knee.  

3.  The condition apparently worsened and warrants a TKR.

4.  Doctors dont perform unnecessary TKR's.  They are a radical step, irreversable, and they dont want to get sued for performing unnecessary surgery.  

5.  You are doing the right thing.  Be prepared.  Now, research BVA/ CAVC cases.  You can type in "Elective TKR" and see what pops up.  I would rather teach you how to do that, than to do that for you.  REad the applicable cases.  

6.  After you have done all this, stop worrying.  VA uses fear as a tactic, to keep us from applying for additional benefits we deserve.  Dont fall for their scare tactics.  

7.  Include, in you PPPPP (Proper Preperation Prevents Poor Performance), a backup plan.  That is, cut back your expenses now, preparing for a longer wait than expected.  VA claims almost always take longer than expected.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you for your response! I have looked at cases and seems as though most cases similar the Vet won, there is obvious change in the condition after service which warranted the SC to 10% I have now. That helps me alot to know that. 

I did also read where there have been cases that the surgery temp 100% was denied because it was caused by factors outside of the SC.

If they are saying its because of the ACL  surgery then they never should of allowed me to serve because that was in High School.

Once my open claim for temp 100% is closed I will add my dependents and I will do a new claim for my increase on my right knee, having my lower back and left knee to be connect to my right knee right? (or do I want til after the covelance period) 

I dont neccessarily want to "milk" the VA for all the disabilities because they are not disabilities right now, I manage through the pain, and as soon as I can get my doctor to let me go back to work I will. I just want to make sure my basis are covered for future problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Many of us utilize the experience of hadit vs a VSO.  Hadit volunteers do not profit one penny on whether you take our advice or not.  We provide a service exclusively to give back to Veterans.  

The VA does not provide us with free rent in a VAMC or VARO, like what happens with VSO's.  Instead, all hadit volunteers rely on paying their own rent, or on owning our own home.  I am aware of not a single hadit volunteer who has been offered free rent by VA.  

Our boss does not collect a 350,000 per year salary for adherence to VA policies and procedures, like the VSO bosses do.  

If you are in a dispute with your neighbor, think long and hard before  take the advice of an attorney your adversary picks out for you and pays the bill for you.  Be especially wary when your adversary pretends to be your friend by saying things like, "we are a pro Veteran, claimant friendly organization."   Or, "We are with the VA and here to help you so you need to trust us".

Remember, the VA exists as a very generous welfare system for its own employees.     

For the reasons, above, and for still more "first hand experience" of what VSO's do, I elect to be represented by an attorney of my choosing, or go pro se.  

However, I recognize that not everyone is in my situation, and they may well come up with a different solution than the one I came up for my family.  

The importance of your selection of a representative to your outcome can not be overstated.  Choose wisely, and ask lots of questions.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use