Jump to content
Using an Ad Blocker? Consider adding HadIt.com as an exception. Hadit.com is funded through advertising, ad free memberships, contributions and out of pocket. ×
  • 0

Rating increased to 50%


Tazinhawaii

Question

So the VA just awarded my claim for GERD at 10% which increased my overall to 50%.  I'm retired Navy so this means the Gov't will stop robbing my retired pay, YEAH!!  But I'm confused on how far back my back pay will be.  I submitted my intent to file via e-benifits in August 2015.  I didn't actually file the claim until 3/2/2016.  The disabilities page in e-benefits states the award date is 3/2/2016.  I thought the idea of submitting the intent to file was to establish an earlier filing date.  I did the FDC claim as well.  I haven't gotten my letter yet from the VA.  But should I get back pay to Aug 2015??  Or only March 2016?

I've spent the last hour searching for answers, but haven't found them.

Thank you,

Derrick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

So I got a very interesting phone call yesterday from the VA.  The person processing my NOD into the system called to recommend I change it to a reconsideration request instead.  She said she talked to people there and they recommended it as it would be much faster and seemed pretty straight forward.  She wasn't able to confirm that it's an error, but certainly implied it.  We'll see how this works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

 You need to wait until yo get your  award packet...look so see if they awared your claim back to 8- 2015? 

My understanding of the ITF the claim date is the date you file on ebennys but not hit submit button & then the ITF Claim is good for 1 year and the date you submitting your case you file ITF on Aug## 2015  & your claim was awarded  3-2 -2016  the correct EED would be Aug-2015

if they have your ITF Claim dated from 3-2016  that's wrong

File a NOD disagree with the EED Date  it should be from the 8- 2015 date  or the next month 9-2015   because of the advanced payment starting on the 1st of each month.

jmo

.................Buck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

 Here is an opinion from a Veteran over at VBN Site.

Posts: 19107

 Jan 23 13 1:39 P


    What folks here refer to as a "reconsideration" is nothing more than a reopened claim and it requires new evidence not previously considered.  Absent a clear and unmistakable error, a decision cannot be changed by the office of original jurisdiction based on the same evidence that was used for the original decision.  

With that in mind, you cannot have both a reopened claim and a Notice of Disagreement pending at the same time on the same issue.  If you file a Notice of Disagreement the reopened claim will be withdrawn since there would be no further jurisdiction to consider that claim due to the NOD.  It would now be in the hands of the appellate people.

Also, the reopened claim (reconsideration) does not extend the original appeal period; therefore, unless you are absolutely sure that the new evidence will result in a change in the first decision, you should submit an NOD prior to the expiration of the appeal period.  If you don't and that decision becomes final, any NOD on the reopened claim will be based on that date of claim.  

That doesn't automatically mean that you would lose the earlier effective date if you subsequently prevail on the appeal since the determining factor in this is when the new evidence that warranted a change in the prior decision was received, not when that prior appeal period ended or when the decision was made on the reopened claim.  If the critical evidence was RECEIVED by VA prior to the expiration of that earlier appeal period, the earlier effective date is still in play regardless of when the actual decision on the reopened claim is made.
 
 

Edited by Buck52
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
25 minutes ago, Buck52 said:

 You need to wait until yo get your  award packet...look so see if they awared your claim back to 8- 2015? 

My understanding of the ITF the claim date is the date you file on ebennys but not hit submit button & then the ITF Claim is good for 1 year and the date you submitting your case you file ITF on Aug## 2015  & your claim was awarded  3-2 -2016  the correct EED would be Aug-2015

if they have your ITF Claim dated from 3-2016  that's wrong

File a NOD disagree with the EED Date  it should be from the 8- 2015 date  or the next month 9-2015   because of the advanced payment starting on the 1st of each month.

jmo

.................Buck

Yes, I got the award package.  They only awarded effective date of March this year.  I think this falls in the clear and unmistakable error.  I withdrew the NOD and submitted for reconsideration with a copy of the rules and bennies printout of when I initiated my claim and the e-mail I received when I initiated my claim.  I think it should be pretty straight forward and they came give me my additional $8K in back pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Just my oinion but you should have filled the NOD  to protect your EED.  

Filing a Reconsideration for EED will lose your EED .

If your lucky they will turn this Reconsideration back to the NOD.

  Note:

This below was written by /From a RETIRED VA RATER 20 years with the VA Claims.

 You recently had a discussion about how "reconsideration" is used instead of going straight to a formal appeal. These are my comments about that.

I agree with you and the lawyer, there is no such thing as “reconsideration.” These are duplicate claims with no basis in law to reconsider unless evidence, not previously considered, is received. What should be happening in these cases (we routinely did it until around early-mid 2000, is that a letter should be sent to Veteran indicating that if he has additional evidence not previously considered, we will be glad to reconsider; otherwise, you have the remaining one year to appeal the decision. At this point, any pending claim would be cancelled.

It could also be liberally construed as a dissatisfaction with the decision and accepted as a Notice of Disagreement. In my opinion, this is the best option so the Veteran does not get more unnecessary letters and further delay of the inevitable denial possibly several more times.

38 CFR 3.160(d) describes a "finally adjudicated claim."

(d) Finally adjudicated claim. An application, formal or informal, which has been allowed or disallowed by the agency of original jurisdiction, the action having become final by the expiration of 1 year after the date of notice of an award or disallowance, or by denial on appellate review, whichever is the earlier.

The VCAA that now exists covers not only what is required for service connection, but also any evaluation and effective date that is assigned.

In other words, there is only one VCAA letter required for the entire claim period even if BVA does not make a decision for years (as long as no new law change impacting it) because it is not yet finally adjudicated.

Instead of reverting back to that simple process, particularly in the absence of new evidence that has not been previously considered, VA opens a new claim, sends another VCAA letter, and then requests the exact duplicate evidence that they just requested months earlier. Talk about an appellate administrative nightmare and a clear waste of human resources! They now have taken credit for working five cases when, in fact, they truly only worked one (and four duplicate claims). Now, they have a backlog that Veterans are being blamed for.

VA should be answering this question. How it is possible for them to reconsider a claim that is not yet finally adjudicated, in the absence of new evidence not previously considered (in other words a duplicate claim with no basis in law)? The training on finally adjudicated claims started going awry when they separated appeals out from the regular workload. As time went on from this point, there was (and still is) little to no appeals training and we now have a complete and utter mess that is so out of control that it is sickening. This is also why dependents are added so often with the wrong effective date. I can’t tell you how many senseless appeals we have on this issue.

The “finally adjudicated claim” was grounded in every employee when I started working there. You heard it, ad nauseam, until you knew what it was and what it meant.

VBMS will not solve any of these problems and the Veterans will continue to have long delays. The VA will continue to shift the sand piles (workload) from one area to another for the illusion of progress being made. With the completely disorganized way documents are being placed in this new system, the massive duplicate and triplicate evidence that is already contained in the claims file being scanned in, as well as many other problems that timely affect a rater, including the massive latency issues and having to open one page at a time and then having to change each one to a full screen or having to scroll the page, one cannot tell how much time will be added to process an appellate case.

 

Edited by Buck52
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I did the reconsideration, it worked for me.  That is no guarantee for you.  Took 4 months to complete, but in the end they got it right.  CUE was so obvious it was like someone hit the original rater with a stupid stick.

This type of reconsideration is listed only in M21 training manual, and is limited as to what they can do.  If you do this, give them no more than 90-120 days, and then submit the appeal to get your date reserved.  This is not in the CFR, nor is this in the USC, it is independent and the VA can totally ignore it, so watch it closely.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • I found this quiet Interesting supreme court decison
      click the link to read about this.

      https://usmilitary.org/supreme-court-decision-may-affect-veterans-across-the-us-wave-disability-deadline-for-thousands/

      From the Article

       
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 16 replies
    • A VA Compensation and Pension Examiners Perspective
      A VA Compensation and Pension Examiners Perspective

      This person is going to judge you. It’s their job, and that is why you are there. To be adjudicated fairly. How would you like to be remembered? A scuzzy stereotypical veteran? Or a troubled one who is doing the best they can?

      Do not talk about alcohol or drug-related issues. You are not there to be assessed for those problems. You are there to be evaluated for your psychiatric functioning as today relates to your service history. If the examiner asks about alcohol or drugs, politely remind them that you are not there for those issues if you’ve ever had them, but for how impaired you are in your daily functioning. It’s best to avoid even talking about them. Got a VA horror story? I can tell you a worse one. Don’t waste your time with how badly you believe you’ve been mistreated. The examiner only has a short time to figure out how impaired you are, and they need the facts, concise sentences, and not rambling rants that lead nowhere.
      • 0 replies
    • VA Math, Confusing, Right? Calculate Your Final Rating Percentage!
      10 + 50 = 50 and other VA math mysteries explained.

      VA Math It’s Not Your Mother’s Arithmetic 

      “VA Math” is the way that the VA computes combined impairment ratings for multiple conditions in a Veteran’s compensation benefits claim – and it requires that you unlearn real math. When a Veteran has multiple medical conditions that are service-connected and the Veterans Affairs rates each at a different percentage, it would seem that they should just add up your percentages to get to a total body impairment rating.
      • 2 replies
    • VA will propose adding rare cancers to the presumed service-connected list as related to military environmental exposure
    • Post in I need some help, please
      If you are looking for help taking care of him something like a home health aide that comes in during the week and helps with what he needs help with. For this I would contact your local VA hospital and ask to speak to the Social Worker, explain your situation, ask for help and how to proceed.

      If you are looking for additional compensation in the form of Special Monthly Compensation check out this video from CCK Law I think it will give you a good idea what it is and how to go about applying for it.

      For example there is a Special Monthly Compensation Rate for TBI try reading this article from The Veterans Law Blog on SMC T It is a subscription site but it allows you to view 3 articles for free a month.

      Special Monthly Compensation (SMC)

      I hope this helps.

       
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • How to get your questions answered...

    question-001.jpeg

    All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. Read the forums without registering, to post you must register it’s free. Register for a free account.

    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery” instead of ‘I have a question’.
    2. Knowledgable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title. I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one huge, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.

    Leading to:

    Post clear questions and then give background info on them.

    Examples:

    • A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine but claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
    • B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • I was involved in traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?

    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial from your claim?” etc.

    Note:

    Your firsts posts on the board may be delayed before they show up, as they are reviewed, this process does not take long and the review requirement will be removed usually by the 6th post, though we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.

    This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before they hit the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims and this helps us do that.

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines