Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

BVA Appeal Awarded Sleep Apnea - RO Not Rating

Rate this question


Question

Posted

Hi all,  been a while since I've posed a question to the forum.  October 2015, my BVA appeal was remanded to Regional Office with wording that states BVA judge agrees, I do have sleep apnea, service records indicated SA along with several other ailments and SA was diagnosed while on active duty.  During my initial CP exam, Dr. refused to indicate SA, and I have been appealing since 2009.  I haven't received the yellow envelope yet, but just tonight ebenefits shows claim is complete, but there is no rating or indication that SA was awarded, still states not service connected for Obstructive SA.

My question is does the RO have authority to ignore or nullify what the BVA Judge awarded?  Will be anxiously awaiting the yellow envelope.  Been a 7 year fight with VBA and still no resolution on SA, at least from the looks of what's in ebenefits.

 

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

A redacted copy of the Remand, would be helpful. What were the exact instructions listed in the Remand?

Semper Fi

  • 0
Posted

I can type in key points from the BVA Appeal Notification from Oct 19, 2015.

 

Finding of Fact

The weight of the evidences shows that the Veteran has sleep apnea as a result of active service.

Conclusion of the Law

The criteria to establish service connection for sleep apnea have been met.

38 USCA 1110, 1131(WEST 2002): 38 CFR #.303 (2014)

Reasons and Bases for Finding and Conclusion

I'll paraphrase this - it's almost 2 pages:

My etiology - A Jan 2008 sleep study .... The diagnosis was mild obstructive sleep apnea.

A January 2009 VA examination report reflects veterans reports of having sleep problems since 1991. The examiner did not perform a sleep study, but rather cited the Jan 2008 Sleep Study which the examiner noted showed obstructive sleep apnea.  The examiners assessment was sleep apnea.

 

Order

Entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea is granted.

 

Signed by Veterans Law Judge

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use