Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Additional claim pending NOD


Good morning, I've had a NOD pending in St. Pete for a PTSD Claim, I was advised to process that claim first.  It was denied, hence the NOD.  I have several other claims I would like to file, but was told they would not be reviewed/looked at until the the NOD was resolved. Is this true?  That doesn't make sense to me, but this whole gig hasn't made any.

Thanks for the comments.


GySgt, Ret.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Not true in my experience.

I have had various claims in various stages be resolved at various times.

The important thing here is to file your new claims now!  All of your benefits are based on the date of claim.  It doesn't matter if the claim is then delayed, you get benefits back to the date you filed.

If you wait to file, you lose out!

I have heard that filing claims can slow down the overall process, but that was also back when there were paper claims files; they didn't like moving physical files around.  Now everything is electronic so that doesn't matter.  

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • 0

Welcome to Hadit!

I had an active NOD in progress and the VA still completed several other claims. Appeals are based on dates, so you don't lose your place in the NOD line just because you file other claims.

If you filed what is referred to as a "shotgun claim" (has large number of disabilities), then processing can take more time. I read a BVA case a while back that involved over 40 claimed disabilities. Typically, the regional office will try to knock them all out at the same time, but in the end, some may be able to be approved while the others remain deferred waiting for something else. Unless you're on the verge of hardship, it is probably best to let the VA be thorough.

If you submit a claim, it is generally a good idea to also request any secondary conditions which may meet the rating criteria. If the VA grants the initially claimed disability, then they are supposed to also evaluate any secondary conditions. Just because they are supposed to do this, doesn't mean that it actually happens. Why not go ahead and let them know.
  For example, if you filed for PTSD and the medications use to treat it cause your hydraulics to not function properly, that could be grounds for an ED claim. Another example is with back injuries. If you injured your back in the service, but now have really bad sciatica then that may also qualify as a secondary claim. It's like the old, "hip bone connected to the thigh bone" song. Some disabilities have an unwanted cascading effect.

Good luck!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Agree.  It isnt true.  You may apply for any benefit at any time.  It does not matter if its in appeals.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:



        • Thanks

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines