Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question about VSO’s

Rate this question


Austin0520

Question

Hello everyone, thanks to all who have shared, the posts here have helped me a lot to get an idea of this difficult process. 

I have a question because I’m still trying to understand how everything works. Are the VSO’s on our side? I always thought yes, but recently I feel I’ve had a couple that are stalling the process or not giving me great advice. I’m just wondering so I know how to proceed.  Been seriously thinking about going the lawyer route because I know they will do what’s best for my case since they get a percentage.

Thanks everyone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

In my opinion, any claimant who depends completely on a vet rep or VSO, might well end up in the crapper.

Although there are certainly great VSOS out there- they are also probably burned out, most of the time.

Everything you need to know as to how to succeed in your claim is here at hadit.

Often some vets  think a vet rep or even a lawyer or IMO doctor can establish the critical "nexus" factor for them.

Sometimes they can but that is often up to the veteran themselves to prove.

Has your claim been denied?

If so the VA gave a reason for the denial that you need to overcome.

Maybe we can help more if we know more.

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks Berta! I hope I’m in the right section, I’m having trouble navigating the forum (how will I ever navigate the VA system??!) haha

I have lots of stuff going on. The claim I was referring to in this post was denial of hip arthritis secondary to a service connected foot injury. I have been fighting this for years, and the VA says it’s not service connected. Several doctors have told me that it is BUT not one will write their professional opinion on paper for me. I’ve gotten in touch with Dr. Bash to help. Thanks to everyone who recommended him! 

My question about the VSO was just a general question, I’m trying to understand the system. 

Thanks Berta, you’re a wealth of knowledge!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

There are a wide variety of opinions on VSO's, and I respect Berta's.  But, I also know that not everyone has Berta's skills, and needs help.  Yes, you can get help on hadit, but, even then its not enough for some people.  Some Veterans lack education, computer expertise, organization skills, and some even lack the funds for postage to send stuff in themselves.  Some dont even have an ADDRESS, and are homeless!  

Sure, there are Veterans who will tell you, "My VSO, Jimmy, helped me win benefits," and that is probably true.  However, like Berta, many Vets advocates do NOT recommend a VSO.  

Lets shy away from anecdotal evidence, and turn to percentages of "wins" found at the Board of Veterans appeals:

EACH year, the BVA Chairman compiles statistics, and sends this report to congress:

https://www.bva.va.gov/Chairman_Annual_Rpts.asp

On page 29, of the 2017 report, you will see that Veterans represented by attorney's have the best win percentage at 39.9 percent.  Attorney's also have the lowest denial percentage at 13.7 percent (most of the rest are "remands")  

Previous years also showed that attorney represented Vetrans won their claim at the BVA more often than those represented by VSO's, and they were denied less.  

Thus, for many Vets, its worth it to hire an attorney, according to the statistics at the BVA.  

Personally, even tho I have been a hadit member for 10 years, I am still currently represented by an attorney (at the CAVC).  My attorney is Chris Attig, who often posts helpful information for Veterans on hadit.  

It is my understanding that Chris Attig represents only Veterans who have been denied by The BVA, as I was.  

I can tell you the timing of hiring an attorney is important.  In my opinion, the best time is as soon as possible AFTER a BVA denial.  The reason is, that attorneys can often get their fees paid at the CAVC by EAJA, which means the Veteran pays little or nothing.  

I hired an attorney about 2 years ago, also after a BVA denial.  Eventually, I was awarded benefits but not at the effective date I thought was correct, so I appealed again.    Still, I won about 35 k in retro, and most of my attorney fees were paid by EAJA. 

Alex Graham is one of the most knowledgeable on here, and he even enlisted the services of an attorney a few years ago when he won a six figure retro back to 1994.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Broncovet,

Thank you so much for this information! Exactly what I was looking for and couldn’t find it.  I think I will contact Chris Attig and see what he thinks. I appreciate the information and the referral! I wish I would have found hadit 10 years ago!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use