Jump to content
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
ADAMS

ischemic heart disease

Question

Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

doc00580220191213082945.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

"IHD is rated under Diagnostic Code 7005. The rating criteria are as follows. A 10 percent rating is warranted for a workload of greater than 7 metabolic equivalents (METs) but not greater than 10 METs resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or continuous medication required. A 30 percent rating is warranted if a workload between 5 and 7 METs results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or if there is evidence of cardiac hypertrophy or dilatation. A 60 percent rating is warranted if there had been more than one episode of acute congestive heart failure (CHF) in the past year; or if a workload between 3 and 5 METs results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or if there is left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30-50 percent. A 100 percent rating is warranted if there is chronic CHF; or if a workload of 3 METs or less results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or if there is left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of less than 30 percent. 38 C.F.R. § 4.104, Diagnostic Code 7005 (2017)."

https://www.va.gov/vetapp19/files6/19144427.txt

You claimed the IHD as secondary to your HBP_ do you have a SC rating now for the HBP?

The ECHO states Risk Factors as Hyperlipidemia- are you a diabetic?

Are you an incountry Vietnam veteran or did you serve anywhere else, (even in USA) where you might have been exposed to AO?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

to add- I am not a doctor but Ischemic heart disease is often due to affects of hyperlipidemia, ( meaning high cholesterol and high triglycerides- which is a different association than to HBP.

I mention that because I had to prove to the VA-General counsel- that my husband died of IHD, which was never diagnosed or treated by the VA, in spite of high glycericide values, an ECHO revealing severe atherosclerotic heart disease, and 2 EKGs clearly indicating heart disease, and the autopsy confirmed that.

Years later I was able to prove that he also had undiagnosed and untreated Diabetes Mellitus from AO, and I proved that to myself and then I also obtained 3 IMOs that supported my claim.

That is why I asked if you are a diabetic.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
19 minutes ago, Berta said:

"IHD is rated under Diagnostic Code 7005. The rating criteria are as follows. A 10 percent rating is warranted for a workload of greater than 7 metabolic equivalents (METs) but not greater than 10 METs resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or continuous medication required. A 30 percent rating is warranted if a workload between 5 and 7 METs results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or if there is evidence of cardiac hypertrophy or dilatation. A 60 percent rating is warranted if there had been more than one episode of acute congestive heart failure (CHF) in the past year; or if a workload between 3 and 5 METs results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or if there is left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30-50 percent. A 100 percent rating is warranted if there is chronic CHF; or if a workload of 3 METs or less results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or if there is left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of less than 30 percent. 38 C.F.R. § 4.104, Diagnostic Code 7005 (2017)."

https://www.va.gov/vetapp19/files6/19144427.txt

You claimed the IHD as secondary to your HBP_ do you have a SC rating now for the HBP?

The ECHO states Risk Factors as Hyperlipidemia- are you a diabetic?

Are you an incountry Vietnam veteran or did you serve anywhere else, (even in USA) where you might have been exposed to AO?

 

I am SC for Hypertension, I dont have diabetes I have high cholesterol. Gulf war VET.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I am glad you are SCed for the HBP- but not glad you have  HBP----

There certainly is medical associations between HBP as causing IHD:

https://www.webmd.com/hypertension-high-blood-pressure/qa/can-high-blood-pressure-cause-ischemic-heart-disease

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/myocardial-ischemia/symptoms-causes/syc-20375417

But I think you will probably need an IMO/IME to prove the claim.

Secondary conditions can often be obvious ones, bu it seems the VA does not always provide a C & P exam that will support these types of  claims.

A IMO/IME doctor following the IMO criteria here at hadit can rule out any other etiology but for the HBP as the sole cause of the ischemic heart disease. They will give your medical records the first thorough reading they will probably ever get.

 

Edited by Berta
weather at high altitude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Echocardiograms for IHD seem to be a new thing for C&P exams.  I have always thought that a C&P examiner guessing at your METs level by just asking you questions off of a DBQ was questionable.    A physical stress test should give a more accurate METs level.  I just received a call for my 3rd C&P exam for IHD and it includes an echocardiogram.  You need to get someone who understands the results of your echocardiogram to tell you what it has to do with METs.  As Bertha informed you that IHD falls under Diagnostic Code 7005 and she listed the requirements for the different disability per centages.  The VA dropped the LVEF several months ago and supposedly just going by your METs level . . . that may have changed with the inclusion of echocardiograms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
    • I was denied SC for IBS and GERD IN 2011. In 2019 I was awarded SC for GERD. This CUE  is for 2011, both GERD and IBS. There are some odd aspects regarding the 2011 decision, the way it was written and the C&P report and the way it was written. I've tried to present this as clearly as I can. Note: the decision contradicts itself. the decision also contradicts the C&P Report. Honestly, I think the rater just got confused because the C&P was so poorly written. *THIS CUE HAS NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED*Please let me know what you think. Appreciate all comments and suggestions. Thanks.

       

      VA RATING DECISION MARCH 23 2011 GERD IBS.pdf C P REPORT 7312010 GERD IBS.pdf GERD IBS CUE 2011(1).pdf

      C P ADDENDUM REQUEST RE DIAGNOSIS 7232010.pdf
      • 56 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines