Mr cue Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 Ok here it is and I can't believe this Ok let start with do u see that nothing is address before 2018. We understand smc Is effective by the record and granted by the record. Ok. The court set a side the effective dates an explain to the va to address early time period. Not done because they change the court remand order to granted effective dates in first instance. So now I am back at the court to appeal the same effective dates the court set a side. Ok. I apply for smc s under Howell v Nicholson. It is never address I even got denied because I can travel medical appointments. The same reason Howell was denied smh. Last I had a judge remand the cavc. That a different judge remand it again. Than a different judge just made the decision. All in six months I guess the judge who was handling the remand st first retire than the one who remand again retir. Because this is the only way you have 3 different judges on a cavc remand. Ain't no 2 bva judge's retire In.6 months of handling my cavc remand. Here the decision I will.ein st the court just made.they are playing all these games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Berta Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 It does not come up on the new BVA search feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Mr cue Posted January 3, 2022 Author Share Posted January 3, 2022 Berta it is really crazy. This what my petition for extraordinary relief was about. Because they removed this from my 2018 cavc remand docket number and gave it a new 21 appeal date. Now I believe this is even a valid decision. But I am at the court now appealing it. Smh Here is the other docket number for the smc effective dates which were also remove from the cavc remand docket number and process under the new appeal system. When I never requested it. Docket No. 210726-175126 Advanced on the Docket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Mr cue
Ok here it is and I can't believe this
Ok let start with do u see that nothing is address before 2018.
We understand smc Is effective by the record and granted by the record.
Ok. The court set a side the effective dates an explain to the va to address early time period.
Not done because they change the court remand order to granted effective dates in first instance.
So now I am back at the court to appeal the same effective dates the court set a side.
Ok. I apply for smc s under Howell v Nicholson.
It is never address I even got denied because I can travel medical appointments.
The same reason Howell was denied smh.
Last I had a judge remand the cavc.
That a different judge remand it again.
Than a different judge just made the decision.
All in six months I guess the judge who was handling the remand st first retire than the one who remand again retir.
Because this is the only way you have 3 different judges on a cavc remand.
Ain't no 2 bva judge's retire In.6 months of handling my cavc remand.
Here the decision I will.ein st the court just made.they are playing all these games.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
7
3
2
1
Popular Days
Nov 29
5
Jan 3
4
Nov 30
3
Nov 28
1
Top Posters For This Question
Mr cue 7 posts
Berta 3 posts
Rattler 2 posts
broncovet 1 post
Popular Days
Nov 29 2021
5 posts
Jan 3 2022
4 posts
Nov 30 2021
3 posts
Nov 28 2021
1 post
14 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now