Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Will my lawyer still get paid if I remove as my POA?

Rate this question


GulfWarVet1990

Question

Good evening, I hired a lawyer to represent me for OSA appeal last year. 

This year I am working on other claims on my own, and I want to remove the lawyer as my POA since he is not working on these claims.  

His compensation would be well earned and I want to make sure that he is paid for my OSA appeal, however, he should not get a percentage for claims that I am working on that he has not assisted or agreed to take on. 

Does anyone know if I remove the lawyer as my POA will he still get paid when my OSA claim is granted.  

Honestly I trying to avoid VA from automatically paying him if and when my other claims are granted. 

Thank you. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
44 minutes ago, broncovet said:

Before you fire your lawyer, remember, the ones I dealt with did not send you an email "every time" they filed a piece of paper with VA.  So, frankly, you dont know if "they are working them or not".  Remember, Va has millions of Veterans, and your attorney likely also has many, many other Veteran claimants.  

And, yes, my attorneys who have represented me did not return every call.  They made it clear they can not "hold our hand" and educate us on every VA policy or regulation.  Instead, we pay them to win us retro, if we want education in Veterans law, attend a college.  If, on the other hand, we want emotional support, get a counselor at VA.  Your attorney is neither of those.  

They "bill VA by the hour" to justify their fees, and talking to a Veteran listening to him complain about how long VA is taking, is not the kind of a thing the lawyer can write down as a conference for billing.  That is, its not "billable hours".   Frankly, your attorney probably does not want to listen to every "claimant theory" on what the attorney should do to get benefits.  He has reviewed your file, and is most likely taken actions he deems have the best chance of winning additional benefits.  

He really probably does not want to argue or debate with you the merits of all the claimants benefit theories.  You know, "what if we file Cue on 38 CFR 4.06?" or "Why hasnt the judge ruled on my claim yet?" or "Gee, that does not sound fair..why would VA do that?"  

Source:  My personal experience with at least 3 law firms who represented me on Veterans claims issues.  

Thanks Broncovet. I have not intention of firing my lawyer. He has been very helpful.  As stated his fees are well earned. 

Before I hired him I had a legacy appeal from 2004. Long story, claim was lost in VA black hole, claim was adjudicated 2022, all denied except two. I submitted Form 9, and I worked on the appeal myself, so if and when granted I will get a hefty back pay. He did not work on this claim and I want to make sure "I gets my full amount of money." 

On ebenefits and other VA letter he is listed as my POA (representative) on all correspondences pertaining to all claims I have pending.  There is no distinction of the claims he worked on which is the reason I posted.  I therefore wasn't fully sure how the monies would be distributed by the VA. From Phury's post I now understand the process. 

Thank you all. I will keep you posted.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It sounds like you're taking proactive steps in managing your claims. It's understandable that you want to ensure fair compensation for your lawyer's work. If you decide to remove your lawyer as your POA, they may still be entitled to payment for the work they've already done on your OSA appeal, especially if it's already in progress. However, it's important to clarify with your lawyer whether they will continue to represent you for the OSA appeal even if you remove them as your POA.


If you need further assistance or legal advice, this resource on Dodd-Frank lawyers might provide helpful insights https://federal-lawyer.com/whistleblower-lawyers/dodd-frank/. Best of luck with your claims, and thank you for your service!

Edited by PatricBrien
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • navyvet2009 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use