mikemiskell Posted May 24, 2023 Share Posted May 24, 2023 What is a supplemental statement of the case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Moderator brokensoldier244th Posted May 24, 2023 Moderator Share Posted May 24, 2023 It is a statement of the case that is provided during a remand, after submission of new evidence, or due to a partial grant with other contentions still undecided. M21-1 7.D.2.a, M21-1 7.D.4.a The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution. B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008 M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021 M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022 100% P/T MDD Spine Radiculopathy Sleep Apnea Some other stuff -------------------------------------------B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021 (I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents, and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Moderator broncovet Posted May 27, 2023 Moderator Share Posted May 27, 2023 (edited) SOC, and SSOC (Statement of case, and supplemental statement of case) are a good example of mostly useless paperwork, and largely result in unnecessary delays. There very premise is flawed. The VA is supposed to "state the Veterans case". Its a conflict of interest. Its like asking your opponent at law's attorney to help you win. Its based upon mostly a false narrative: The VA suggests that VA is not out "to get the Veteran" but rather to assist the Veteran to get his/her benefits. If the above sentence were true, why are there about 500 attorney's who wait their turn to be assigned "against" a veteran who is appealing. Instead of the VA hiring attorneys to "grant the Veteran fewer benefits" (preferably none, for the VA), attorneys should be provided to "help" the Veteran, not the VA. Its a conflict of interest, for example, for the VA "to have control of the evidence" and its only released to the Veteran "on the VA's schedule", or sometimes not at all. Its also an conflict of interest to allow the VA an unlimited amount of time to process Veterans claims, but have a "strict" time frame for Veterans to appeal. It should be exactly the opposite. The VA should have a deadline to grant or deny Veterans claims, and the Veteran should be able to appeal "on his/her schedule", not the VA's schedule. The Veteran should be able to "state his own case" not have the VA (the VEterans opponent at law) state his case for him. Generally, the SOC and SSOC are time wasters. "Sometimes" the Veteran, however, can nail the VA for "failure" to supply a SOC or SSOC, even if, the SOC OR SSOC is useless. Edited May 27, 2023 by broncovet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
mikemiskell
What is a supplemental statement of the case
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
1
Popular Days
May 24
2
May 27
1
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 1 post
brokensoldier244th 1 post
mikemiskell 1 post
Popular Days
May 24 2023
2 posts
May 27 2023
1 post
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now