Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chronic Sinunitis

Rate this question


spike

Question

I have not been able in 5 years been able to find out how to SC sinunitis....I have been shown many things that I was treated for it several times in the Marines. I have shown I was in a warehouse exposed to a lot of things. I even indicated to the VA that I was exposed to petro exposure for 4 years. Yet they say they cant prove SC for this. I know I only suffered from this since i was in the USMC and I dont know how to prove it. Please help.

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Spike,

Rather than just cite a BVA case I think it would be better to understand the logic cited in any doctors reports shown on the BVA awards. Then try to get a doctor to write a similar report for you that applies to your claim. You could take the BVA report to the doctor to show him what other doctors are saying. Your front line attack is with the doctors not the adjudicators. Once you have strong medical evidence the adjudicators have a difficult time denying the claim.

There are many ways to get strong medical evidence. I am glad to hear you have found the BVA cases and are no getting a better picture of what goes on with claims that are awarded.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advise Hoppy. I will do that but I think i should wait until my I/U case is done....too bad they can multi task over at the VARO

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Spike,

Some more things to keep in mind when you do your research.

I recall you were diagnosed a couple times with sinusitis while on active duty. The problem was that the RO did not think it was chronic. I do not know much about this disease, so my thoughts on your claim will wonder around many options I have read about in various BVA cases.

The fact that you had the diagnosis would be hard to dispute by the RO. Thus, you would have a condition that would at least be considered sinusitis of unknown etiology. They might refer to it in BVA cases as "idiopathic sinusitis". That is they know you have it but they do not know what is causing it. Thus, it could be episodic and not chronic or part of a more chronic condition. The VA can rate idiopathic conditions.

The big question at this time is do you have ongoing symptoms that occur 24/7 or structural changes such as polyps. If the symptoms are episodic and come and go then the question may arise as to what is triggering the episodes. If the trigger cannot be identified and your episodes are sufficiently chronic to meet the requirements of the rating schedule then you are still on track for a valid claim. If the trigger is identified and it can be removed and avoided the VA generally does not rate these. However, if the trigger is very common and the continued episodes are sufficiently chronic to be disabling then your are still on track. You can research this by reading allergy claims. Allergy claims and other idiopathic claims of episodic conditions are dealt with in similar fashion by the VA.

I have been wondering if sinusitis can be caused by smoking cigarettes. If so and you were a smoker this might confuse the claim.

A nexus between the current condition and the in-service condition or continuity of treatment can also become an issue. Depending on the frequency of episodic conditions the continuity issue can be only addressed by a doctor. If the RO tells you that there was to long of a lapse between the military and post service treatment without seeking a medical opinion then the door is open to get a medical opinion that states otherwise.

A good question to ask doctors is once you start having symptoms of sinusitis, how is it that a doctor would determine if and when the disease completely resolves. Additionally, what is the frequency in the general population and the likelihood that an individual would contract the condition and have an unrelated cause develop later in life. I have seen the VA wave the nexus requirement when a disease is generally considered to be chronic or has no known cure. Diseases that have no known cure and manifest later or are known to become dormant and then active are often service connected.

I was diagnosed in the military with a disease that is rare, is considered to be chronic and has the potential to become more severe later in in life and has no known cure. The reason the disease becomes more severe in some people and not others is unknown. The reason I got the opinion that progression of severity is unknown is to keep the VA from trying to say events after the military were actually inter-current injuries. I provided the VA with letters from doctors supporting all the features of this disease to the RO. I was still denied for idiotic reasons and was eventually service connected by a DRO. The RO tried to say that the medical opinions were based on my subjective opinions. I argued that I did not point any guns at the doctors or twist there arms. They wrote the reports because these were the medical facts. They did not even identify what exactly it was that I told the doctors that the doctors would have based there opinions on. I had a stack of about 40 post service reports from doctors who actually saw active and severe (life threatening) symptoms of the disease. I was treated in ER's and plugged into IV's with numerous drugs. The documentation of the symptoms and treatment was very specific and noted by about 25 different doctors. Yet it took a DRO to see through the BS.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Hoppy said it very well. With me, I have had five operations since leaving military service, and yet, the breathing still is problematic. In fact, a metal prosthesis was inserted to open the left nasal valve and even that is problematic since it causes infections around the area and the discharges cause blockages of the passage which require visits to the ENT for him to insert that nine inch device into my nose to remove the obstruction. Let me tell you that is painful no matter how much pain meds I take prior. If we used that device to extract confessions from detainees we would have a lot better intel. For me it is impossible to know if the ENT on active duty had handled this back then whether or not it would be better now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no im sorry they consider it chronic but they say i was treated for it in service but nothing to connect it to. However, I was reviewing my entrance medical exam and it indicated my Sinuses were perfectly normal before active duty. Would that be enough to show SC is the problem.

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Spike,

They call it chronic. My question is what are the symptoms? And do you have any current exam notes indicating what the symptoms are. Do they say you have nasal obstruction or just discoloration of the tissues. I have seen these types of notes in my file.

It is important for me to know the date of the denial and if it was denied without a C&P exam. Did the people at the hospital refuse to write a nexus letter or did you have a C&P exam scheduled by the RO at the hospital?

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use