Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What type of appeal should I use? (SCL, HLR, BVA, CAVC)

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

I will begin explaining each which may answer many of your questions:

1.  SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM.  

  • Quote

     

    • You have new and relevant evidence to submit, or  
    • You’re requesting a review of your claim based on a change in law (such as the PACT Act) 

     

    Its important to note here, "how do I know if I have new evidence"?  That will require a review of your file, along with your decision, and see if ALL the evidence necessary was listed on the decision in the "evidence section".  Often this is a problem because VA will be vague:"The Veterans claim file from 1-14-02 to 7-13-23.    This does not specifically say the favorable exam on 2-14-21 was included or not.  Does the VA have that Feb 14, 2021 exam which stated your current condition is at least as likely as not due to an event in service?  We dont know for sure.  Its problematic.  Source:  https://www.va.gov/disability/how-to-file-claim/when-to-file/#:~:text=that was denied-,Supplemental Claim—provide new evidence to support a disability claim,isn't a contested claim

2.  HLR.  You can request HLR if you think the rater made an error on your decision, but you may not submit new evidence with a HLR.  https://www.va.gov/decision-reviews/higher-level-review/#:~:text=If you disagree with a,with a Higher-Level Review.

Both of the above decisions are regional office reviews, supposedly by a more experienced rating specialist.  

They can be completed in as little as 6 months, but only if you guessed correctly whether or not you need to submit new, relevant evidence.  If you guessed wrong, you often have to start over, and resubmit the appeal with the correct format (HLR OR SCL)  

Its a problem because you have to either submit new evidence (and take a chance it wasnt new, and already was in the file) or being barred from submitting new evidnece with a HLR, and wind up appealing that to the BVA, after you have squandered time on HLR or SCL.  

My opinion is that you have a low chance of success with the above, because it stays in the VARO, and frankly, the VARO sticks together and they dont like to insult their comrades with "fixing" their mistake on a decision.  This said, people have used these lanes and sometimes get a nice suprise in more like a year or so, much faster than BVA.  This is just my opinion and its not shared by all, and is controversial.  This said, a BVA appeal has over 70 percent chance of being awarded or remanded, according to the BVA chairmans report:  https://www.bva.va.gov/chairman_annual_rpts.asp

I have seen some denial rates as low as 10 percent at the BVA (meaning 90 % were awarded or remanded), usually with attorney representation.  

BVA.  An appeal to the BVA often takes a long time, sometimes 4 years or even more.  But, if you do a good job, you have a great chance of success.  

https://cck-law.com/veterans-law/what-is-the-board-of-veterans-appeals-bva/

For the above type claims:  HLR, SCL, and BVA, you can use a VSO, represent your self, or get an attorney.  

CAVC.   CAVC appeals are used to appeal BVA decisions, and must be done within 120 days of the BVA decision being appealed.  Dont miss this deadline.  My advice is to get an attoreny at the CAVC, because, in part, your legal fees, if any, will likely be paid by EAJA.  You can "file a notice of  appeal" (NOA) on your own, to preserve the 120 day appeal period, then get an attorney if the 120 day clock is running low.  Its relatively simple to file a NOA.  Dowload the simple form here, fill it out and mail it in.  

https://www.uscourts.cavc.gov/documents/RulesFormsAppendix.pdf

You can either send a check for $50 with it, or fill out a form that you are worth less than $2,000,000 requesting a waiver:

https://www.uscourts.cavc.gov/documents/RulesFormsAppendix.pdf.  Its form 4.  

     Again, I recommend attorney representation at the CAVC in all but the most learned, intelligent, Students of Veterans law, people.   Even if you were a lawyer, there is a saying that its still a good idea to hire a lawyer even if you are a lawyer.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use