Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Why We Need Mandatory Funding For Veteran’s Healthcare

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Why we need Mandatory Funding for Veteran’s Healthcare

By Gene D. Simes

Chairman, Operation Firing For Effect

March 29, 2007

Many people are confused about what full funding of the Department of Veterans Affairs really means. Below you will find 8 very good examples of why full mandatory funding of the VA healthcare system is essential. Merely visit the links included to view substantial documentation.

On August 22, 1986, the VAMC in Atlanta Georgia released a Memorandum changing their procedures for self injections for diabetic insulin users. The change in policy was as follows; “Effective for new prescriptions written after September 2, 1986, you should use each disposable insulin syringe two times before throwing it away”. The only possible reason for this new policy was budgetary. This change in procedure was a blatant attempt to cut the year’s insulin syringe budget in half. Apparently, the VA needed funds elsewhere, and decided this very questionable and risky injection procedure was a good idea. Well known Georgia veterans rights advocate Jere Beery led a successful public campaign to have this unsafe practice stopped immediately. This one small example illustrates how budget restraints affect the quality of healthcare our veterans receive. Mandatory full funding would guarantee that our veterans would never be asked to use a dirty syringe again.

Documentation; http://jerebeery.com/va-syringe-useage.htm

Although the telephone has been around for well over a century, it wasn’t until 1996 that all VA hospitals nationwide were equipped with bedside telephones. Up until that time, unless you could make it to the pay phone down the hall, patients made no calls, much less receive any. In 1995, Mr. Francis Dosio of PT Phone Home and the Communication Workers of America Union took up the concept veterans activist Jere Beery had started several years earlier and launched a nationwide project to install bedside phones in every VA hospital in the country. All of the labor and equipment was donated but the story was not publicized. The VA didn’t have to pay one dine for the bedside phone project as all of the funds were donated from the private sector. Mandatory full funding would insure that our veterans do not have to depend on charity for the most basic amenities and services.

Documentation; http://jerebeery.com/bedside_telephones_in_va_hospita.htm

In 1998, the VAMC in Atlanta attempted to implement parking fees for all veterans visiting the facility. Vietnam combat veteran Jere Beery openly challenged the parking plan and stimulated public outrage which halted the idea before it was enforced. But once again, we see desperation by the VA to find funds while passing the cost onto our veterans. Mandatory full funding would guarantee that our veterans are never again ask to pay to access the healthcare services they have earned.

Documentation; http://jerebeery.com/va%20parking%201.htm

In 2006, two veterans died after they were refused entrance and lifesaving treatment at the VA hospital in Spokane Washington. The reason; they arrived after the emergency room had closed. Mandatory full funding would insure that all VA hospitals with a pre-existing emergency room could maintain 24/7 emergency services for critically ill veterans.

Documentation; http://jerebeery.com/offe_extremely_concerned_about_d.htm

In 1978, travel reimbursement for veterans traveling to a VA hospital for a scheduled appointment was 11 cents per mile, which was when gas was 49 cents a gallon. This reimbursement amount has remained unchanged for 29 years. In this case, Mandatory full funding would provide the funds to increase this allowance and allow for the payment of travel pay to fluctuate with the rising cost of fuel.

Currently, the VA has a backlog of over 90,000 claims waiting processing. Many veterans are required to wait well over a year for their VA rating decision. Under-staffing is the primary reason for these delays. Mandatory funding would make it possible for the VA to hire additional staff to process and expedite claims.

Low wages offered by the VA make it very difficult to entice and retain high quality medical professionals. Doctors, nurses, dentist, psychiatrist, counselors, and nutritionist all make significantly more money in the private sector. Mandatory funding would allow for increases in salaries which would attract more medical professionals into the VA healthcare system.

Mandatory funding would also insure that future medical research done by the VA would not be restricted by budget constraints.

These are just 8 examples of why we need full funding of the VA. There are many more examples just like these. I hope this report convinces you to support full mandatory funding for the VA healthcare system. I encourage you to visit our web site, http://offe2008.org/public_html/resolution.htm, print out our resolution, sign it and send it to; Operation Firing For Effect, P.O. Box 77303, Rochester, NY 14617. Remember, if you do nothing, you can expect nothing to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use