Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Berta

Tdiu As Inferred Issue

Question

http://72.14.209.104/custom?q=cache:NH78zl...381742111066612

"h. Identifying Inferred Claims of IU The Rating Veterans Service Representative (RVSR) is responsible for identifying claims with potential entitlement to increased compensation based on IU even when no specific claim for the benefit has been made.

A claim of IU is reasonably raised or inferred when

the evidence shows that a veteran’s schedular rating meets the minimum criteria found in 38 CFR 4.16(a), and

evidence in the claimant’s file or under Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) control shows the veteran might be unemployable as a result of SC disability."

I have attached so many TDIU forms to NODs and also posted the 21-8940 form here over the years that I think my 3 1/2 with the TDIU pdf form will wear out.

I do this because of this part of the M21-1 guidelines-

a part that I think is unfair and yet the veteran CAN challenge the EED if they basis it this way:

" i. Processing Inferred Claims of IU When an inferred claim of IU is identified, VA will

send the veteran VA Form 21-8940 for completion

take the existing end product (EP) credit by award action or PCLR, if no other issues remain pending, and

establish a new EP 021, using the date VA Form 21-8940 is sent to the veteran as the date the claim."

They are saying the evidence determined to VA that there is likelihood of TDIU award so that EED would pressed the date of the claim-which they are saying to consider as date the veteran files the claim.

At least this is the way I interpret their double talk.

A vet could say- get the TDIU form from VA on April 3rd,2007, fill it out, send it back, etc, they award TDIU back to April 3rd------

yet clearly that is NOT the EED of TDIU.

Yet I really do not think they pull that much at all-but clearly they could based on the way this is written.

This part:

"requesting information from SSA, see M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart iii, 3.A, and

the effect of SSA decisions regarding unemployability on VA determinations, see Murincsak v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 363 (1992)."

Tbird is developing links, asking for input-under Schedule of Ratings topic-

She already put Murincsak there and I have used this claim many times

as well as Washington V Derwinski-which I believe preceeded Murincsak.

Established precedential Case law from COVA and from the CAVC certainly is as prevalent today in M21-1 as it was years ago-

It is important that-when a vet gets SSA -VA gets those records-especially when the SSA is for the same condition that they want TDIU for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Ah Ha!!!!! So this is the game that the VA is trying to play on me right now! I refused to fill out and submit a new VA 21-8940 Form again and they stated they did not have one at all in my file. I resubmitted the one I originally filed dated 5 July, 2005.

Now they only have that one VA Form 21-8940 and it is dated 5 July, 2005!

The VA stated they received my claim for individual unemployability on 26 February, 2007!!!!!! But I never submitted anything with that recent of a date on it at all, only the I/U claim dated 5 July, 2005.

So this is what they must have been trying to do to me. Had I have submitted a new VA Form 21-8940 that they sent me to fill out and return with current date on it, they would have totally ignored the claim and EED of 5 July, 2005.

The combined 70% evaluation rating is ED 11 July, 2005.

From what I have just read, the VA can still do that to me it they want to and then make me fight for an EED.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the worse game of all is when a service officer tells a vet- look you got 50% or 70% or whatever -(and the veteran is not working and has possible potential for TDIU)

So just be happy with what you got, you cannot get anything more-

I think if the vet either comes here or somehow gets a hold of a TDIU form elsewhere and sends it in- then if the vet is awarded the VA might only give the EED to date of receipt of the form-(they might however give a proper EED based on the med evidence)

but maybe the SO has caused the vet financial damages.

It is very expensive to sue for a few thousand bucks in damages-

however when lawyers rep vets after June- I think a lawyer should look for this potential too-vet rep monetary liability.and CUES in past decisions.

Another thing- too- my reps are saying my 2006 IMO was "new and material " evidence -when in fact the 2004 IMOs that they ignore-support my claim.

In my case I dont think it matters but I saw a vet they repped at the BVA.

Apparently she was in same boat with this outfit as I am-

she got a remand too but hers took much longer than mine-

She too had an IMO that these state reps ignored or at least allowed the RO to ignore.

I wonder if this IMO she had-obviously obtained prior to the BVA transfer means she would get an EED somehow depending on date of receipt of "new and material" evidence when in fact-just like me- she had sent the IMO to the RO long before the BVA transfer and they ignored hers too.

Does all that make any sense or am I just looking at her situation the wrong way?

Of course a vet can NOD anything they dont do right.

But you would think they would attempt to do things right in the first place instead of adding years and years to many claims.

I was in my POAs office one day discussing a claim I was helping them with (I actually did volunteer work for these guys-while they were messing up my claim)

and one of the reps was looking all over for a TDIU form.

He asked the boss who I was talking to- what the number of the form is-I said 21-8940-the boss didnt seem to know-

finally he found one-

this form is always on a disk at my desk and also in my favorites link-

I was pretty startled realizing that TDIU seems to be so unimportant there and it took them time to find the TDIU form.

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would the wording in the 50% diagnosis for headaches constitute infered TDIU? "With very frequent completely prostrating and prolonged attacks productive of severe economic inadaptability"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 50% under DC code 8100 is the maximum rating:

"The veteran's headaches are evaluated under the criteria set

forth at 38 C.F.R. § 4.124a, Diagnostic Code 8100. Under

this provision, migraine headaches with characteristic

prostrating attack averaging one in two months over the last

several months warrant a 10 percent rating. A 30 percent

rating is warranted for migraine headaches manifested by

characteristic prostrating attacks occurring on an average of

once a month over the last several months. A 50 percent

rating is warranted for migraine headaches with very frequent

completely prostrating and prolonged attacks, productive of

severe economic inadaptability. This is the maximum rating

available for migraine headaches pursuant to Diagnostic Code

8100."

from: http://www.va.gov/vetapp07/files1/0701643.txt

Therefore TDIU would not be an inferred issue for VA to consider-

do you have other service connected disabilties?

You can certainly apply for TDIU on the 21-8940 form and tell them of any other medical evidence you have that shows that your migraines are the cause of your unemployability.

Did the VA ever turn you down for Voc Rehab?

Do you have severe side affects of the migraine meds that cause secondary disabilities they have not considered?

Like some meds can cause GERD.

I dont think the VA can possibly award higher than the 50% for the migraines-their regs say they won't- but other secondary problems related to this disability could come into play- and support a TDIU claim.

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to have 1 disability rated at 60% or a combination totaling 70% with 1 at 40%.

However, special consoderation can be given in some cases( Extra Schedular)

50 percent is the max per rating schedule for HA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.

       

      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.

       

      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.

       

      P&T

       

      TDIU

       

       

       

      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.

       










      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.


      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.


      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law


      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual


      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures


      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation


      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

       
      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.

       

      The report is here:

      https://www.nap.edu/read/25137/chapter/2

      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.

       

       

       
      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines