Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sec. 7107. Appeals: Dockets; Hearings

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access

[wais.access.gpo.gov]

[Laws in effect as of January 7, 2003]

[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between

January 7, 2003 and December 19, 2003]

[CITE: 38USC7107]

TITLE 38--VETERANS' BENEFITS

PART V--BOARDS, ADMINISTRATIONS, AND SERVICES

CHAPTER 71--BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS

Sec. 7107. Appeals: dockets; hearings

(a)(1) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) and in

subsection (f), each case received pursuant to application for review on

appeal shall be considered and decided in regular order according to its

place upon the docket.

(2) A case referred to in paragraph (1) may, for cause shown, be

advanced on motion for earlier consideration and determination. Any such

motion shall set forth succinctly the grounds upon which the motion is

based. Such a motion may be granted only--

(A) if the case involves interpretation of law of general

application affecting other claims;

(B) if the appellant is seriously ill or is under severe

financial hardship; or

© for other sufficient cause shown.

(3) A case referred to in paragraph (1) may be postponed for later

consideration and determination if such postponement is necessary to

afford the appellant a hearing.

(b) The Board shall decide any appeal only after affording the

appellant an opportunity for a hearing.

© A hearing docket shall be maintained and formal recorded

hearings shall be held by such member or members of the Board as the

Chairman may designate. Such member or members designated by the

Chairman to conduct the hearing shall, except in the case of a

reconsideration of a decision under section 7103 of this title,

participate in making the final determination of the claim.

(d)(1) An appellant may request that a hearing before the Board be

held at its principal location or at a facility of the Department

located within the area served by a regional office of the Department.

(2) A hearing to be held within an area served by a regional office

of the Department shall (except as provided in paragraph (3)) be

scheduled to be held in accordance with the place of the case on the

docket under subsection (a) relative to other cases on the docket for

which hearings are scheduled to be held within that area.

(3) A hearing to be held within an area served by a regional office

of the Department may, for cause shown, be advanced on motion for an

earlier hearing. Any such motion shall set forth succinctly the grounds

upon which the motion is based. Such a motion may be granted only--

(A) if the case involves interpretation of law of general

application affecting other claims;

(B) if the appellant is seriously ill or is under severe

financial hardship; or

© for other sufficient cause shown.

(e)(1) At the request of the Chairman, the Secretary may provide

suitable facilities and equipment to the Board or other components of

the Department to enable an appellant located at a facility within the

area served by a regional office to participate, through voice

transmission or through picture and voice transmission, by electronic or

other means, in a hearing with a Board member or members sitting at the

Board's principal location.

(2) When such facilities and equipment are available, the Chairman

may afford the appellant an opportunity to participate in a hearing

before the Board through the use of such facilities and equipment in

lieu of a hearing held by personally appearing before a Board member or

panel as provided in subsection (d). Any such hearing shall be conducted

in the same manner as, and shall be considered the equivalent of, a

personal hearing. If the appellant declines to participate in a hearing

through the use of such facilities and equipment, the opportunity of the

appellant to a hearing as provided in such subsection (d) shall not be

affected.

(f) Nothing in this section shall preclude the screening of cases

for purposes of--

(1) determining the adequacy of the record for decisional

purposes; or

(2) the development, or attempted development, of a record found

to be inadequate for decisional purposes.

(Pub. L. 85-857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1242, Sec. 4006; renumbered

Sec. 4007, Pub. L. 87-666, Sec. 1, Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 553;

renumbered Sec. 7107, Pub. L. 102-40, title IV, Sec. 402(b)(1), May 7,

1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 103-271, Sec. 7(a)(1), July 1, 1994, 108

Stat. 742; Pub. L. 103-446, title III, Sec. 303, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat.

4658; Pub. L. 105-368, title X, Sec. 1003, Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat.

3363.)

Amendments

1998--Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(a)(1), inserted

``in paragraphs (2) and (3) and'' after ``Except as provided''.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(a)(2), added second and

third sentences and struck out former second sentence which read as

follows: ``Any such motion shall set forth succinctly the grounds upon

which it is based and may not be granted unless the case involves

interpretation of law of general application affecting other claims or

for other sufficient cause shown.''

Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(a)(3), added par. (3).

Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(b)(1), substituted ``in

accordance with the place of the case on the docket under subsection (a)

relative to other cases on the docket for which hearings are scheduled

to be held within that area.'' for ``in the order in which requests for

hearings within that area are received by the Department.''

Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(b)(2), added par. (3) and

struck out former par. (3) which read as follows: ``In a case in which

the Secretary is aware that the appellant is seriously ill or is under

severe financial hardship, a hearing may be scheduled at a time earlier

than would be provided for under paragraph (2).''

1994--Pub. L. 103-446 substituted ``Except as provided in subsection

(f), each case'' for ``Each case'' in subsec. (a)(1) and added subsec.

(f).

Pub. L. 103-271 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text

read as follows: ``All cases received pursuant to application for review

on appeal shall be considered and decided in regular order according to

their places upon the docket; however, for cause shown a case may be

advanced on motion for earlier consideration and determination. Every

such motion shall set forth succinctly the grounds upon which it is

based. No such motion shall be granted except in cases involving

interpretation of law of general application affecting other claims, or

for other sufficient cause shown.''

1991--Pub. L. 102-40 renumbered section 4007 of this title as this

section.

1962--Pub. L. 87-666 renumbered section 4006 of this title as this

section.

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/ge...Cite:+38USC7107

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use