Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
allan
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 7, 2003]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
January 7, 2003 and December 19, 2003]
[CITE: 38USC7107]
TITLE 38--VETERANS' BENEFITS
PART V--BOARDS, ADMINISTRATIONS, AND SERVICES
CHAPTER 71--BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS
Sec. 7107. Appeals: dockets; hearings
(a)(1) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) and in
subsection (f), each case received pursuant to application for review on
appeal shall be considered and decided in regular order according to its
place upon the docket.
(2) A case referred to in paragraph (1) may, for cause shown, be
advanced on motion for earlier consideration and determination. Any such
motion shall set forth succinctly the grounds upon which the motion is
based. Such a motion may be granted only--
(A) if the case involves interpretation of law of general
application affecting other claims;
(B) if the appellant is seriously ill or is under severe
financial hardship; or
© for other sufficient cause shown.
(3) A case referred to in paragraph (1) may be postponed for later
consideration and determination if such postponement is necessary to
afford the appellant a hearing.
(b) The Board shall decide any appeal only after affording the
appellant an opportunity for a hearing.
© A hearing docket shall be maintained and formal recorded
hearings shall be held by such member or members of the Board as the
Chairman may designate. Such member or members designated by the
Chairman to conduct the hearing shall, except in the case of a
reconsideration of a decision under section 7103 of this title,
participate in making the final determination of the claim.
(d)(1) An appellant may request that a hearing before the Board be
held at its principal location or at a facility of the Department
located within the area served by a regional office of the Department.
(2) A hearing to be held within an area served by a regional office
of the Department shall (except as provided in paragraph (3)) be
scheduled to be held in accordance with the place of the case on the
docket under subsection (a) relative to other cases on the docket for
which hearings are scheduled to be held within that area.
(3) A hearing to be held within an area served by a regional office
of the Department may, for cause shown, be advanced on motion for an
earlier hearing. Any such motion shall set forth succinctly the grounds
upon which the motion is based. Such a motion may be granted only--
(A) if the case involves interpretation of law of general
application affecting other claims;
(B) if the appellant is seriously ill or is under severe
financial hardship; or
© for other sufficient cause shown.
(e)(1) At the request of the Chairman, the Secretary may provide
suitable facilities and equipment to the Board or other components of
the Department to enable an appellant located at a facility within the
area served by a regional office to participate, through voice
transmission or through picture and voice transmission, by electronic or
other means, in a hearing with a Board member or members sitting at the
Board's principal location.
(2) When such facilities and equipment are available, the Chairman
may afford the appellant an opportunity to participate in a hearing
before the Board through the use of such facilities and equipment in
lieu of a hearing held by personally appearing before a Board member or
panel as provided in subsection (d). Any such hearing shall be conducted
in the same manner as, and shall be considered the equivalent of, a
personal hearing. If the appellant declines to participate in a hearing
through the use of such facilities and equipment, the opportunity of the
appellant to a hearing as provided in such subsection (d) shall not be
affected.
(f) Nothing in this section shall preclude the screening of cases
for purposes of--
(1) determining the adequacy of the record for decisional
purposes; or
(2) the development, or attempted development, of a record found
to be inadequate for decisional purposes.
(Pub. L. 85-857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1242, Sec. 4006; renumbered
Sec. 4007, Pub. L. 87-666, Sec. 1, Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 553;
renumbered Sec. 7107, Pub. L. 102-40, title IV, Sec. 402(b)(1), May 7,
1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 103-271, Sec. 7(a)(1), July 1, 1994, 108
Stat. 742; Pub. L. 103-446, title III, Sec. 303, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat.
4658; Pub. L. 105-368, title X, Sec. 1003, Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat.
3363.)
Amendments
1998--Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(a)(1), inserted
``in paragraphs (2) and (3) and'' after ``Except as provided''.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(a)(2), added second and
third sentences and struck out former second sentence which read as
follows: ``Any such motion shall set forth succinctly the grounds upon
which it is based and may not be granted unless the case involves
interpretation of law of general application affecting other claims or
for other sufficient cause shown.''
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(a)(3), added par. (3).
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(b)(1), substituted ``in
accordance with the place of the case on the docket under subsection (a)
relative to other cases on the docket for which hearings are scheduled
to be held within that area.'' for ``in the order in which requests for
hearings within that area are received by the Department.''
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 105-368, Sec. 1003(b)(2), added par. (3) and
struck out former par. (3) which read as follows: ``In a case in which
the Secretary is aware that the appellant is seriously ill or is under
severe financial hardship, a hearing may be scheduled at a time earlier
than would be provided for under paragraph (2).''
1994--Pub. L. 103-446 substituted ``Except as provided in subsection
(f), each case'' for ``Each case'' in subsec. (a)(1) and added subsec.
(f).
Pub. L. 103-271 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text
read as follows: ``All cases received pursuant to application for review
on appeal shall be considered and decided in regular order according to
their places upon the docket; however, for cause shown a case may be
advanced on motion for earlier consideration and determination. Every
such motion shall set forth succinctly the grounds upon which it is
based. No such motion shall be granted except in cases involving
interpretation of law of general application affecting other claims, or
for other sufficient cause shown.''
1991--Pub. L. 102-40 renumbered section 4007 of this title as this
section.
1962--Pub. L. 87-666 renumbered section 4006 of this title as this
section.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/ge...Cite:+38USC7107
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Apr 16
1
Top Posters For This Question
allan 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 16 2007
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts