Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Independent Medical Opinion (imo)

Rate this question


Charleese

Question

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

An IMO (Independent medical Opinion) is a written opinion by a medical professional stating that particular physicians opinion in a medical matter. In the realm of the VA an IMO can be instrumental in proving the "nexus" or connection in a veterans claim.

An IMO must have these basic things written somewhere in the wrtite-up in order for it to hold any weight in the eyes of VA;

The complete medical records was reviewed to include the veterans SMR's

Any special qualification the doctor may have, such as being board certified in a particular area ect...

A full rational for the physicians opinion as to why he/she came to a certain conclusion. This is where the physician should cite any medical litrature to support a rational.

The physician needs to use objective diagnosyic tools to support his/her opinion. The physician SHOULD NOT just rely on a subjective history presented by the veteran.

The physician should use the phrases " at least as likely as not' (meaning a 50/50 chance), "more than likely than not" (meaning 50% chance or more), or "is due to" when opining whether something is related to ones military service or related as secondary to one's already service-connected disability.

In short an IMO will probably look like a term paper one would write for a college class.

Hope this helps!

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The complete IMO criteria is here at hadit- I posted it many times-

It must contain a complete medical rationale for the opinion.

Also if you have very good internet printouts that support the medical nexus- send them to the IMO doctor as they should always incorporate a medical reference in the rationale.

Printouts are only secondary evidence and they have little weight unless a doctor uses them-

For example- in my IMO Dr. Bash quoted from Brauwald (well known Medical text)

as to the high medical probability of something-forget what- and also used the ADA literature and other medical references when he stated his rationale.

I agree with Army-tab the evidence and send an outline - also I sent prior SOCs and even VACO legal documents from 1997 to Dr. Bash.

A good IMO doctor is going to read it all but tabbing specific documents will help the focus of the claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's different levels of IMOs also. If you just randomly go to a civilian for the sole purpose of an evaluation, you're going to have a tough time with the VA; especially if that eval is to determine service connection. However, if you routinely see a civilian doctor and you're merely doing a C&P review, the VA tends to look very favorably on that because a primary doctor is far more qualified to give an opinion than a C&P doctor who's seen you once for 30 minutes or so.

But, as has been said, you need to work with that doctor to properly format your review. The funny part is that a typical C&P exam is anything but thorough and they tend to have very little information, which is highly opinionated, rather than medically driven (what can a doctor learn in a 30 min C&P exam really?). Perhaps I'm a bit skewed on this, though, because my wife's disability is mental and, therefore, highly subjective. I guess a more concrete, physical disability would be more accurately diagnosed in a single C&P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use