Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

U.s. Health Care System Is 'dysfunctional Mess,' Prominent Federal Ethicist Says

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

U.S. health care system is 'dysfunctional mess,' prominent federal ethicist says

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

CHICAGO - The U.S. health care system is "a dysfunctional mess" and politicians who insist otherwise look ignorant, according to a medical journal essay by a prominent ethicist at the National Institutes of Health.

"If a politician declares that the United States has the best health care system in the world today, he or she looks clueless rather than patriotic or authoritative," Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel wrote in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.

Emanuel, who supports sweeping health care reform, said the U.S. spends $6,000 (euro4,431) per person per year on health care, an amount that is more than 16 percent of the nation's gross domestic product and more than any other country.

He also said Americans' average life expectancy of 78 ranks 45th in the world, behind Bosnia and Jordan. And the U.S. infant death rate is 6.37 per 1,000 live births, higher than that of most developed nations.

President George W. Bush frequently has said Americans have the world's best health care system, but Emanuel stopped short of calling Bush clueless in his essay and during an interview with The Associated Press.

"I work for the federal government. You can't possibly get me to make that statement," Emanuel said in the interview.

Emanuel's proposal involves phasing out the federal health care plans Medicaid and Medicare and employer-sponsored health insurance. Under his plan, all Americans would get a basic package of insurance, would choose their insurance carrier and could buy upgraded coverage. The program would be funded by a value-added tax of about 10 percent on businesses.

Democrats and Republicans alike have made the "world's best" claim. Democrat John Kerry did so when he ran for president in 2004, as did Republican Rudy Giuliani on the presidential campaign trail this year.

David Hogberg, senior policy analyst at the National Center for Public Policy Research, said a strong case can be made that the U.S. health care system is the best.

"It depends on what measures you use," Hogberg said. Life expectancy is influenced by many factors other than health care, he said, and nations measure infant death rates inconsistently. Other measures show the United States performing well, he said.

---

On the Net:

JAMA: http://jama.ama-assn.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

"David Hogberg, senior policy analyst at the National Center for Public Policy Research, said a strong case can be made that the U.S. health care system is the best.

"It depends on what measures you use," Hogberg said. Life expectancy is influenced by many factors other than health care, he said, and nations measure infant death rates inconsistently. Other measures show the United States performing well, he said."

Translation:

It all depends on how creatively you cook the books and/or lie to the public from high places.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

>It all depends on how creatively you cook the books and/or lie to the public from high places.

Hello Sledge,

Very true.

Sure puts a spin on the phrase........."WE GOT IT"!

I hope this nation never again, experiences such pride in it's actions, when it comes to the treatment of it's troops & their families.

My best to you Sledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask a doctor from another country with universal health care just how good America's system is....to them, we are a complete joke.

The world health organization (WHO), and several other groups, have all put our health care system at around average, at best, or among the worst (depending on the group doing the study and "how" they measured the health care systems). The long and short of this is that the US DOES have the greatest health care in the world, but only for those who can afford to pay for high-end health care out-of-pocket, because the best doctors do not accept insurance. For the rest of us, health care is very dependent on luck....some areas have fairly good health care systems and some don't; it's really hit or miss.

Now, the sad part about our system is that is is ALREADY government run. EVERY business gets government kick-backs (in the form of tax breaks) to furnish their employees with health care. So, in essence, we already pay for our "private" system with tax payer money. But, conservatives like the idea of profit above all else, so our current system allows individuals to get rich off of tax payer money and gives them more companies in which to invest their already inflated bank accounts.

The solution is simple - we need a REAL universal health care system! If we were to give EVERY American health insurance (in one form or another...perhaps something like tricare, but less sucky) it would likely drive taxes up minimally, because our incomes should increase due to the lowered burden on businesses to provide the insurance (which can cost a business over $5/hr per employee).

Also, I would do away with the VA health care system ALL together (as well as medicare, tricare, etc). With EVERYONE being covered there would be no need for the bloated bureaucracies.......The VA would consist of ONLY a compensation department at that point, which would SLASH their costs by billions (which could go to deserving veterans).

One more note - a universal system should be based on income level (as to copays and such). Someone making over 500K/yr should, basically, be paying their entire medical bill (short of catastrophic claims); whereas, someone making 20K/yr should have little, or no, copays. A system like this would end up costing the average American very little because many folks currently covered would actually be paying more for insurance, but most Americans would end up paying less.

But, this will NEVER happen because it makes entirely too much sense and it take profits from the rich. Our government is nothing more than a puppet for corporate greed, so I don't expect any legislation, anytime soon, that actually HELPS Americans.

Perhaps if people actually paid attention when they voted this kind of thing could happen......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

What is so very sad to me is that people who have health insurance are in for a real shock when they try to use it. Yes these are the same people who do not want to share with others.

Not only would Universal Health Care in America save a lot of money it would provide better care for 10's of Millions, preventative care for all who wanted it and actually bail out many of the big American Companies who are drowing due to the high cost of employee and retired health plans promise years ago.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is so very sad to me is that people who have health insurance are in for a real shock when they try to use it. Yes these are the same people who do not want to share with others.

Not only would Universal Health Care in America save a lot of money it would provide better care for 10's of Millions, preventative care for all who wanted it and actually bail out many of the big American Companies who are drowing due to the high cost of employee and retired health plans promise years ago.

Sadly, the highlighted portion is the ONLY reason we'll ever see universal health care....democracy doesn't work when a select few (the rich) have a hugely disproportionate say in public policy:-( When the rich start to hurt, due to private insurance, you'll see a change in public policy......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use