Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Joints And Bones

Rate this question


les

Question

Hi Everyone, Over two years ago I was sevice conected 0% for complete fracture of my left collorbone. The bone never healed correctly. It looks like on x ray the bone grew on top of the other bone. By the way the fracture happened At Ft. Eustis Va. in 1973. It is quite deformed. At the C&P I could not lift arm out above 90%, forward and back was 25% With much pain. C&P Doctor set me up with a MRI. My Mri was done on Monday 5/14/07. I picked up my Radiological interpertation yesterday. The impression is 1. Abnormal appearance to the distal supraspinatus tendon at the attatchnent / footplate on the humeral head suggestive of full thickness tear. No tendon or muscle retraction. 2. Very small amount of subdeltoid bursa fluid and fluid adjacent to the supraspinatus tendon. 3. No other acute or significant findings. Since I have no idea what this mri means pehaps someome could please give me an idea if this can be repaired and of coarse if I might receive a better rating than 0%. Thanks to all. Les

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hello les,

What it looks like to me is, you would like a neuradiologist to give an interpretation as to what the MRI results mean & on a more probable than not bases is it service connected?

Does that sound right?

Allan

#############################################

Hi Everyone, Over two years ago I was sevice conected 0% for complete fracture of my left collorbone. The bone never healed correctly. It looks like on x ray the bone grew on top of the other bone. By the way the fracture happened At Ft. Eustis Va. in 1973. It is quite deformed. At the C&P I could not lift arm out above 90%, forward and back was 25% With much pain. C&P Doctor set me up with a MRI. My Mri was done on Monday 5/14/07. I picked up my Radiological interpertation yesterday. The impression is 1. Abnormal appearance to the distal supraspinatus tendon at the attatchnent / footplate on the humeral head suggestive of full thickness tear. No tendon or muscle retraction. 2. Very small amount of subdeltoid bursa fluid and fluid adjacent to the supraspinatus tendon. 3. No other acute or significant findings. Since I have no idea what this mri means pehaps someome could please give me an idea if this can be repaired and of coarse if I might receive a better rating than 0%. Thanks to all. Les
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Allen. The C&P doctor was a bone and joint Dr. Hopefully he will include due to service conection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Les-it takes a few weeks for the C & P report to be typed up.

You can get a copy of it by writing to the Records Access Officer at your VAMC and request it-give them your C file number on the request.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Les,

Who told you it did not heal correctly. Also, I see no mention as to any relationship between the current condition and the break in 1973. I am no doctor. However, I think it is common to allow the collar bone to heal in the manner you described. They probably did not mention the lack of any relationship as to not tip you off as to how to advance a claim and thus delay the process. They also might think that the current condition is secondary to a recent injury and just did not tell you this to keep you from going ballistic at the doctor. VA examiners get a lot of flack from veterans sometimes during an exam.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Les,

Who told you it did not heal correctly. Also, I see no mention as to any relationship between the current condition and the break in 1973. I am no doctor. However, I think it is common to allow the collar bone to heal in the manner you described. They probably did not mention the lack of any relationship as to not tip you off as to how to advance a claim and thus delay the process. They also might think that the current condition is secondary to a recent injury and just did not tell you this to keep you from going ballistic at the doctor. VA examiners get a lot of flack from veterans sometimes during an exam.

Hi, No one told me the collar bone did not heal correctly. I saw the xrays at the C&p and it is one bone on top of another. I assumed it did not heal correctly. With the MRI I am hopefull they can conect this secondary to weakness im my shoulder due to the fractured clavicle. Thanks!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Les,

Who told you it did not heal correctly. Also, I see no mention as to any relationship between the current condition and the break in 1973. I am no doctor. However, I think it is common to allow the collar bone to heal in the manner you described. They probably did not mention the lack of any relationship as to not tip you off as to how to advance a claim and thus delay the process. They also might think that the current condition is secondary to a recent injury and just did not tell you this to keep you from going ballistic at the doctor. VA examiners get a lot of flack from veterans sometimes during an exam.

Thanks for the comeback Hoppy! They are trying to link my deformed Clavicle to the shoulder problems as secondary. The C&P was sent back to Philadelphia Va center on 17 May 07.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use