Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dro Filibuster

Rate this question


Dorothy Kansas

Question

I got my decision last week and my jaw dropped denied on all issues. The thing that makes this so funny was all my Drs thought I had good supporting evidence and medical opinions. This renegade DRO made a mockery out of the equipoise law by requesting opinions that had nothing to do with the issue. He twisted the words of one of my IMO's. Now he is requesting that I be reduced just to stop me from receiving SMC.

At what level can we bring an attorney in: this guy is an attorney with some medical training and I need some help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

"This renegade DRO made a mockery out of the equipoise law by requesting opinions that had nothing to do with the issue."

Dorothy- did you get copies of those VA opinions?

I would get copies of them and then combat every single thing in them that you can -

is it possible that you can get your own IMO doctors to expand on their opinions?

I would send them a copy of whatever the decision said that seemed to ignore these positive opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta-- yes, i have all of the medical evidence for and against. I showed one of my Doctors what was written by the renegade and he laughed and immediately countered with more proof. I had one good PFT and this guy wants to reduce even though I am on 02 continously. H e had a another Pulmonologist who has never examined me state I didn't need Oxygen. i had a over night test done and my oxygen level average was 83 without oxygen. My blood pressure shot up to 196/98 with pulse of 133 and I had excruiating chest pain. I am showing all of the Doctors my decision and let them decide how thery want to handle it. This ---hole even said I couldn't submit more evidence and that there was no one who could overturn his decision. his supervisors admits that if my case goes to the Bva it would be remanded. Can I request a Administrative review for grievious error

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would CUE it AND appeal it. I know many people here say you cannot CUE unless a decision has exhausted all appeals, but I have been told otherwise by several people inside of the Seattle RO and currently have my wife's claim in for DRO AND two seperate CUEs in as well.

I'm not claiming to be right on this issue, as my wife's claims have not gone through yet (only been a couple weeks), but the worst they can say is no and throw the CUEs in the trash, but, if I'm right, you can attack on two fronts and your claim will be able to go through another seperate person inside the RO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta-- yes, i have all of the medical evidence for and against. I showed one of my Doctors what was written by the renegade and he laughed and immediately countered with more proof. I had one good PFT and this guy wants to reduce even though I am on 02 continously. H e had a another Pulmonologist who has never examined me state I didn't need Oxygen. i had a over night test done and my oxygen level average was 83 without oxygen. My blood pressure shot up to 196/98 with pulse of 133 and I had excruiating chest pain. I am showing all of the Doctors my decision and let them decide how thery want to handle it. This ---hole even said I couldn't submit more evidence and that there was no one who could overturn his decision. his supervisors admits that if my case goes to the Bva it would be remanded. Can I request a Administrative review for grievious error

Dorothy- this DRO sounds power crazy-

You can request an Administratrive Review-

I did that years ago only so that I could find someone at VA who knew how to read-it worked-

Then again- he sounds like he is going against DRO guidelines-

I suggest that before considering an Admin review-(it has to be filed with VACO)

perhaps a service complaint via the Query page at the VA web site- Put Attention Director (or Manager) VARO on it-

or a letter to their director- stating what is going on and that might help get this resolved sooner than an Admin. Review-

If he thinks no one can overturn him- he is wrong-

Dont forget - I got a stupid wannabee DRO denial copy and paste decision overturned in days-what I mean is

I am now getting a real DRO review-after I complained to the DRO's boss- the VARO Manager and sent the VARO the DRO job description.

He cannot -as I understand the DRO procedure, even attempt to reduce your benefits.

I see in the DRO job description NOTHING that gives the VA the right not to accept new evidence.

Also- have you checked over 38 USC 5107 carefully-

when I emailed my service complaint I stated that my rights were violated by the DRO under 38 USC 5107 and I also stated how that violation occurred.I really raised hell.

Another thing I just thought of- when the supervisor said it would be remanded anyway by the BVA- there seems to be support there for your problem.

If the supervisor filed the Admin Review for you,in your behalf, that would be great.

Administrative Reviews are usually always requested by VARO employees- not by claimants-but in 1997 I said what the heck- I am dealing with illiterates at my VARO- lets see what happens if I file it.A VA lawyer called me about it within days.

I was in an unusal position however-VACO already knew of my claim-

If a service complaint or certified letter to this VAROs director (or manager) doesnt get results-

I will see what I can do as to helping you file the Administrative Review-

It is just that- it takes more time on the claim-when the people who can get this guy to do his job properly are right there at that VARO. If he is a vet-I wonder if he was like this in the military.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got a cut and paste DRO Review as well. I asked for a hearing and I got what I wanted in 20 minutes of face-to-face. The VA just makes work for themselves with these half-ass reviews. Their incompetence just hurts the veterans and increases the number of appeals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use