Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

What's A Joint Motion? Mandate?

Rate this question


Angela

Question

A BVA decision I'm referencing in my CUE mentions a Joint Motion by the veteran and General Council, goes on to say that "The joint motion has become the mandate of the court." and then says

"A lower tribunal, upon receiving the mandate of an appellate court, may not alter, amend, or examine the mandate, or give further relief or review, but must enter an order in strict compliance with the mandate... The "mandate rule," as it is known, is nothing more than a specific application of the "law of the case" doctrine.

Here's a link to the decision... http://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files4/9935947.txt

Can anyone tell me what this means in plain English? And if I can use it in my CUE motion ? Or does it only apply to the case it's written in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am no lawyer but a joint motion would only be an agreement on an issiue or issues and doubtfully would be of any value as a precedent except to show that at least somewhere the VA has agreed to it.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A BVA decision I'm referencing in my CUE mentions a Joint Motion by the veteran and General Council, goes on to say that "The joint motion has become the mandate of the court." and then says

"A lower tribunal, upon receiving the mandate of an appellate court, may not alter, amend, or examine the mandate, or give further relief or review, but must enter an order in strict compliance with the mandate... The "mandate rule," as it is known, is nothing more than a specific application of the "law of the case" doctrine.

Here's a link to the decision... http://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files4/9935947.txt

Can anyone tell me what this means in plain English? And if I can use it in my CUE motion ? Or does it only apply to the case it's written in?

I couldn't find these terms in that decision-

however the only Precedential Opinions I know of are either from General Counsel or from the US CAVC.

Even a few of these have been altered too by subsequent situations- but

it is always the best bet- if a precedential opinion or CAVC opinion would help a claim, to send it in with the claim-

A CUE claim isn't a motion- it is a claim just like all other claims- but it relies on VA case law and regs existing at time of the alledged CUE and an improper application of those regs-in a final VA decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

You mention BVA case law. By that do you mean prior decisions made by the BVA? The ones I've been searching through at the Board of Appeals? If so, is that just the ones before my rating or does it include everthing out there?

Thanks again for educating me!

Angela

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/files1/9402917.txt

In this Cova case it explains that the joint motion refers to seperate issues that were refered for remand from the same case and was mandated by the court to do specific things in the remand.

Reading the case may explain it better than I can. Their are three seperate diaabilities the Veteran was asking for, and more than one of them was remanded in the motion by the court and stated what should happen during the remand as mandated by the court.

Hope this helps you further.

Jim S. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use