Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

And / Or

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

This isn't really an issue with the VA -- at least not at this time - but could be for others..

What is your interpretation of the use of and/or.

If someone says you must do this and / or that...

Are thay saying either or both?

My concern is I don't want to do this.

But if I do that --they will focus on the AND (i.e. we said both)

But if I object to them trying to do this --they will focus on the OR (i.e. we said this OR that..we didn't try to MAKE you do this..)

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

And/or can mean "in addition to" or "in the place of". So, baseball, basketball and/or football would mean any combination of those 3 or any single one alone. It's supposed to be a flexible phrase, but I can see your point how the VA could abuse it (I've seen it done with PTSD).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's like writting a check if you put Mr. AND Mrs. Both must sign if you

Put Mr. OR Mrs. either one can sign. So I would say if they write down OR than it would be either one if they write down AND they would mean both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sorry I should have add this in my last post. It is also a legal term when writting anything legal like a Will, Insurance ext. AND means all parties OR means either parties. The best way to understand And / Or is my example of your checking account or savings account And means BOTH Or means Either one must sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! I have been doing some battling with an insurance company over a statement they want me to sign.

The most current letter said "if we don't receive a signed and dated statement" and / or hear from you in the next 30 days, we will close the claim.'

The authorization they want me to sing actually STATES "“ I understand that I may refuse to sign this authorization and that XXXX does not condition payment of a claim for benefits on whether or not I sign this authorization.â€

But I get the feeling they are putting me in a catch - 22 -- If I raise heck that they are trying to force me to sign a statement that SAYS I am not required to sign it - they can come back with "We said OR hear from you - we didn't try to MAKE you sign it." But if I don't sign it and they hear from me - they can say "WE said AND sign the statement."

Free

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free,

Insurance companies are good for phrass like that. They need you to contact them within the the timeframe they stated, (but really do want you to sign the paper, but can't force you so the have to give you the option to contact them instead). I would call them, then follow up with an email or fax so you have a dated proof of a contact date. I would also ask them why they want you to sign the statement.

Good Luck,

Tamara

PS. I don't like insurance companies....I'm still fighting a bill from my surgey from 2005, for an in-patient (no co-pay) that they keep saying was an out patient doctor and wnt me to pay the balance of 109K......imagine that!!! Let me just get out my checkbook :lol:

Have a great day!!!

tdak

"Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other. "...Ronald Reagan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use