Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Soft Tissues Sarcomas And Ao

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Forgive me me if this posts reflects my frustration- I just got email asking me to tell all vet orgs etc this big news-a dead Nam vet with brain tumor got SC due to AO.

It isnt big news-

I have failed to make this point I guess to this former member-

The VA service connects all soft tissue sarcomas in Vietnam vets (in country) as also the Korean vets on the DMZ unit list-

It doesnt matter where the cancer is- as long as it is a STS -soft tissue sarcoma it is presumptive.

Here is the STS list:

Soft tissue sarcoma is among the diseases listed under 38

C.F.R. § 3.309(e) for which service connection may be

presumed as a consequence of exposure to Agent Orange under

38 U.S.C.A. § 1116 and 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307(a)(6) and 3.309(e).

The soft-tissue sarcomas to which the presumption applies are

limited to the following: adult fibrosarcoma;

dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans; malignant fibrous

histiocytoma; liposarcoma; leiomyosarcoma; epithelioid

leiomyosarcoma (malignant leiomyoblastoma); rhabdomyosarcoma;

ectomesenchymoma; angiosarcoma (hemangiosarcoma and

lymphangiosarcoma); proliferating (systemic)

angioendotheliomatosis; malignant glomus tumor; malignant

hemangiopericytoma; synovial sarcoma (malignant synovioma);

malignant giant cell tumor of tendon sheath; malignant

schwannoma, including malignant schwannoma with

rhabdomyoblastic differentiation (malignant Triton tumor),

glandular, and epithelioid malignant schwannomas; malignant

mesenchymoma; malignant granular cell tumor; alveolar soft

part sarcoma; epithelioid sarcoma; clear cell sarcoma of

tendons and aponeuroses; extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma;

congenital and infantile fibrosarcoma; and malignant

ganglioneuroma. 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(e)

If any type of AO cancer that is lisated separately in the AO list is NOT this type of cancer the claim will be denied as the MOPH recently found out when they assured a widow her AO claim would succeed because her husaband AO vet-died of lung cancer.

It was not of any type on the STS list.

I just ran into a Nam vet who told me he still had not filed his claim yet as he doesn't understand whether he has an STS cancer or not.

Colon cancer.

I told him the same thing I said about 2 years ago -go through your medical records or just ask your doctor if the cancer falls into a STS type of AO cancer.He hasnt done that at all yet .

It doesn't matter where the cancer is-if it is STS type it is presumed SC due to AO exposure. I just read a recent BVA decision granting SC for cancer of the wrist. The Vet was in Vietnam and had made sure that he put the STS name of the cancer into his claim and the VA could confirm this in his VA med recs.

MANY MANY MANY vet reps dont have a clue on the STS cancers- I bet reps right this minute somewhere are telling a vet no you arent on the AO presumptive list-without even considering the big long STS list.They are too lazy to read it.

Rhabdomyosarcomas for example can grow in the neck, head, wrist, in any soft tissue.

A vet who files as Nam vet exposed to AO for cancer of the neck- is going to be denied.

The VA is not going to take the time to run down the AO STS list and also search through the vets med recs to make the link.

A vet who was AO exposed -who files for soft tissue sarcoma of rhabdomyosarcoma type-affecting his neck and head will succeed.The VA will have to confirm he has an STS cancer but this is presumptive and his claim will be granted.

These claims take asking the doctor what type of cancer it is and then making sure that the terms used in the med recs are the same ones that the VA recognises.

Or searching through the med recs for the description of the cancer.

There can be numerous ways STS cancers are identified but find just one of the STS names on the AO list above- and this gets the award in a Vietnam exposed vet.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Berta:

As you know I was denied my claim for AO. I was dignosed with Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma (malignent tumor on the right tonsil that had metastisized into the lymphnodes). My Oncology ENT gave me a letter stating he strongly believed this cancer started in Vietnam. I served on the DMZ with the 4/7 Cavalry (2nd Infantry) in Korea and of course Vietnam/Cambodia I was denied with the VA saying my cancer is not on the presumptive list of cancers. I did check awhile back after one of your post of the soft tissue cancers and didn`t think it matched with mine. My doctor did also state the dioxins I was sprayed with many many times did have to travel thru my throat to get to the other parts on the list.

I am getting the 100% payment now for other things, but I do worry everyday about dying of this bullshit and my wife not getting a dimes worth of help.

Cavman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cavman I hope you nodded the denial anyhow- that list of AO disabilities could grow-

When I first started out dealing with VA there were only 2 AO conditions- PN-with a highly limiting criteria and chloracne which was very hard to get SC for also-

But the AO Settlement Fund of 1991 against Dow, etc-only required service in Nam and a 100% disability regardless of cause-SC or NSC to become class action member and get sent some of the lawsuit money.

The AO presumptive list has grown and I feel it will continue to grow.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use