Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Camp Lejuene Contamination

Rate this question


Berta

Question

emailed from Colonel Dan:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070611/ap_on_...aGcPM29Qd52wPIE

"U.S. health officials here in Atlanta hope to finish a long-awaited study by year's end to examine whether the water tainted with solvents affected the health of children. It will influence the Pentagon's response to at least 850 pending legal claims by people who lived at the Marine base, officials said. The former residents, who together seek nearly $4 billion, believe their families were afflicted by water containing industrial solvents before the Marines shut off the bad wells in the mid-1980s."

(I wonder if they used the AO there to keep the OQs from being overgrown.) Then again the article says this:

"The scrutiny comes as federal regulators consider whether to tighten restrictions on solvents known as TCE, trichloroethylene, and PCE, tetrachloroethylene, common contaminants at military and private industrial sites. The chemicals were highlighted in a 1998 movie starring John Travolta, "A Civil Action," about a lawsuit against corporate polluters in Woburn, Mass"

Great movie -just like Love Canal situation-years and years of illnesses before any action took place to resolve---

And the movie "China Syndrome" was released the very same week of the Three Mile Island incident.

Fiction can often precede fact.

I feel any Marine situated at Le Jeune with disability of themselves or their families -who used the wells as only source of water- should get an IMO from an Environmental medical expert as to whether the contaminated water at the Camp caused their illnesses.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I submitted a claim to the federal tort claim litigation on a Standard form 95 January of 2007, Since, they have answered and in essence they told me that since I was on active duty at the time I could not claim. they cited Feres v.US, 340 US 135 (1940. Any advice?

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I have the best advice for you and you can take it to the bank!!!!

Contact this law firm:

Anderson Weber & Henry, P.C.

Trial Lawyers

And Law Offices of Michael J. Pangia

233 West Mountain Street

Kernersville, NC 27284

Toll Free 1-866-993-7958 and ask for MS Courtney South Ext. 106.

This is the firm that is representing Camp Lejeune victims and they fill out the Form 95 for you and send it to you for your signature.

I don't know if they have cut if off, but call and see. I am included in the 850 and my letter from them states they are suing for $4M on my behalf and $4M on behalf of my deceased infant son. All total they are suing for $4B. They told me they can prove it beyond a doubt by using DNA and it will show the toxins from the contaminated water. I think I will be lucky to get $25 to tell you the truth and that is on the high side.

I filed a claim with the VA, sending them all the facts of the Camp Lejeune records and by gastrointestinal problems and Barrett's esophagus were denied. The VA said there is absolutely no connection nor any evidence linking my GI problems or Barrett's Esophagus to the water contamination.

So we will see, but it should be settled within two years. This firm also were able to obtain classified documents from the EPA report that showed the high levels of 70 times allowable and also the DoD letter ordering the EPA to change those numbers to lower figures. The law firm got a specialist firm out of Europe to go to Camp Lejeune last year and test those wells and provide the results. Guess what, the Marine Corps and DoD lied again, the levels last year of the closed wells still exceeded 70 times the safe allowable amounts.

I too was a Marine in the 3rdBn, 2nd Mar, 2ndMarDiv at Camp Lejeune and I was told the same thing as you, that military cannot file. But, this law firm can file on your behalf and on the behalf of your dependents. So that is how you beat the government at their own SF 95 game.

Keep your fingers crossed. Good luck. Hope you can still get in but keep in mine they have it down to already just 850 they are representing and asking for $4B on their behalf's. I wouldn't mine if you get some of mine, but I don't know about the others or if added claimants reduce the others amounts. Just don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep calling the toll free number as many times as you have to and make sure you get Courtney's extension. If still no reply just use the toll free number and tell whoever answers the phone that you have been trying to contact Courtney and she has not returned your messages.

They are very busy. I had to keep calling and calling, but finally she called me back and interviewed me. Then they sent a draft SF 95 for me to make any corrections. I sent that back and then they sent me a completed SF 95 that I signed and returned to them.

Stay on the phone until you get hold of her. That's what I did. They have a specific way they fill out the SF 95. In a class action suit such as this, it is the Law Firm that divvies up the money, not the government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More info here:

http://www.tceblog.com/posts/1181727674.shtml

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/sites/lejeune/faq_water.html

http://timethief.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/...s-camp-lejeune/

Lots of current info as well as the CBS and Katy Couric videos on this-

I believe the suits are not against the military at all (Feres Doctrine) but are class actions against the makers and/or suppliers of the TCE contaminants.

Just like AO-

The suit was against Dow Chem and the other manufacturers of the AO-

the mil could not be sued for using it.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use