Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Simultaneously Contested Claim

Rate this question


les

Question

I had a denial from a dro appeal. The ssoc says If you wish to respond you have 60 days from the date of this letter to respond (or 30 days if this is a "simultaneoously contested claim). You can simply write and to tell us in your own words what you disagree with in this ssoc and why. Will they look at this denial again at the dro level instead of going to the bva.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Les,

The only way the DRO will take another look at your claim is if you submit new evidence within the 60 days of the SOC/SSOC. If you do this the DRO will review the new evidence to determine whether it warrants a grant in benefits sought on appeal or if a further denial is warranted. If the new evidence does not compel the DRO to grant the benefits sought on appeal, he/she will issues a SSOC outlining why the new evidence wasn't enought to grant your claim. The SSOC will only address the new evidence submitted! If the DRO is able to grant your appeal, they will issue a rating decision outlining their decision.

If you do not or are unable to submit new evidence and want to continue your appeal to the BVA, you must send in the VA Form 9 within 60 days of the date of the SOC/SSOC. DO NOT MISS THE 60 DAYS, otherwise, your claim is dead and youloose your effective date!

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Les,

The only way the DRO will take another look at your claim is if you submit new evidence within the 60 days of the SOC/SSOC. If you do this the DRO will review the new evidence to determine whether it warrants a grant in benefits sought on appeal or if a further denial is warranted. If the new evidence does not compel the DRO to grant the benefits sought on appeal, he/she will issues a SSOC outlining why the new evidence wasn't enought to grant your claim. The SSOC will only address the new evidence submitted! If the DRO is able to grant your appeal, they will issue a rating decision outlining their decision.

If you do not or are unable to submit new evidence and want to continue your appeal to the BVA, you must send in the VA Form 9 within 60 days of the date of the SOC/SSOC. DO NOT MISS THE 60 DAYS, otherwise, your claim is dead and youloose your effective date!

Vike 17

Thanks Vike, I have to ask being this appeal was at DRO for 3 years and I have sent in a simultaneously contested claim. Will this be looked at soon or on the shelf for more years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To clarify- you dont have a simultaneously contested claim Les.

This situation can arise when a vet has 2 wives and didnt divorce the first wife-and dies and both women apply for DIC-

or he DID divorce the first wife and the divorced wife as well as the present wife files DIC claim.

Also this situation can arise when the VA determines an apportionment of a vets comp be given to a spouse:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files1/9702230.txt

"When a person having preferred entitlement dies, forfeits entitlement or otherwise becomes disqualified before receiving and negotiating the check for his/her share of the accrued benefit, pay the next person entitled based on relationship or reimbursement, if a claim is timely filed.

Simultaneous claims from persons with different preference status are not considered as contested claims."

Reference: For more information on contested claims, see M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart vi, 6 (TBD) or M21-1, Part IV, Chapter 5

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use