Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

38 Usc 5110 (g)

Rate this question


donnie

Question

Hi, everyone. Does anyone know if this regulation applies to prostate cancer cases related to Agent Orange? I applied for prostate cancer disability benefits approximately five months after my prostate cancer surgery. I was approved for disability, but the effective date was the date VA received the claim. I assumed the effective date would be the date of the cancer diagnosis or the surgery. Does anyone believe 5110 (g) could apply in my case? Section 5110 (g) states that it "authorizes awards retroactive for as much as one year from date of receipt of claims when awards are made 'pursuant to any Act or administrative issue" . I appreciate any help on this particular regulation or any other one that offers help in my situation. Several thousand dollars are at stake here since 100% disability benefits are normally granted for the first 6 months of the recuperation after prostate cancer surgery. Thank you! Donnie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

The VCAA letter says on top

IMPORTANT- REPLY REQUESTED

and then it spells out clearly what evidence you need to send VA to succeed in your claim.

It comes with an election form where the vet checks one of 2 boxes-

yes I want decision made on what you have or no I have more evidenve- or words to that affect-

dont have one in front of me-

The Dingess Hartmann enhanced the VCAA letter-

VA should have clearly informed you of the EED you could expect in the VCAA notice-

it certainly looks to me that you received these letters so all above might help someone else-

but

what is the significance of the Jan 2006 date that VA gave you?

and what was the date of diagnosis and subsequent surgery?

How much time is left to file a NOD?

meaning what is the date of the VA award letter?

"Several thousand dollars are at stake here since 100% disability benefits are normally granted for the first 6 months of the recuperation after prostate cancer surgery."

Yes in most cases based on the clinical record and evidence that convalescence is required.

Do you have a service officer?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, Thank you for your help- it's great! I was diagnosed in May, 2005. Had surgery in August, 2005. Didn't apply until Jan 2006 - out of ignorance- not realizing the effective date would be the date VA receives the claim, not the date I was diagnosed or had surgery. For prostate cancer surgery, VA is authorized to pay 100% disability for 6 months following surgery. I was allowed only 1 month since the effective date was based on receipt of the claim, not the date of surgery or diagnosis. This is a double hit since I not only lose 5 months of VA, but I also lose 5 months of CRSC (Combat Related Specialty Compensation).My understanding is that both CRSC and VA benefits apply when 100% disability benefits are involved. That's why several thousand dollars are involved because of a ruling based on an administrative date instead of medical diagnosis/surgery date (the actual disability date). Again, I'm not asking for years of back benefits, I'm merely asking for benefits based on the date of surgery. That's why I inquired about the possibility of getting the effective date backed up based on 5110 (g) or through any other means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, some additional answers to your questions. I have until June 2008 for the NOD. The DAV has been my service officer, but their help has been very limited. Thank you again, Donnie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YOW CRSC too?

This DOES involve $$$$$.

Did you read my post to Donnie and AO vets re: Nehmer?

Did the VA state in any way that your claim was adjudicated under the Nehmer court order?

I wish you could post the decision-Sec 5110 helps you but only as it is regarded under Nehmer-

Were you diagnosed at a VA itself -

and do you get SSA disability benefits-

and if so-are they for the SC conditions?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use