Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What's Up With This Iris Reply?

Rate this question


jessie0054

Question

Hello:

Just got this reply from IRIS this evening.

My son was serviced connected at 0% for Polycythemia Vera [ a Bone Marrow disease] and we sent a Letter for reconsideration in the rate which they recieved on May 9th.

For this disease and recieving Phlebotomies he should be rated at 40%.

I have since sent 2 recent Phlebotomy records.

Last week my sons SO said that someone in the St. Louis RO had his file working on it and he expected a decision fairly soon.

Today the IRIS reply said that his claim had been sent for a possible Exam and he would be contacted by the closest VA if an Exam is needed.and gave the 1-800 number.

What more could they need? They did the C&P and i have filed all his Phlebotomy records showing his disease is active. :D :blink:

He was already service connected for the disease, Was just asking for them to give the proper rate!!

Jessie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

That C & P should give him another good shot for a ratable percentage.

what gets me is they said a 'possible' exam.

Maybe they are getting a VA medical opinion that would not require a physical exam to be done.

Again- as I assume he already had one C & P prior to the "0" rating ?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That C & P should give him another good shot for a ratable percentage.

what gets me is they said a 'possible' exam.

Maybe they are getting a VA medical opinion that would not require a physical exam to be done.

Again- as I assume he already had one C & P prior to the "0" rating ?

Thanks Berta:

I just don't understand what more they could want to make the decision to give him the 40% rate or leave him at the 0%. They have 3 Dr's giving him a Diagnosis, One being the VA C&P examiner. They have phlebotomy records for the last 5 years and now finally a standing order for a phlebotomy every 4-6 weeks.

I came across an interesting decision on the Board of Veterans Affairs Appeals on a case very near my son's case.

Citation # 0703559

Decision date 02/05/07 Archive date 02/14/07

Docket # 00-06 476

This case was on appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs office in Hartford Connecticut.

If i'm reading this right this Veteran was given a 40% rate, raised from 10% because he had had a CBC not a phlebotomy. But due to the defination of a CBC by the US National Institute of Health, A CBC is defined as a phlebotomy.

Would this case be good to submit in my son's case?

Thanks, Jessie :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jessie,

You would think if a veteran is already service connected the process would be a lot simpler. But not so. I'm sc at 0% also. Medical evidence is there. Nevertheless, I have already had two rating examinations since I filed my claim in 2003 without a break in the process. You have to remember that VARO is not trying to pay out benefits. The purpose of a rating exam is there last ditch effort to keep a vet at 0% or not sc him/her at all.

The following is a link to the disability worksheet the examiner will use, if your son should be scheduled for a rating exam. Hope it helps in showing you what the VARO is looking for to award or not award the 40%.

http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Benefits/exams/disexm29.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jessie,

You would think if a veteran is already service connected the process would be a lot simpler. But not so. I'm sc at 0% also. Medical evidence is there. Nevertheless, I have already had two rating examinations since I filed my claim in 2003 without a break in the process. You have to remember that VARO is not trying to pay out benefits. The purpose of a rating exam is there last ditch effort to keep a vet at 0% or not sc him/her at all.

The following is a link to the disability worksheet the examiner will use, if your son should be scheduled for a rating exam. Hope it helps in showing you what the VARO is looking for to award or not award the 40%.

http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Benefits/exams/disexm29.htm

:D Thanks luvhim

I downloaded the worksheet just incase he has to have another exam. I just don't know what they want MORE BLOOD :blink:

Thanks, Jessie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use