Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Smc=s

Rate this question


Question

Posted

can a veteran with 100% for one disability and a combination of 70% for a few other disabilities get SMC-S. Are there any other requirements or is it automatic? :huh:

Thanks

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Posted

Big Papa

Thanks for the cfr info it will come in handy in case the VA forgets to give me the S

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Big PaPa:

Welcome to Hadit. Would that mean that if the VA did not pay until years later that they would be guilty of CUE and have to pay retro to the time Veteran was eligible?

Thanks you made something vague easy to understand.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Posted (edited)
Big PaPa:

Welcome to Hadit. Would that mean that if the VA did not pay until years later that they would be guilty of CUE and have to pay retro to the time Veteran was eligible?

Thanks you made something vague easy to understand.

Pete53:

Thank-you for welcoming me.

A clear and unmistakable errors is very specific and the BVA (as-well-as the RO) tend to keep a close eye on.

Essentially a clear and unmistakable error is a result of (gross) oversite by the VA Rating Specialist, DRO or the BVA where the evidence of record needed to grant a claim was overlooked or the regulatory provisions (VA laws, rule and regulations) were not accurately applied.

ie. File an original claim (OC) for x disability and was denied. Re-file years later for x disability with the SAME evidence used in the prior denial and this claim is granted, it is then considered a CUE and retro pay to original date of the (denied ) claim.

In a nut-shell 38 CFR 20.1403 states that if a claim results in an unfavorable decision due to VA overlooking the evidence or erroneously applying VA law will then result in a CUE and only then is retro pay dates to the OC.

Edited by Big Papa
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Thanks PaPa

You said

In a nut-shell 38 CFR 20.1403 states that if a claim results in an unfavorable decision due to VA overlooking the evidence or erroneously applying VA law will then result in a CUE and only then is retro pay dates to the OC.

Last December I requested SMC for Housebound, It was granted and I appealed. In 1996 the VARO had ruled that I was 100% P&T for Panic Disorder. It is true that my health is not as good as it was in 1996. However when I read the regulation it seems that the VA should have considered housebound as the reason I was awarded 100% was due to agoraphobia. Although I am grateful for the SMC award I have always wanted to know why it was not considered in 1996.

If they backdated it the award would go back to 1993. John9999 and I have gone back and forth for years that we should ask for Housebound due to agoraphobia. By the way my SO advised me the Housebound was a loser but gave me the form so that I could file anyway,

I really want you to feel welcome on this Board and I will try to help you have a pleasant time here. I hope that you are aware that some Members have had bad experience with SO's and have a dim view of anyone who is one but over the years we have had some pretty good ones hang out and give some good advice.

I know that sometimes getting good info is not what someone wants to hear but the purpose of this Board is to help Veterans with their claims. Sometimes this involves laying out some bad news.

It is also perfect ably acceptable to disagree and lay out arguments as long as it does not devolve into personal attacks. So hang in there and hopefully stick around cause this Board needs people like you for guidance

Pete

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use