Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Writ Of Mandamus

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

B) Is anyone interested in a Writ of Mandamus that I wrote? If I get enough people interested, I am considering posting it even tho I do not know if it is "successful" or not because I just filed it last week. I am not a lawyer, but this is my take on the writ:

It is for "extrordinary measures", not just your plain garden variety claims. I filed a writ, in part, because the VARO in Cleveland took absolutely NO action on my NOD filed in March, 2004. No Statement of Case, no nothing. In the Writ, I am seeking to Compel the VARO to make a decision on an informal claim filed in July, 2002.

The Writ is when nothing else works. If you are unhappy with the Regional Office decision, file a NOD, not a writ. If it has been more than a year since your RO decision, then you need to try to prove CUE, as an appeal on a claim where the decision was more than a year ago will fail, unless you can prove CUE. If you are unhappy with a BVA decision, file an appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims.

In my particular case, I received a very favorable decision from the BVA but the Cleveland RO simply failed to implement it. It makes no sense to appeal a decision favorable to the Veteran. However, when the Regional Office takes it upon themself to attempt to circumvent the law by just "blowing off" the BVA, I feel the writ was justified.

The courts have ruled that the "VA is not free to ignore its own regulations". :P In my writ, I am suggesting it is the Court of Veterans Claims that is the "police" for the VARO to compel them to follow their own laws.

By the way, I have had a difference of opinion with some people on here, which turned into some rather heated posts. If these individuals elect to use these posts as a way to further cut me down, all of you :D will pay, as I simply will not post the writ which may well do a lot of you some good, especially if nothing else has worked with your claim. I am here to try to help other Veterans, and I am not all that interested in defending myself from people who wish to attack me. Yes, I think there are definately some changes to the status quo that need to be made, and I have expressed opinions on some of these changes that have ruffled a few feathers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • Founder

if you decide to post your writ please make sure to delete any personal identifying information.

my opinion is you should wait to see if it wins, that way the writ you put up can be perfected.

B) Is anyone interested in a Writ of Mandamus that I wrote? If I get enough people interested, I am considering posting it even tho I do not know if it is "successful" or not because I just filed it last week. I am not a lawyer, but this is my take on the writ:

It is for "extrordinary measures", not just your plain garden variety claims. I filed a writ, in part, because the VARO in Cleveland took absolutely NO action on my NOD filed in March, 2004. No Statement of Case, no nothing. In the Writ, I am seeking to Compel the VARO to make a decision on an informal claim filed in July, 2002.

The Writ is when nothing else works. If you are unhappy with the Regional Office decision, file a NOD, not a writ. If it has been more than a year since your RO decision, then you need to try to prove CUE, as an appeal on a claim where the decision was more than a year ago will fail, unless you can prove CUE. If you are unhappy with a BVA decision, file an appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims.

In my particular case, I received a very favorable decision from the BVA but the Cleveland RO simply failed to implement it. It makes no sense to appeal a decision favorable to the Veteran. However, when the Regional Office takes it upon themself to attempt to circumvent the law by just "blowing off" the BVA, I feel the writ was justified.

The courts have ruled that the "VA is not free to ignore its own regulations". :P In my writ, I am suggesting it is the Court of Veterans Claims that is the "police" for the VARO to compel them to follow their own laws.

By the way, I have had a difference of opinion with some people on here, which turned into some rather heated posts. If these individuals elect to use these posts as a way to further cut me down, all of you :D will pay, as I simply will not post the writ which may well do a lot of you some good, especially if nothing else has worked with your claim. I am here to try to help other Veterans, and I am not all that interested in defending myself from people who wish to attack me. Yes, I think there are definately some changes to the status quo that need to be made, and I have expressed opinions on some of these changes that have ruffled a few feathers.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Most Writs win but not officially. They make the VA move and make a decision. The past record is the VA will ask for extensions but will come in under the wire before the Judge makes a ruling preserving their claim or boast that they have not lost a Writ.

There are several Hadit Members who were somewhat successful with a Writ of Mandamus.

One piece of advice is to make a Writ more effective you should write the VA and advise or warn of your intention to file a Writ if a decision is not made in 30 days and possibly even another 15 day notice. This presents a better face to a Judge. Remember that a Writ is a petition to ask a Judge to make the VA do their job.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Thanks Tbird and Pete, your suggestions are appreciated. I probably will wait a while before posting the writ, as Tbird suggested. However, if anyone out there is so, so, frustrated, and thinks a writ may work for them, they may email me and I will try to send it to them personally.ASAP, before I know whether or not it worked.

I did talk to the clerk at the CAVC yesterday. (You file a writ through the Court of Veterans Claims, not the Regional Office) He said that the filing fee for a writ is $50 BUT he says it is waived for pretty much anyone who asks that it be waived. That is, if you think you can afford the $50, pay it, but if you think you cant, ask that it be waived. AS was already mentioned, if you are considering a writ, the VERY First thing you do is order a copy of your Cfile if you dont already have it. (It may take some time, it took over 6 months for me to get my Cfile) You ask for a copy of your Cfile, in writing at your VARO. It may help to cite the freedom of Information act, even tho I did not.

Then, if you are filing the writ yourself (that is, without an attorney), as about 70% of the Writs, you need to do your homework: Research similar cases as yours at the CAVC. Especially important are

Precedent cases. Hadit has great stuff on important cases. Precedent Opinions, issued by the General Counsel, are good too, but make sure that they havent been superseeded..that is, a newer Precedent opinion has been issued that pretty much nullifies superseded precedent opinions. It will say, on the opinion, if it was superseded or not.

Now, on the WHEN to file a writ. IMHO , you should consider a Writ when everything else failed and you can document that your Regional Office (or BVA) violated policies and regulations. Remember, you may have to really LOOK for those Regulations they violated in delaying/denying your claim. If you are considering a CUE claim, or an appeal, file those first, instead of the Writ. And, as was already suggested, write the VARO and send them notice of impending writ, as I did. I will update you with some "juicy" case law that is often helpfull to Veterans. I think a lot of times the Regional Office develops the Veterans claim to a MINIMUM, so they can pay less. They can not do that, according to the following case:

VA is ˜to fully and sympathetically develop the veterans claim to its optimum before

deciding it on its merits."

Roberson, 251 F.3d at 1384 (quoting Hodge v. West, 155 F.3d 1356, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1998))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use