Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
broncovet
B) Is anyone interested in a Writ of Mandamus that I wrote? If I get enough people interested, I am considering posting it even tho I do not know if it is "successful" or not because I just filed it last week. I am not a lawyer, but this is my take on the writ:
It is for "extrordinary measures", not just your plain garden variety claims. I filed a writ, in part, because the VARO in Cleveland took absolutely NO action on my NOD filed in March, 2004. No Statement of Case, no nothing. In the Writ, I am seeking to Compel the VARO to make a decision on an informal claim filed in July, 2002.
The Writ is when nothing else works. If you are unhappy with the Regional Office decision, file a NOD, not a writ. If it has been more than a year since your RO decision, then you need to try to prove CUE, as an appeal on a claim where the decision was more than a year ago will fail, unless you can prove CUE. If you are unhappy with a BVA decision, file an appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims.
In my particular case, I received a very favorable decision from the BVA but the Cleveland RO simply failed to implement it. It makes no sense to appeal a decision favorable to the Veteran. However, when the Regional Office takes it upon themself to attempt to circumvent the law by just "blowing off" the BVA, I feel the writ was justified.
The courts have ruled that the "VA is not free to ignore its own regulations". :P In my writ, I am suggesting it is the Court of Veterans Claims that is the "police" for the VARO to compel them to follow their own laws.
By the way, I have had a difference of opinion with some people on here, which turned into some rather heated posts. If these individuals elect to use these posts as a way to further cut me down, all of you :D will pay, as I simply will not post the writ which may well do a lot of you some good, especially if nothing else has worked with your claim. I am here to try to help other Veterans, and I am not all that interested in defending myself from people who wish to attack me. Yes, I think there are definately some changes to the status quo that need to be made, and I have expressed opinions on some of these changes that have ruffled a few feathers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
1
Popular Days
Nov 8
4
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 2 posts
Tbird 1 post
Pete53 1 post
Popular Days
Nov 8 2007
4 posts
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts