Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Loss Of Use

Rate this question


JayBrown1

Question

Can anyone tell me for VA purposes the definition of Loss of Use? I was told if you had two major joints with extreme ankylosis then the effected foots would be considered Loss of Use, Is this true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Greetings,

I am rated Loss of Use of bi-lateral feet. I use a cane to walk as difficult as it is, however due to my bi-later foot issues I was granted loss of use. Without the braces (given to me by my foot doctor at the VAMC) I have epsiodes of falling.

What made the difference for me was when I was issued braces for support. Please note when I asked for increase for my bi-lateral foot problems I was allready rated at 50% for the feet so the only next step was 100% due to loss of use. I didn't even ask the VARO for that rating. When I received my award letter along with my other issues they gave it to me, along with auto allowence, housing grant (which I have used) it was a real blessing. I hope this helps.

Bound4Heaven

Are you wheelchair bound or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay,

Favorable ankylosis of the knee would mean that it is locked in 0 to 5 degrees of extension. Basically the veteran would have to be walking stiff-legged since they could not bend their knee. Unfavorable ankylosis likely is comparable to loss of use of the foot because the foot would either not be touching the ground or incapable of supporting weight due to being locked in varying degree of flexion contracture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it is quite common for the VA to grant "loss of use" for a foot when the veteran wears an "AFO", in almost ALL cases... or all but one that I have seen the VA also required some proof of nerve damage thru an EMG. The case I didn't see it, but thought it could be won was where the thalamus of the brain was damaged and this would NOT show up on an EMG. I think a decent claim could be made there, but otherwise, while having an "AFO" seems to be almost a necessity for loss of use, a solid EMG showing some abnormality... not great just some is usually required by the rater as well.

How many times have we seen this question now?.... hehe

By the way all the ex-raters I have discussed this with have stated that they did and do require the EMG, and if you claim loss of use, its an almost automatic C&P.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFO = Ankle Foot Orthotic (device)

Basically it is a hardened plastic (really really hard) molded device which holds your foot level, witch allows no movement of the ankle, the AFO goes up the leg to just below the knee (most of them anyway some are a little different, and the used to be made out of metal). Since your foot is secured, people who suffer foot-drop or a reduced plantar or dorsi-felxion have a foot they can trust not to just give out.

I wear 2. One on each leg.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greetings,

I am rated Loss of Use of bi-lateral feet. I use a cane to walk as difficult as it is, however due to my bi-later foot issues I was granted loss of use. Without the braces (given to me by my foot doctor at the VAMC) I have epsiodes of falling.

What made the difference for me was when I was issued braces for support. Please note when I asked for increase for my bi-lateral foot problems I was allready rated at 50% for the feet so the only next step was 100% due to loss of use. I didn't even ask the VARO for that rating. When I received my award letter along with my other issues they gave it to me, along with auto allowence, housing grant (which I have used) it was a real blessing. I hope this helps.

Bound4Heaven

Bound4heaven I noticed that you rated loss of use and use a cane instead of a wheelchair. Do you mine if I ask you are bi-lateral feet problems you have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use