Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Helping Tbi

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I think this could be one of the best things the VA has done yet to help combat veterans.

TBI is often a disability that cannot be seen, not even on some CT scans-yet as brain injury could have lasting affects.

The Pakistan Gov is even suggesting that Bhutto was killed not due to bullets, or even to hitting her head on the sun roof lever but possibly due to the brain trauma of the explosion that followed the gun fire and the shock waves from it.We all remember the nanny who caused brain trauma to a child by shaking it.

If a vet comes back with undiagnosed TBI that might appear as a sudden persinality change- there goes the basis for a PD diagnosis without looking for a physical cause of the change.

This is from email from alamostation:

"Program to use UT scanner to study troops' brain injuries

Department of Veterans Affairs' $4.2 million program to rely on cutting-edge technology.

Click-2-Listen

By Marty Toohey

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Friday, December 28, 2007

The Department of Veterans Affairs is starting a multimillion dollar program at the University of Texas to study brain injuries among U.S. troops.

The program will use UT's new state-of-the-art brain scanner at the J.J. Pickle Research Campus in North Austin. Initially, efforts will focus on the often invisible and debilitating brain injuries sustained by more than 20,000 troops, according to some estimates.

Identifying and treating the wounds is difficult because the injuries can easily be confused with other conditions or missed by even the most powerful scans.

Officials say they hope the $4.2 million program, which got its funding four months ago from the VA, will eventually expand into brain injuries among children and athletes, and possibly even into the physical causes within the brain for psychological conditions such as post traumatic stress disorder.

Dr. Robert Van Boven, the program director, said he envisions a place to test how well new methods of detection and treatment work, "and hopefully be the birthplace for new standards of treatment for victims" of traumatic brain injury.

Brain injury has emerged as the signature wound of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. There, roadside bombs detonate with concussive blasts that can jar the brains of nearby troops. The impact can do damage that varies in severity, and the injuries can create a broad range of symptoms, some of which can take months to manifest.

The injury, like the brain itself, is poorly understood, experts say.

"It's a virtually unexplored area," said Michael Domjan, director of the Imaging Research Center, which UT opened in January 2006 before any talks with the VA had begun. "We've got a powerful research tool we're pleased to see used to address a serious medical problem, one that is not limited to just veterans."

That tool, which cost $2.2 million, is among the most sophisticated brain-imaging devices in the world. Van Boven said the VA program is the first to combine the three types of brain scans the machine can perform.

One type of scan takes snapshots of the brain during various activities, such as a question-and-answer session intended to test memory. The snapshots are used to compare how various areas of the brain are working at different times.

Another type of scan focuses on particular stretches of the microscopic highways that connect various portions of the brain and allow them to communicate. A disruption in those highways can manifest in symptoms such as inability to move a limb or to reason through complex problems.

A third type of scan will analyze the chemicals in a disrupted stretch of that highway to determine what, exactly, is wrong.

The combination of techniques is more precise than most brain scans, Van Boven said, and far more reliable than the standard method of making a diagnosis mostly or entirely on symptoms (which include emotional instability, inability to concentrate and balance problems). The symptoms can easily be confused or intermingled with those of post traumatic stress disorder, depression and sleep disorders, all of which require different treatment.

"In general, we've been overly reliant on subjective and nonspecific resources, such as interviews or psychological evaluations, to make a diagnosis," Van Boven said. "When someone says they're having trouble remembering things, that's not a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. ... The same problem exists for" brain injuries.

That assessment is shared by Dr. Jim Misko, a neuropsychologist in Dripping Springs.

"This is what the field has been waiting for," said Misko, a member of the Brain Injury Association of Texas who specializes in treating the condition. "Rehab professionals are sorely in need of knowing which treatments really are effective and which ones aren't."

Some organizations, such as the National Institutes of Health and National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, have been funding research into brain injuries for years. But experts and veterans' advocates say far more money and effort are needed to deal with the consequences of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Among the first tasks for the VA's new program will be evaluating a series of computer programs created by Dr. Michael Merzenich, one of the world's leading neuroscientists. Merzenich's computer programs give the brain mental calisthenics and are designed to tap into the brain's ability to rewire itself.

As a VA doctor, Van Boven is treating troops with brain injuries, but the program will not begin working with patients until its finer points are approved next year.

After everything is approved, Van Boven said, he will start looking in earnest for patients in Central Texas.

"These guys," Van Boven said, "deserve real-world solutions, and we're hoping to help find those solutions."

mtoohey@statesman.com; 445-3673"

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think that the VA is a tag along on this the UT was going to do it with VA or not.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a two edged sword.

One, the improved imagery will help some vets get a diagnoses. And maybe treatment.

Two, it hasn't been proven that this technology will accuratly find minute brain damage. I think the VA may rely too heavily on on negative findings of damage to deny claims and find other causes like PD's or malingering.

My ct's and mri's show nothing but neuro-psych testing shows significant deficits. Had I had these deficits before my TBI I would have been riding the short bus to school if I was able to go at all.

Though I think it is a good thing for the private sector or even the DOD, I think it's too early for the VA to be involved. But, you never know, I might get surprized. I'm probably a bit leary because I went through the years of misdiagnoses before TBI became popular.

All that said, I'd love to get in that machine and get some answers for myself.

Time

Edited by timetowinarace
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School took the VA head on on Gulf War Syndrome and helped Veterans. Ross Perot helped fund the medical investigation.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use