Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Clinical Practice Guidelines

Rate this question


Guest allanopie

Question

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

As far as getting copies of your C & P exam results ASAP after the exam, I did that for my husband's claim. When I looked at the report, I was floored. As I stated before, I wrote a letter and disputed everything that was in the report and backed it up with the documentation to show the dispute. When I took this to the RO, they wanted to know how I was able to get a copy of the C & P exam prior to a decision by the RO. I told them that we went to Release of Information and requested it. He didn't sound happy about this. He stated that since I had the report already and issued this with my complaints to the RO prior to a decision being made, (using this inadequate report) that it could possibly hold up his claim further. I then told him that all I was trying to do was bring to light an inadequate exam before a final decision and that I felt that by doing so I was saving time by not getting a denial that was pretty evident and then having to submit what I had just given them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

MSS

About a year ago, or a little more, the VA changed their own Manual to require that C&P Reports were NOT released to the Veteran BEFORE they were "finalized" by the RO. As is normal with the VA, the word never got to the VAMC in many cases, and they have still been releasing copies.

I think you will find in future, that the VAMC cannot release them to you, the VARO will, eventually, after they have had a chance to tell the examiner what they want changed in the report.

I had a post on the old board when this first became VA policy, because Manila VARO jumped on it immediately, and put it into effect.

John999

You will find that it is not only personal experience that validates that, it is actually VA policy, since 38 CFR says:

§ 3.655 Failure to report for Department of Veterans Affairs examination.

(a) General. When entitlement or continued entitlement to a benefit cannot be established or confirmed without a current VA examination or reexamination and a claimant, without good cause, fails to report for such examination, or reexamination, action shall be taken in accordance with paragraph (:) or © of this section as appropriate. Examples of good cause include, but are not limited to, the illness or hospitalization of the claimant, death of an immediate family member, etc. For purposes of this section, the terms examination and reexamination include periods of hospital observation when required by VA.

(B) Original or reopened claim, or claim for increase. When a claimant fails to report for an examination scheduled in conjunction with an original compensation claim, the claim shall be rated based on the evidence of record. When the examination was scheduled in conjunction with any other original claim, a reopened claim for a benefit which was previously disallowed, or a claim for increase, the claim shall be denied.

© Running award. (1) When a claimant fails to report for a reexamination and the issue is continuing entitlement, VA shall issue a pretermination notice advising the payee that payment for the disability or disabilities for which the reexamination was scheduled will be discontinued or, if a minimum evaluation is established in part 4 of this title or there is an evaluation protected under § 3.951(B) of this part, reduced to the lower evaluation. Such notice shall also include the prospective date of discontinuance or reduction, the reason therefor and a statement of the claimant's procedural and appellate rights. The claimant shall be allowed 60 days to indicate his or her willingness to report for a reexamination or to present evidence that payment for the disability or disabilities for which the reexamination was scheduled should not be discontinued or reduced.

(2) If there is no response within 60 days, or if the evidence submitted does not establish continued entitlement, payment for such disability or disabilities shall be discontinued or reduced as of the date indicated in the pretermination notice or the date of last payment, whichever is later.

(3) If notice is received that the claimant is willing to report for a reexamination before payment has been discontinued or reduced, action to adjust payment shall be deferred. The reexamination shall be rescheduled and the claimant notified that failure to report for the rescheduled examination shall be cause for immediate discontinuance or reduction of payment. When a claimant fails to report for such rescheduled examination, payment shall be reduced or discontinued as of the date of last payment and shall not be further adjusted until a VA examination has been conducted and the report reviewed.

(4) If within 30 days of a pretermination notice issued under paragraph ©(1) of this section the claimant requests a hearing, action to adjust payment shall be deferred as set forth in § 3.105(h)(1) of this part. If a hearing is requested more than 30 days after such pretermination notice but before the proposed date of discontinuance or reduction, a hearing shall be scheduled, but payment shall nevertheless be discontinued or reduced as of the date proposed in the pretermination notice or date of last payment, whichever is later, unless information is presented which warrants a different determination. When the claimant has also expressed willingness to report for an examination, however, the provisions of paragraph ©(3) of this section shall apply.

Source

[55 FR 49521, Nov. 29, 1990; 58 FR 46865, Sept. 3, 1993]

Notes

(38 U.S.C. 501)

CROSS REFERENCES: Procedural due process and appellate rights. See § 3.103. Examinations. See § 3.326. Reexaminations. See § 3.327. Resumption of rating when veteran subsequently reports for VA examination. See § 3.330.

Fight the VA as if they are the enemy; for they are!

Erin go Bragh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay

In my experience not going to a C&P exam is a sure way to have a claim denied.

Why are you telling me this? I didn't say anything about refusing a C&P exam.......I said one should use a civilian examination in lieu of a C&P exam. I went on to say that "even if they don't accept the civilian examination you will have a better grounds to argue against any pending C&P outcome. "

The regs are quite clear and you can give an IMO in place of a C&P (doesn't mean they MUST accept it though).

Here's the regulation:

3.326 Examinations.

For purposes of this section, the term examination includes periods of hospital observation when required by VA.

(a) Where there is a claim for disability compensation or pension but medical evidence accompanying the claim is not adequate for rating purposes, a Department of Veterans Affairs examination will be authorized. This paragraph applies to original and reopened claims as well as claims for increase submitted by a veteran, surviving spouse, parent, or child. Individuals for whom an examination has been scheduled are required to report for the examination.

(b) Provided that it is otherwise adequate for rating purposes, any hospital report, or any examination report, from any government or private institution may be accepted for rating a claim without further examination. However, monetary benefits to a former prisoner of war will not be denied unless the claimant has been offered a complete physical examination conducted at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital or outpatient clinic.

P.S. - Honestly, what's with everyone beating on me?

Edited by Jay Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Jay

I am not beating on you, buddy. I am just saying that if you try and avoid the C&P exam process you have a good chance of having your claim denied. A friend of mine who had very good documentation told the VA to just go with his civilian medical in lieu of a C&P exam. He was denied. A few month later when he finally went for the C&P exam he got 100%. You just have to figure that if the VA is going to award benefits they want their own doctors to take a look at you. It is mostly the same with SSA.

I know the C&P exam process is pretty horrible. I have had at least ten C&P exams over the years. I jus think you erect a barrier to winning your claim when you decline a C&P exam. This is my opinion and not the last word on the subject. Some here have begged for C&P exams to win their claims and the denial of providing a C&P was the cheif reason for denial of the claim (Terry Higgins).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay

I am not beating on you, buddy. I am just saying that if you try and avoid the C&P exam process you have a good chance of having your claim denied. A friend of mine who had very good documentation told the VA to just go with his civilian medical in lieu of a C&P exam. He was denied. A few month later when he finally went for the C&P exam he got 100%. You just have to figure that if the VA is going to award benefits they want their own doctors to take a look at you. It is mostly the same with SSA.

I know the C&P exam process is pretty horrible. I have had at least ten C&P exams over the years. I jus think you erect a barrier to winning your claim when you decline a C&P exam. This is my opinion and not the last word on the subject. Some here have begged for C&P exams to win their claims and the denial of providing a C&P was the cheif reason for denial of the claim (Terry Higgins).

By no means do I advocate NOT going to a scheduled C&P exam, but I believe, quite strongly, that one should use a civilian treating doctor and "attempt" to use the treating doctor's exam in lieu of a C&P. The reason most civilian reports are not accepted is because you need a doctor who is willing to do a thorough report in the VA's language. *If* the VA will not accept the civilian report then report to your C&P as ordered and use the civilian report for reasonable doubt should the VA choose the C&P over the treating doctor's examination.

Again, I am saying that one should use a civilian doctor rather then a VA one and submit said doctor's thorough evaluation a month or so before a scheduled C&P exam.....if the RO will not accept the report then go to the C&P as scheduled, but fight it all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use