HadIt.com Elder Josephine Posted May 18, 2008 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted May 18, 2008 (edited) Are these two doctors the first being from the C&P October 2004 and the second one April 12, 2005 addressing my being unempoyable? Should they have said more? Thanks, Betty Edited October 1, 2008 by Josephine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_spirit_etc Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 The statement "She has NOT worked since 1983 SECONDARY to her high levels of anxiety and depression" sure sounds like it. The VA was SAYING they got the idea you quit work in 1983 to work at home from your med records. Did they mis-state those? Was wondering if it was a case where you DID try working - but couldn't handle the stress and wanted to be at home (i.e. safer, less stress) - which is totally different that wanting to WORK from home - or "ho hum..I think I will just sit at home..." Free Are these two doctors the first being from the C&P October 2004 and the second one April 12, 2005 addressing my being unempoyable? Should they have said more? Thanks, Betty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_spirit_etc Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 The second one also shows a pattern... multiple jobs - none lasting very long -- and then not working - and you FUNCTION better at home -- Well..YES>> your husband drives your everywhere - and you rarely go out... you function BEST at home - with a supportive family - and less stress... Which is slightly different than wanting to WORK from the home. Free Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_spirit_etc Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/04-7020.pdf The 1989 version of 38 C.F.R. § 4.16© read: n cases in which the only compensable service-connected disability is a mental disorder assigned a 70 percent evaluation, and such mental disorder precludes a veteran from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation . . . the mental disorder shall be assigned a 100 percent schedular evaluation. I wonder when they updated THAT one! CURRENT ONE § 4.16 Total disability ratings for compensation based on unemployability of the individual. (a) Total disability ratings for compensation may be assigned, where the schedular rating is less than total, when the disabled person is, in the judgment of the rating agency, unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of service-connected disabilities: Provided That, if there is only one such disability, this disability shall be ratable at 60 percent or more, and that, if there are two or more disabilities, there shall be at least one disability ratable at 40 percent or more, and sufficient additional disability to bring the combined rating to 70 percent or more. For the above purpose of one 60 percent disability, or one 40 percent disability in combination, the following will be considered as one disability: (1) Disabilities of one or both upper extremities, or of one or both lower extremities, including the bilateral factor, if applicable, (2) disabilities resulting from common etiology or a single accident, (3) disabilities affecting a single body system, e.g. orthopedic, digestive, respiratory, cardiovascular-renal, neuropsychiatric, (4) multiple injuries incurred in action, or (5) multiple disabilities incurred as a prisoner of war. It is provided further that the existence or degree of nonservice-connected disabilities or previous unemployability status will be disregarded where the percentages referred to in this paragraph for the service-connected disability or disabilities are met and in the judgment of the rating agency such service-connected disabilities render the veteran unemployable. Marginal employment shall not be considered substantially gainful employment. For purposes of this section, marginal employment generally shall be deemed to exist when a veteran's earned annual income does not exceed the amount established by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, as the poverty threshold for one person. Marginal employment may also be held to exist, on a facts found basis (includes but is not limited to employment in a protected environment such as a family business or sheltered workshop), when earned annual income exceeds the poverty threshold. Consideration shall be given in all claims to the nature of the employment and the reason for termination. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501) ( It is the established policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs that all veterans who are unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation by reason of service-connected disabilities shall be rated totally disabled. Therefore, rating boards should submit to the Director, Compensation and Pension Service, for extra-schedular consideration all cases of veterans who are unemployable by reason of service-connected disabilities, but who fail to meet the percentage standards set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. The rating board will include a full statement as to the veteran's service-connected disabilities, employment history, educational and vocational attainment and all other factors having a bearing on the issue. I think you have a case for the fact that you have ALWAYS been "unemployable - as you have NEVER had substantial gainful employment - you have ONLY had marginal employmment! And from 1983 you have been unable to even maintain the MARGINAL employment. Free Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_spirit_etc Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders: 100% - Total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as: gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name 70% - Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood, due to such symptoms as: suicidal ideation; obsessional rituals which interfere with routine activities; speech intermittently illogical, obscure, or irrelevant; near-continuous panic or depression affecting the ability to function independently, appropriately and effectively; impaired impulse control (such as unprovoked irritability with periods of violence); spatial disorientation; neglect of personal appearance and hygiene; difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances (including work or a worklike setting); inability to establish and maintain effective relationships 50% - Occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as: flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short- and long-term memory (e.g., retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships 30% -Occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks (although generally functioning satisfactorily, with routine behavior, self-care, and conversation normal), due to such symptoms as: depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, panic attacks (weekly or less often), chronic sleep impairment, mild memory loss (such as forgetting names, directions, recent events) 10% - Occupational and social impairment due to mild or transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency and ability to perform occupational tasks only during periods of significant stress, or; symptoms controlled by continuous medication 10 0% - A mental condition has been formally diagnosed, but symptoms are not severe enough either to interfere with occupational and social functioning or to require continuous medication Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder Philip Rogers Posted May 19, 2008 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted May 19, 2008 That was changed on 10/8/96. pr http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/04-7020.pdf The 1989 version of 38 C.F.R. § 4.16© read: n cases in which the only compensable service-connected disability is a mental disorder assigned a 70 percent evaluation, and such mental disorder precludes a veteran from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation . . . the mental disorder shall be assigned a 100 percent schedular evaluation. I wonder when they updated THAT one! CURRENT ONE § 4.16 Total disability ratings for compensation based on unemployability of the individual. (a) Total disability ratings for compensation may be assigned, where the schedular rating is less than total, when the disabled person is, in the judgment of the rating agency, unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of service-connected disabilities: Provided That, if there is only one such disability, this disability shall be ratable at 60 percent or more, and that, if there are two or more disabilities, there shall be at least one disability ratable at 40 percent or more, and sufficient additional disability to bring the combined rating to 70 percent or more. For the above purpose of one 60 percent disability, or one 40 percent disability in combination, the following will be considered as one disability: (1) Disabilities of one or both upper extremities, or of one or both lower extremities, including the bilateral factor, if applicable, (2) disabilities resulting from common etiology or a single accident, (3) disabilities affecting a single body system, e.g. orthopedic, digestive, respiratory, cardiovascular-renal, neuropsychiatric, (4) multiple injuries incurred in action, or (5) multiple disabilities incurred as a prisoner of war. It is provided further that the existence or degree of nonservice-connected disabilities or previous unemployability status will be disregarded where the percentages referred to in this paragraph for the service-connected disability or disabilities are met and in the judgment of the rating agency such service-connected disabilities render the veteran unemployable. Marginal employment shall not be considered substantially gainful employment. For purposes of this section, marginal employment generally shall be deemed to exist when a veteran's earned annual income does not exceed the amount established by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, as the poverty threshold for one person. Marginal employment may also be held to exist, on a facts found basis (includes but is not limited to employment in a protected environment such as a family business or sheltered workshop), when earned annual income exceeds the poverty threshold. Consideration shall be given in all claims to the nature of the employment and the reason for termination. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501) ( It is the established policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs that all veterans who are unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation by reason of service-connected disabilities shall be rated totally disabled. Therefore, rating boards should submit to the Director, Compensation and Pension Service, for extra-schedular consideration all cases of veterans who are unemployable by reason of service-connected disabilities, but who fail to meet the percentage standards set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. The rating board will include a full statement as to the veteran's service-connected disabilities, employment history, educational and vocational attainment and all other factors having a bearing on the issue. I think you have a case for the fact that you have ALWAYS been "unemployable - as you have NEVER had substantial gainful employment - you have ONLY had marginal employmment! And from 1983 you have been unable to even maintain the MARGINAL employment. Free Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder Josephine Posted May 19, 2008 Author HadIt.com Elder Share Posted May 19, 2008 That was changed on 10/8/96. Phillip, I would appreciate if you would post the change. Thanks, Betty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Josephine
Are these two doctors the first being from the C&P October 2004 and the second one April 12, 2005 addressing my being unempoyable?
Should they have said more?
Thanks,
Betty
Edited by JosephineLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
5
2
2
Popular Days
May 19
8
May 20
3
May 23
3
May 18
1
Top Posters For This Question
Josephine 6 posts
free_spirit_etc 5 posts
Hoppy 2 posts
Philip Rogers 2 posts
Popular Days
May 19 2008
8 posts
May 20 2008
3 posts
May 23 2008
3 posts
May 18 2008
1 post
15 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now