Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Failed To File Nod

Rate this question


John Purser

Question

The last straw for me with the VFW was when my SO failed to file a NOD within the claim time. Now, a year later I'm filing for recognition of increased disability (the disability arrived 3 years ago!) again. If I win this round is there a path for me to go back and say "I told you this was so in 2006!" and get back disability or is this just gone for good?

Thanks.

John Purser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

if you have no documentation in the interim 3 years to show an appeal or asking someone at the VARO why you haven't heard anything or some effort on your part to follow it up, probably not. I have date stamped documents going back to Nov 2002 showing letters, e mails, filed NODS, letter to Congressman and Senators, the White House and everyone else, so even the DRO told my attorney that my claim is valid back to Nov 2002 on my heart disease even though the RO tried telling me I had not properly appealed it thru the AL or DAV and they had "closed my file" in May 2006 when they awarded my 100% P&T for PTSD despite the fact the very next day I filed a NOD on the fact they had not addressed my heart issues which was filed in Nov 2002 without a paper trail to show you were actively pursuing the claim it is more than likely going to be denied an earlier effective date

The DRO confirmed to my lawyer in August when they denied me again that my claim was active since 2002 and if the BVA awards the claim in Feb 2009 when we finally have the BVA appeal hearing the effective date will go back to 2002 with the very first dated letter I have to the VA, even though we are now claiming my heart problems as secondary to my SC PTSD which was approved in May 2006 with an effective date in Dec 2003

my original SO told my wife and I that we could only file one medical issue at a time and we had to wait for the VA to adjudicate it before we could file for other medical problems, like my most veterans I didn't know any better and we were told that the AL rep was the best in the state. Thru Hadit I learned he was full of it and was lying to my wife and I. Skip and Tom and others told us the right way to do it and in Dec 2003 I revoked his POA and filed the other issues on our own

without a paper trail it will be hard to prove you had an active claim but that is just my 2 cents maybe someone else has other ideas

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I was pretty sure I was well and truly screwed when I figured out what happened. My SO told me that immediately disagreeing would "weaken my case" so I should wait a couple of months before filing the NOD. When I came back for my scheduled appointment she was at a seminar so I was told to come back in a week. I did but then she was on vacation for 2 weeks. When I finally saw her she just stared at me. She'd forgotten all about it. Perfect. She never did tell me I'd lost my claim rights. I had to figure it out.

No paper trail. Just a sorry record of me passively taking directions. So I know better now. I hope others are reading and paying attention.

if you have no documentation in the interim 3 years to show an appeal or asking someone at the VARO why you haven't heard anything or some effort on your part to follow it up, probably not. ...it is more than likely going to be denied an earlier effective date

my original SO told my wife and I that we could only file one medical issue at a time and we had to wait for the VA to adjudicate it before we could file for other medical problems, like my most veterans I didn't know any better and we were told that the AL rep was the best in the state. Thru Hadit I learned he was full of it and was lying to my wife and I. Skip and Tom and others told us the right way to do it and in Dec 2003 I revoked his POA and filed the other issues on our own

without a paper trail it will be hard to prove you had an active claim but that is just my 2 cents maybe someone else has other ideas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a former VSO for the VFW I can assure you that exactly because of your type of situation I no longer work with the VFW or any other organization. It is always and I think it will always be the organization FIRST and the VET SECOND. I had a lot of conflicts because I put the vet first and foremost and did not wish to promote the VFW. I just help vets from the outside and am happy doing it. Good luck .(VSO for about eight years and did DRO hrgs, appeals etc.) Really hurt when I could not continue in my position. Q

bobbyq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a former VSO for the VFW I can assure you that exactly because of your type of situation I no longer work with the VFW or any other organization. It is always and I think it will always be the organization FIRST and the VET SECOND. I had a lot of conflicts because I put the vet first and foremost and did not wish to promote the VFW. I just help vets from the outside and am happy doing it. Good luck .(VSO for about eight years and did DRO hrgs, appeals etc.) Really hurt when I could not continue in my position. Q

Hey Q:

Great to have someone of your expertise on this site. Thanks for your help. It's disheartening that the VSO's aren't what they should be, but it is blatantly obvious now. I got a guy who was a rating officer for the VA helping me. He started to charge people now, but I think he is better than a lawyer, because he knows the system inside and out.

s/Mags

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use