Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Cue - New C & P Exam Scheduled

Rate this question


Angela

Question

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Lets look at Cue from a different standpoint. An employee of the VA who makes a CUE and it is a Definate CUE most likely gets reviewed on an annual basis. The Job performance evauluation probally states something like this: No more than 1 or 2 claims errors per rating period.

So the Employee is going to use every avenue available to get a Cue rejected because it makes them look bad to their superiors.

I believe CUE claims are examined with increased detail. I also believe the personal aspect when a worker makes a mistake and takes it personal. Rather than trying to admit the mistake, They spend allot of time doing the old CYA routine and look for ways to deny cues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are considering my CUE on lack of heart rating claim as:

"we will handle this issue as an attempt to reopen this claim as a CUE for service connected death."

I just got this in a VARO letter yesterday and it seems to reflect the prior post-re Roberson-

to handle as a re-open-

yet my direct SC death claim is a cmpletely separate and well supported issue-

I dont see how they have been doing so much movement on my SMC CUE for about 9 days- yet are not considering this CUE heart claim as contingent to that?

They could award SMC without this decision on the other claim though.

Or it is a big stall tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Namvet6567

jstacy - sorry but I disagree to your statement: "Lets look at Cue from a different standpoint. An employee of the VA who makes a CUE and it is a Definate CUE most likely gets reviewed on an annual basis. The Job performance evauluation probally states something like this: No more than 1 or 2 claims errors per rating period."

A far as I know, VA employees are evaluated "on quantity of work, not quality," and I believe it is next to impossible to fire a VA employee. I personally believe their instructions are developed by attorneys whose sole purpose it is to deny claims, using vague but "legal" instructions. JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The performance exaluation may say something like this: Adjudicate a certain quantity of claims with no more than 2 or 3 errors per rating period.

It is not impossible to fire a VA employee. It happens every day. At the VA where my wife works They have terminated 3 or 4 last year and that is just one department.

I am sorry you disagree Namvet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got off the phone with VA customer service rep and just as I thought, they've identified my claim as a "Claim for Increase". CustSvc says there's nothing I can do to correct it except note on their form (the one asking if I'm going to submit new evidence or not) that I don't have any new evidence and that it should be a CUE claim instead of a Claim for Increase.

Your thoughts...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would call back Monday for a second opinion Angela- and I think some of those vet reps just make stuff up-

another thing- the VA PC screen often does not identify a CUE as different for any other claim.

They call my CUE an accrued benefit claim-but it is in fact a CUE claim ,which they recently acknowledged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use