Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Qestion For Vets Of All Era's

Rate this question


timetowinarace

Question

I was reminded from a post in another thread that Gulf War Veterans are not allowed to donate blood. I remember being told by the Army when we came back from the desert that we could not donate but was/am unsure if this ban was still active. I have not officially verified that it is still active.

The question is, Are veterans from other conflicts banned from donating blood, especially this curent conflict?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Subject = EXPLANATION OF BLOOD DONATION RESTRICTION FOR SWA VETERANS

Parent Organization = MISC

Unit = MISC

Folder Title = 123D US ARMY RESERVE COMMAND-SWA VETERANS BLOOD DONATION RESTRICTIONS EXPLANATION

Document Number = 1

Box ID = BX005619

CORRECTED COPY

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

HEADQUARTERS 123D UNITED STATES ARMY RESERVE COMMAND

BUILDING 126

FORT BENJAMIN HARRISON. INDIANA 46216-6400

IN REPLY

REFER TO

AFRC-AIN-MED (40-2b) 27 November 1991

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL 123d ANCOM MAJOR SU13ORDINATE COMMANDS AND

DIRECT REPORTING UNITS

SUBJECT: Explanation of Blood Donation Restrictions for

Southwest Asia (SWA) Veterans

1. The enclosed information will provide an explanation for the

Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) restriction on SWA

veterans donating blood or blood products.

2. According to MSG NBR-0814-02F4CB, page 5, para 11, received

17 November 1991, 'until further notice all personnel from Saudi

Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq. Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Oman

and Yeman from I Aug 1990' are asked to deter blood donations

until further notice.

3. The reason for this restriction is potential exposure of

deployed service members to the disease VISCEROTROPIC

LEISIIMANIASIS. Seven cases have been diagnosed to date at

Walter Reed Medical Center. All were free of skin lesions

(normal symptom), but had parasites recovered from their bone

marrow.

4. Leishmaniasis is one of a number of infectious diseases

transmitted via sand fly bites. Several ARCOM soldiers returned

from SWA with possible skin lesions related to sand fly bites.

5. Please ensure all soldiers are informed of this information.

FOR THE COMMANDER:

Encl CARL E. LINES

Military Personnel Officer

http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/declassdocs/ar...cls42_0001.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here's another............

Military Won't Accept Gulf Veterans' Blood

Published: November 13, 1991

The military has stopped accepting blood donations from as many as a half-million Persian Gulf war veterans because of a rare parasite brought home from the region by a small number of troops, the Pentagon said today.

"We have temporarily stopped accepting donations from those who were in the area," said Brig. Gen. Ronald Blanck of the Army.

Military officials said that the parasite Leishmania tropica was not normally life-threatening but that a severe strain could cause anemia and other problems.

The officials said that the risk of contamination by blood transfusions was apparently low, but that they were taking the step as a safety measure until some type of screening procedure could be developed.

The American Association of Blood Banks, which includes more than 2,000 private, hospital and Red Cross donation centers in the country, also recommended today against accepting donations from soldiers and civilians who were in the gulf region during the war.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...752C1A967958260

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder

here's a google search with more about this http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=...amp;btnG=Search

Here's another............

Military Won't Accept Gulf Veterans' Blood

Published: November 13, 1991

The military has stopped accepting blood donations from as many as a half-million Persian Gulf war veterans because of a rare parasite brought home from the region by a small number of troops, the Pentagon said today.

"We have temporarily stopped accepting donations from those who were in the area," said Brig. Gen. Ronald Blanck of the Army.

Military officials said that the parasite Leishmania tropica was not normally life-threatening but that a severe strain could cause anemia and other problems.

The officials said that the risk of contamination by blood transfusions was apparently low, but that they were taking the step as a safety measure until some type of screening procedure could be developed.

The American Association of Blood Banks, which includes more than 2,000 private, hospital and Red Cross donation centers in the country, also recommended today against accepting donations from soldiers and civilians who were in the gulf region during the war.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...752C1A967958260

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I am a Vietnam Era Vet. I recently gave blood. However, Vietnam Vets are at High risk for Hepatitis C

because of the military using the "guns" to vaccinate.

WE would get in a line, and a corpsman would come by and "shoot" the vaccine in our arm, and he would move right on to the next guy..no cleaning, no alcohol, no nothing.

Often a drop of blood remained in the gun from the previous guy, if you are next..poof, you are blood brothers and have the same diseases.

The military, of course, "banned" this type of gun after they found out it spread blood borne diseases, and then denied that the gun caused Veterans any problems.

Hep C is a bad disease, that can eventually destroy a Veterans liver, killing him. However, it often takes 30 years to manifest itself in liver disease, so the VA works hard on blaming the Veteran and then deny SC for hepatitis. Personally, I recommend Vietnam Vets get tested for Hep C, and seek treatment before your liver is ate up. For more info on Veterans with Hep C, see this site:

http://hcvets.com/AskNOD/index.html

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just vietnam-era vets that the injector guns were used on. I enlisted in 1985 and had the gun used on me. One gun in each arm...I remember that very well.

I guess the only person "safe" was the first person in line....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use