Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Gaf Directive

Rate this question


Guest VetWife Advocate

Question

Guest VetWife Advocate

VHA GAF Directive

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also, see the attached briefing.

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA Directive 97-059

Veterans Health Administration

Washington, DC 20420 November 25, 1997

INSTITUTING GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF FUNCTION (GAF)

SCORES IN AXIS V FOR MENTAL HEALTH PATIENTS

1. PURPOSE: This Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Directive describes new policy and procedures for determining and capturing the Axis V, Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale for all mental health patients.

2. BACKGROUND

a. As part of the Government Performance Results Act (GPRA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been given two performance goals with regard to seriously mentally ill (SMI) veterans:

Goal 1. VHA is to evaluate every mental health patient using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale at least once, define those who are seriously mentally ill, and calculate the GAF index for the SMI population in FY 1998. The GAF is taken directly from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), p. 32, except that VHA only includes scores from 1 to 100, excluding 0 (insufficient information).

Goal 2. VHA will raise the average GAF index over the Fiscal Year (FY) 1998 baseline for the SMI pool of enrollees by five percent between FY 1999 and FY 2003.

b. Public Law 104-262, the Veterans Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, requires that VA will maintain its capacity to provide for the specialized treatment and rehabilitative needs of disabled veterans (including veterans with spinal cord dysfunction, blindness, amputations, and mental illness) within distinct programs or facilities of the Department. In order to define the population of disabled mentally ill veterans so as to preserve VA’s capacity to treat them, VHA is committed to using the GAF, as described in the GPRA Goal 1, in paragraph 2.a.

c. For many years, the American Psychiatric Association’s multi-Axis diagnostic system described in DSM-IV, and its earlier editions, have been recommended as a preferred system for VA Mental Health Programs. DSM-IV and its earlier editions are compatible with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition (ICD-9-CM) used for all other VHA diagnoses.

d. In this system, Axis I includes the clinical [mental] disorders including other [mental] conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention; Axis II records personality disorders; Axis III includes all general medical conditions; Axis IV addresses psychosocial and environmental problems; and Axis V is the Global Assessment of Functioning. While VHA has encouraged use of all five Axes, we currently have no way or special reason for capturing Axis IV for analysis. As we move toward a primary care mental health approach, the medical (Axis III) diagnoses increase in importance.

e. Since 1991, VHA mental health clinicians at many facilities have been routinely recording Axis V GAF scores on all inpatient discharges from psychiatric specialty bed sections as part of the discharge summary. A clerk from Medical Administration Service later codes the diagnoses and enters the GAF scores into the facility’s Patient Treatment File. VA Domiciliaries and Nursing Homes are excluded, even though psychiatric patients are discharged from these and other non-psychiatric bed sections.

f. In FY 1997, new AICS (Automated Information Collection System) software, for the first time permitted the recording of outpatient diagnoses captured from patient encounter forms prepared by clinicians at each visit.

g. The Mental Health Package (MHP), which can be used to record and store GAF scores, is installed at all facilities which have any patients receiving mental health care. NOTE: Some staff at most facilities use the Mental Health Package and are familiar with it.

3. POLICY

a. It is VHA policy that, starting in FY 1998, as part of the diagnosis, mental health clinicians are required to record at least one GAF score in Axis V reflecting the "current level of functioning" for each veteran patient seen at any VHA mental health inpatient or outpatient setting.

(1). Outpatients seen in a mental health clinic or program who have not had a GAF score for 90 days will require an update. "Mental health clinics or programs" are defined as those for which a 500 series stop code, now also called Decision Support System (DSS) Identifier, is generated (with the exception of the telephone stop codes numbers 526, 527, 528, 542, 545, and 546).

(2). At least one GAF score in Axis V will now be required for all patients discharged from psychiatric bed sections. A zero score indicating "insufficient information" will no longer be permitted.

(3). GAF scores for all patients included in the Annual Patient Census will be required before September 30, 1998.

b. Responsibility

(1). The Chief Information Officer. The Chief Information Officer will oversee development of software described in this Directive in a timely manner.

(2). VISN Directors. VISN Directors are to ensure that medical facilities within their area of responsibility initiate the policy found in this Directive immediately.

(3). Mental Health Strategic Healthcare Group. The Mental Health Strategic Healthcare Group (116) will be responsible for retrieving GAF information, analyzing the information and creating national, VISN, and facility-level reports as needed.

4. ACTION:

a. Starting Oct. 1, 1997, each veteran patient seen at any VHA mental health inpatient or outpatient setting will be assessed using the GAF score in Axis V. All GAF scores will be stored at each facility within the Mental Health Package (MHP) of the Veterans Health Information System and Technology Architecture (VISTA) (formerly the Decentralized Hospital Computer Program (DHCP)).

b. The Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) will expedite preparation of outpatient encounter forms that include GAF scores at each facility, and insure that mechanisms exist to transfer such scores from the encounter forms into the appropriate VISTA software package. Until such time as facilities have the new encounter form scanning technology, this, like coding the diagnosis and any other information from the encounter form, will have to be performed manually.

c. The OCIO will develop software for each facility during early in FY 1998 that will automatically take GAF scores from the (inpatient) Patient Treatment File and enter them into the appropriate VISTA software package.

d. As soon as feasible this Fiscal Year, the OCIO will develop additional software for the Patient Care Encounter (PCE) and Scheduling software that will integrate the GAF into current coding of outpatient information and automatically transfer such data into the appropriate VISTA software package.

e. This Fiscal Year, the OCIO will modify the Automated Information Collection System (AICS) to scan the outpatient encounter forms and enter that data into appropriate files, including transferring the GAF into the appropriate VISTA software package.

f. This Fiscal Year, the OCIO will determine which Austin file will contain the roll-up of all GAF scores and provide software that will transfer GAF scores from VISTA files to Austin (VHA’s national database).

5. REFERENCES

a. Public Law 104-262, the Veterans Eligibility Reform Act of 1996.

b. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 1996.

6. FOLLOW-UP RESPONSIBILILTY: The Mental Health Strategic Healthcare Group (116) is responsibility for the content of this Directive.

7. RESCISSIONS: This Directive will expire on November 25, 2002.

(signed)

Kenneth W. Kizer, M.D., M.P.H.

Under Secretary for Health

DISTRIBUTION: CO: E-mailed 11/26/97

FLD: VISN, MA, DO, OC, OCRO and 200 - FAX 11/26/97

EX: Boxes 104, 88, 63, 60, 54, 52, 47 and 44 - FAX 11/26/97

Back to top

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BRIEFING*

PURPOSE: This Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Directive describes new policy and procedures for determining and capturing the Axis V, Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale for all mental health patients as required by law.

BACKGROUND:

1. As part of the Government Performance Results Act (GPRA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been given a goal to evaluate every mental health patient using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale at least once, define those who are seriously mentally ill, and calculate the GAF index for the SMI population in FY 1998 [and thereafter]. In addition, the Veterans Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, requires that VA will maintain its capacity to provide for the specialized treatment and rehabilitative needs of disabled mentally ill veterans, as defined by the GPRA criteria.

2. VHA has had no mechanism to perform, record, or retrieve the GAF scores in our outpatient settings. The Mental Health Strategic Healthcare Group has been working with mental health field staff and with the Office of the Chief Information Officer since last January to prepare the necessary software and advise our respective staffs how to respond. We have had numerous discussions on FORUM and on MHSHG’s monthly conference calls about best ways to meet the October 1 starting time and still prepare needed software. A compromise was reached among our need for sufficient data, the time generally required for a significant change in GAF scores to occur, and the added workload imposed on clinicians (generally less than a minute per patient). The resulting policy states that outpatients reporting for treatment who have not had a GAF score for 90 days, will require an update. Patients shall clearly not be called in just for a GAF rating.

3. GAF scores have been required on all discharges from psychiatric bed sections since October, 1991. Compliance was mandated by software that would not permit a record to be signed out without a GAF score. However, noncompliance in spirit has been achieved by permitting a "0" score, indicating "insufficient information," which was used in the great majority of records. Since there are now consequences for non-compliance under GPRA and PL104-262, we are omitting the "0" score.

IMPLICATIONS: VHA will be in compliance with both GPRA and Public Law 104-262 if we initiate this Directive immediately. VISN and Medical Center Directors will need as much time as possible to initiate necessary procedures.

___________

* Modified in response to concerns by the Chief Network Officer.

Back to top

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use