Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Applying For 100 % Based On Upcoming Surgery

Rate this question


betrayed

Question

I have heard u can, but have seen nothing in CFR38 in regards to it. I am thinking very serious about having the neck surgery done................

Betrayed

540% SC Schedular P&T

LOWER YOUR EXPECTATIONS AND THE VA WILL MEET THEM !!!

WEBMASTER BETRAYEDVETERAN.COM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You hit the street, you feel them staring you know they hate you you can feel their eyes a glarin'

Because you're different, because you're free, because you're everything deep down they wish they could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

My husband has a claim in for a service-connected hernia repair surgery that took place on 5/14/04. He was in the hospital overnight, and was discharged the next day. He convalesced and returned to work on 6-15-04.

Does it sound like this qualifies, I'm thinking it may not.

Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry to be a pest, but just asking this question again, has anyone been through this?

We filed for this benefit in 2004, maybe we weren't entitled to it. I'm asking so I know whether to press it or not.

Thanks all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Berta

http://www.va.gov/vetapp05/files3/0520913.txt

This case shows the convalescence criteria.

It seems that your claim is like this part : under (1)

"Entitlement to a temporary total convalescence rating is

warranted if treatment of a service-connected disability

results in: (1) surgery necessitating at least one month of

post-operative convalescence; (2) surgery with severe post-

operative residuals such as incomplete healed surgical

wounds, therapeutic immobilization of one major joint or

more, application of a body cast, the necessity for house

confinement, or the necessity for continued use of a

wheelchair or crutches (regular weight- bearing prohibited);

or (3) immobilization by cast, without surgery, of one major

joint or more. " Id.

Have you heard anything at all since filing this claim in 2004?

With medical evidence that states that he needed the month off work due to this

surgery for SC condition-I sure think this qualifies him for the Temp 100% for that month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, to date we haven't heard anything directly from the VARO.

In September 2004, my husband called the VARO because we hadn't heard anything on the claim. First they said they never received the claim and that we'd have to start all over. The next day, after we located the certified mail receipt, my husband called back and got another lady on the phone, who told him that the VARO received the claim, and that it had been denied. We told her we never received a Rating Decision or an SOC. She asked us to give her a chance to see what was going on with the claim, and to call her back. When we called her back later, she said that the C-file was in Washington awaiting a Board hearing (which took place in October 2005), and that the VARO had forwarded the claim to include it for Board review. She told us she didn't know where the information came from about the claim not being received or being denied, but she added that we had no grounds for this claim because my husband had to be convalescing for at least 90 days to justify a claim for 100% for that period.

The Board, in turn, remanded the matter back to the VARO saying that the VARO was to send us an authorization to obtain the medical files regarding this surgery (which we had already sent to them). The Board noted that the 2003 C & P exam didn't reveal evidence of an incisional hernia. However, I had already sent the VARO a copy of a C & P exam from 1998 in which the examiner stated there was evidence of a developing incisional hernia. Plus, my husband has a private doctor, he doesn't go to the VA for his healthcare, just his meds. Evidently, the VARO hadn't sent the Board the medical information I had forwarded to the VARO, just the claim we had sent shortly before the surgery.

So here we are today, with the C-file still in Washington awaiting a Court hearing. The VA's General Counsel is to make the Designation of Record no later than March 20, 2006. It's my understanding that once that happens, the file then goes back to the VARO (?) and maybe then, we'll receive our avalanche of Rating Decisions and/or SOC's.

One of which is this claim for 100% disability during my husband's 31 day convalescence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use