Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

U. S. Court Of Appeals

Rate this question


Guest allanopie

Question

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Guest allanopie

Hello Terry,

I spent many yrs wishing someone with DR. Bash's expertise, would actually read my records & provide a clear medical diagnoses & opinion.

Vets can save themselves yrs of waiting, from a thorough evaluation of their medical records. That was something that really impressed me about Dr Bash. There is very few in this country like him. My claim is still pending, but I'm confident his opinion will stand & the BVA will eventually reach a decision.

A letter from the BVA recently stated they were requesting another IMO. A resent letter from my SO said the claim was being remanded. Neither said where, why, what for, or what issue. This is the first action on it since Dr Bash's opinion was submitted to the BVA in DC, last Sept 05.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Berta

Allan-I sure agree wtith what you said about Dr. Bash-

His IMO that I sent to the VARO in Nov 2004- quess they are afraid of it-

I have had two DRO reviews so far that fail to even mention or consider it.It also refers to a separate brief IMO I got in 2004 from a former treating VA doctor (they fail to acknowledge that one too)

It was far above and beyond the lousy VA doctor's opinion based on a few chem reports-

Dr. Bash looked at 6 years of VA records, MRI results, autopsy, and even prior SOCs I got on my older claims of 1997.

I now copy his IMO onto the back of every submission or letter I send them.

My vet rep thought his opinion would award me back in 2005 but they failed to consider it.

Until I contacted the IG-in January -I think they did read it- a lot happened on the claim but I cant squeeze out anything from 800# people.

BVA wants an additional IMO on your claim? From Dr. Bash as a clarification? Or are they on a 'fishing expedition'? It will be interesting to see what they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest allanopie

Hello Berta,

>BVA wants an additional IMO on your claim? From Dr. Bash as a clarification? Or are they on a 'fishing expedition'?

The BVA letter didn't say who they were requesting the IMO from. I can only hope it was Dr Bash at this point. If it was someone in maintenance who took a couple classes on IMO's, there could be a problem or two with a, "fair" evaluation,"lol".

'fishing expedition'? I sure hope not. But I know the RO's are into the sport. I've forgotten why, but I hope the BVA will be different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use