Jump to content
  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Berta

Ischemic Ao Vets

Question

Bingo:

we might need this case. The BVA is not opining here as solely specific to the veteran. They have made a statement of medical fact.

“The next question under 38 C.F.R. § 3.309© is whether or not the appellant has ischemic heart disease. While the appellant has had a long history of problems with hypertension and hypertensive cardiovascular disease, more recent evidence shows that he also has coronary artery disease and arteriosclerotic heart disease. As noted above, coronary artery disease and arteriosclerotic heart disease are synonymous with ischemic heart disease. In other words, for VA purposes, there is current medical evidence showing that the appellant has a diagnosis of ischemic heart disease.” “Given the fulfillment of the two primary criteria (the presence of in-service edema and a post-service diagnosis of ischemic heart disease) in this case, the facts are sufficient to support a grant of service connection for ischemic heart disease as being the result of the appellant's POW experience under the presumptive provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.309©. ORDER Service connection for ischemic heart disease is granted. “ from: http://www4.va.gov/vetapp00/files2/0017299.txt THIS statement IS EXACTLY WHAT I PREDICT WE ARE UP AGAINST: “The RO denied the appellant's claim primarily on the strength of a negative opinion furnished by a fee basis physician in August 1997. However, the record clearly shows that the physician was not aware that for VA purposes arteriosclerotic heart disease and coronary artery disease are considered to be ischemic heart disease. See VBA Circular 21-97-1. The physician's opinion that there is no relationship between the appellant's ischemic heart disease, diagnosed as arteriosclerotic heart disease and coronary artery disease, and his localized edema as a POW is in opposition to the relationship established by legal presumption. Where, as in this case, there was localized edema during captivity and ischemic heart disease is subsequently identified, presumptive service connection for ischemic heart disease is warranted.”

from same case above and referenced to VBA circular 21-97-1 -which I need to find at the VA web site--------

A C & P doctor didnt know the relationship of the veteran CAD to his IHD evident by the POW's edema, beri beri and other captivity caused disabilities.

This is case of a POW

And shows how incompetent those C & P docs can be.

IHD is the presumptive for POWs and the doc knew it.

I read stuff life this and I just want to SCREAM when I see this stuff because this is either incompetence or deliberate way for VA to save money.Otr both.

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Bingo # 2- AO vets with ISchemia claims might need this-it isd the VBA circular referred to in the BVA decision I just posted.

I wonder if VA will amend or change this.

AO_CArdio_Dec_2009_VBA.doc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

Bingo # 2- AO vets with ISchemia claims might need this-it isd the VBA circular referred to in the BVA decision I just posted.

I wonder if VA will amend or change this.

Great informative post. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bingo:

we might need this case. The BVA is not opining here as solely specific to the veteran. They have made a statement of medical fact.

“The next question under 38 C.F.R. § 3.309© is whether or not the appellant has ischemic heart disease. While the appellant has had a long history of problems with hypertension and hypertensive cardiovascular disease, more recent evidence shows that he also has coronary artery disease and arteriosclerotic heart disease. As noted above, coronary artery disease and arteriosclerotic heart disease are synonymous with ischemic heart disease. In other words, for VA purposes, there is current medical evidence showing that the appellant has a diagnosis of ischemic heart disease.” “Given the fulfillment of the two primary criteria (the presence of in-service edema and a post-service diagnosis of ischemic heart disease) in this case, the facts are sufficient to support a grant of service connection for ischemic heart disease as being the result of the appellant's POW experience under the presumptive provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.309©. ORDER Service connection for ischemic heart disease is granted. “ from: http://www4.va.gov/vetapp00/files2/0017299.txt THIS statement IS EXACTLY WHAT I PREDICT WE ARE UP AGAINST: “The RO denied the appellant's claim primarily on the strength of a negative opinion furnished by a fee basis physician in August 1997. However, the record clearly shows that the physician was not aware that for VA purposes arteriosclerotic heart disease and coronary artery disease are considered to be ischemic heart disease. See VBA Circular 21-97-1. The physician's opinion that there is no relationship between the appellant's ischemic heart disease, diagnosed as arteriosclerotic heart disease and coronary artery disease, and his localized edema as a POW is in opposition to the relationship established by legal presumption. Where, as in this case, there was localized edema during captivity and ischemic heart disease is subsequently identified, presumptive service connection for ischemic heart disease is warranted.”

from same case above and referenced to VBA circular 21-97-1 -which I need to find at the VA web site--------

A C & P doctor didnt know the relationship of the veteran CAD to his IHD evident by the POW's edema, beri beri and other captivity caused disabilities.

This is case of a POW

And shows how incompetent those C & P docs can be.

IHD is the presumptive for POWs and the doc knew it.

I read stuff life this and I just want to SCREAM when I see this stuff because this is either incompetence or deliberate way for VA to save money.Otr both.

This is pretty simple Berta. I look at it this way. You remember those experiments with monkeys and rats. They put these animals in cages with treats in their view and if they push the right button they get the treat. I've found this to be true throughout DVA. Consultants, general counsel, BVA judges, ratings people, adjudicators, VARO heads, it doesn't seem to matter.

The same principle is true at the NIH, NAS,IOM and others. It's about the payoff.

It's willful ignorance at it's worse and it's right up there with the dodge studies. Dodge studies are those that are meant to direct the science away from the truth. This slows the process and eats up those funds that are meant for viable studies or for a false truth,"see the study shows dioxin isn't harmful". "See the study shows radiation isn't harmful". "Our doctor has determined your illness isn't related to service". The only way to get the treat is to come up with the right answer. They're all trained monkey's and rat's and a few others I might add.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • SHOW YOUR SUPPORT: Ad Free Subscriptions to the Forum available
      Ad free subscriptions are available for the forum. Subscriptions give you the forums ad free and help support the forum and site. Monthly $5 Annually $50 https://community.hadit.com/subscriptions/

      Every bit helps - Thank you.

       
      • 0 replies
    • Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask
      Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask. Chris Attig - Veterans Law Blog 

      <br style="color:#000000; text-align:start">How to Hire an Attorney For Your VA Claim or Appeal Free Guidebook available on the Veterans Law Blog

      I got an email the other day from a Veteran.  It had 2 or 3 sentences about his claim, and then closed at the end: “Please call me. So-and-so told me you were the best and I want your help.”

      While I appreciate the compliments, I shudder a little at emails like this.  For 2 reasons.

      First, I get a lot of emails like this.  And while I diligently represent my clients – I often tell them we will pursue their claim until we have no more appeals or until we win – I am most assuredly not the best.

      There are a LOT of damn good VA Disability attorneys out there.  (Most, if not all, of the best are members of the National Organization of Veterans Advocates…read about one of them, here)

      Second, I don’t want Veterans to choose their attorney based on who their friend thought was the best.  I want Veterans to choose the VA Disability attorney who is BEST for their case.

      In some situations, that may be the Attig Law Firm.

      But it may also be be Hill and Ponton, or Chisholm-Kilpatrick, or Bergman Moore.  Or any one of the dozens of other attorneys who have made the representation of Veterans their professional life’s work.

      There are hundreds of attorneys that are out there representing Veterans, and I’m here to tell you that who is best for your friend’s case may not be the best for your case.

      How do you Find the Best VA Disability Attorney for your Claim?

      First, you have to answer the question: do you NEED an attorney?

      Some of you don’t...
      • 1 reply
    • VA Emergency Medical Care
      VA Emergency Medical Care
      • 3 replies
    • Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      • 0 replies
    • Thanks Berta for your help. I did receive my 100% today for my IU claim on 6/20/2018. It only took 64 days to complete and it is p&t. Thanks for your words of wisdom. 
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines