Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Medical Review Assistance To Board Of Veterans Appeals Cases

Rate this question


Guest allanopie

Question

Guest allanopie

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE 2006-019 Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC 20420 April 3, 2006

MEDICAL REVIEW ASSISTANCE TO BOARD OF VETERANS APPEALS CASES

1. PURPOSE: This Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Directive defines the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) process by which VHA provides medical reviews for the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) cases that require expert advisory medical opinions.

2. BACKGROUND: Prior to the Veterans Judicial Review Act in 1988, BVA was permitted to use its own staff physicians in addition to outside resources to provide expert medical opinions in the decision-making of appeal cases. In July 1994, the decision of the United States Court of Veterans Appeals, in Austin v. Brown, constrained the role BVA staff physicians can play in the appellate process.

a. Appeal cases requiring expert medical opinions must now be referred to sources outside of BVA, such as the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, selected medical schools, and VHA, to provide the medical reviews.

b. VHA physicians offer high quality medical reviews due to a greater appreciation of unique veterans’ health problems, shorter turn-around times of reviewed cases, and familiarity with VA policies and procedures. Most cases requiring medical expert opinions are in the areas of: internal medicine, cardiology, psychiatry, orthopedic surgery, neurology, and occasionally rheumatology; ear, nose, and throat (ENT); pulmonary medicine; environmental medicine; and other specialties.

3. POLICY: It is VHA policy that all designated facilities are to assist and collaborate with BVA requests for medical reviews.

4. ACTION

a. Under Secretary for Health. The Under Secretary for Health, or designee, is responsible for providing BVA with a listing of tertiary, affiliated VA medical centers, including current contact information for the Medical Center Director.

b. Medical Center Director. The Medical Center Director of a listed VA medical center is responsible for:

(1) Ensuring that the requested medical advisory opinions are prepared by physicians employed by or under contract to VA medical centers.

(2) Facilitating prompt resolutions of veterans' appeals by ensuring that a completed medical advisory opinion (starting from the date all pertinent medical case review material of a BVA request is received) is provided to BVA within 60 Days.

(3) Ensuring that the claims file is promptly returned to BVA with the completed medical advisory opinion.

c. Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA). BVA is responsible for:

THIS VHA DIRECTIVE EXPIRES APRIL 30, 2011

VHA DIRECTIVE 2006-019 April 3, 2006

(1) Initiating all requests for medical advisory opinions to the Office of the Director of an individual VA medical center from the VHA listing.

(a) Each request must clearly and concisely state the medical question(s) for which a medical advisory opinion is being sought.

(B) Each request must contain operational procedures including where the completed advisory opinions are to be sent and how the opinion and the related veteran's claim folder are to be shipped back to BVA.

© Each request must provide a BVA point of contact for questions concerning the request or process.

(2) Distributing the caseload equitably based on specialty needs, geographical location, and facility size, to all appropriate VA medical centers, thereby placing minimal burden on any individual VA medical center. NOTE: BVA estimates approximately 2,000 cases a year.

(3) Contacting each VA medical center Director, or designee, to update operational guidelines or procedures as necessary.

(4) Providing a quarterly report to the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary for Health and the Office of Patient Care Services on the:

(a) Participation by VA medical centers,

(B) Number and type of cases referred,

© Timeliness of responses, and

(d) Quality of the medical advisory opinions in facilitating the adjudication process.

5. REFERENCE: None.

6. FOLLOW-UP RESPONSIBILITY: The Chief Patient Care Services Officer (11) and the Chairman, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (01), share responsibility for this Directive. Questions may be addressed to 202-273-8474.

7. RESCISSIONS: VHA Directive 2000-049, dated December 13, 2000, is rescinded. This VHA Directive expires April 30, 2011.

Jonathan B. Perlin, MD, PhD, MSHA, FACP Under Secretary for Health

DISTRIBUTION: CO: E-mailed 4/5/06 FLD: VISN, MA, DO, OC, OCRO, and 200 – E-mailed 4/5/06

2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use