Berta Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nffeb10/nf022510-3.htm GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University ! When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we." Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder MikeR Posted February 25, 2010 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted February 25, 2010 Sounds like a witch hunt at the VA. These don't sound like people that process claims...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder Philip Rogers Posted February 25, 2010 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted February 25, 2010 (edited) Nothing surprises me, at the VA. pr Edited February 25, 2010 by Philip Rogers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlie Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 (edited) If you read the whole report with redactions a VA employee even admits to spending some of his time at work viewing porno on his VA computer. OH - WOW, now their going to put a block on his computer - why the hell aren't all VA computers blocked from things like - ummm, non work related web sites ? ? ? carlie http://www4.va.gov/oig/51/FY2010rpts/VAOIG-09-01492-83.pdf "Issue 7: Whether Misused His VA-Issued Computer The Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch state that an employee has a duty to protect and conserve Government property and shall not use such property, or allow its use, for other than authorized purposes. 5 CFR § 2635.704 (a). VA policy requires employees to conduct themselves professionally in the workplace and to refrain from using Government office equipment for activities that are inappropriate in VA Directive 6001. The policy expressly prohibits employees from using VA computer systems for creating, downloading, viewing, storing, copying, or transmitting of sexually explicit or sexually oriented materials. VA Directive 6001, Paragraph 2 © (5). Federal regulations state that employees will furnish information and testify freely and honestly in cases respecting employment and disciplinary matters. Refusal to testify, concealment of material facts, or willfully inaccurate testimony in connection with an investigation or hearing may be grounds for disciplinary action. 38 CFR § 0.735.12. During the course of our investigation, we conducted a forensic examination of a VA- (b)(6)owned computer issued to , and we discovered approximately 2,600 images depicting partial or full adult nudity and/or sexual activity. The images were located on the computer under his user profile, and a Site Frequency and Internet History Report revealed that used the computer to visit multiple internet websites that promoted and/or displayed images of nudity or sexual activity. A query of the Active Directory reflected that the VA network user ID assigned to was used. (OIG Forensic Laboratory Report, p. 3, dated 9/23/2009.) told us that he read and signed, each year, the National Rules of Behavior for VA computer systems, which informs employees of improper computer use. Initially, expressly denied that he used his VA-issued computer to view pornography. After we informed of our forensic examination results, said that he did not recall going to pornographic websites, and he suggested to us that the images we found may be part of an email or a Facebook picture. Throughout his interview, denied accessing pornographic websites; however he eventually said that he had viewed pornography on “a computer;” that he traveled a lot; and that he could not recall specific pornographic images that he may have viewed on a “work” computer versus his “personal” computer. further said, “If the images are there and the VA Office of Inspector General 28 Administrative Investigation - Abuse of Authority, Misuse of Position and Resources, Acceptance of Gratuities, and Interference with an IG Investigation National Programs & Special Events, VACO forensics support that, then they must be there.” finally told us that he (b)(6)viewed pornography on the VA computer; that it was “possible” that he viewed it within the past 6 months; but that he could not recall specific dates and times. Edited February 25, 2010 by carlie Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In Memoriam Stretch Posted February 25, 2010 In Memoriam Share Posted February 25, 2010 Diane, has violated the FAR (Federal Aquisition Regulations). She should be banned from Federal Contracting for 5 years. I think that is what the penalty was. StretchJust readin the mail Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence' We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtAFMOB Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 I would suggest that all go to VAwatchdog.org for a complete report on the most recent VACO scandle, porno and contracting are not all what about the 21K Hartman is being accessed for inappropriate use of compensatory time. This jerk should be indicted and then do time. The VAOIG report is worth a complete read. Also the article regarding Chief Justice Roberts comments on the appeals process is worth a read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now