vperl Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Well, lookie here..... Guess others were not happy either..... http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nfmar10/nf030310-3.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berta Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 THANKS_ I just posted this up top in CLaims research - but you beat me to it! I am poed about this IHD situation- I talked to a NVLSP lawyer about it and have accessed the Fed Reg site daily waiting for the regs. Maybe we will discuss this tonight at SVR. I havent found any Hairy Cell B regs or PArkinsons AO regs yet either.The scuttlebutt in the vets advocate communties was that the VA might manipulate somehow what vets they will award IHD AO comp to. This is why those published regs have to be open for Public comment.But the public comment period takes 2-3 months of additional waiting time for vets with IHD who are dying or might be dead now even since the Sec made the announcement. (I gripe anoput this one every chance I get- years ago the VA dropped the receipt of the VSM as denoting Vietnam service.At the same time they tried to drop AO comp of BWN vets who had been awarded due to the VSM on their DD 214. They changed the VSM regulation and never asked for public comments. NVLSP and major vet orgs were really ticked at that one and don't want to see the VA pull anything like that again. We need to see the regs published, open and closed comment period over , and RO thumbs removed from butts to get these claims squared away. AO IHD means Nehmer and many claims will generate lots more retro due some IHD vets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billy2 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Well, lookie here..... Guess others were not happy either..... http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nfmar10/nf030310-3.htm Thanks kid, us oldtimers hope we are still around when these issues are settled. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlie Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 VA delay may stall benefits for Vietnam vets By Kelly Kennedy - Staff writer Posted : Tuesday Mar 2, 2010 9:40:58 EST Three veterans groups have threatened the Veterans Affairs Department with a lawsuit if VA does not publish regulations by March 12 about three Agent Orange-related diseases that the Institute of Medicine has deemed should be presumed connected to military service. Three veterans groups have threatened the Veterans Affairs Department with a lawsuit if VA does not publish regulations by March 12 about three Agent Orange-related diseases that the Institute of Medicine has deemed should be presumed connected to military service. Every two years, the IoM reviews scientific evidence to determine if diseases could have been caused by dioxin, the harmful ingredient in Agent Orange. Agent Orange is an exfoliate widely used during the Vietnam War to clear forests. In its latest review, IoM found that ischemic heart disease, Parkinson’s disease and B-cell leukemias all could be linked to Agent Orange exposure. VA is required by the Agent Orange Act of 1991 to publish a regulation, making veterans eligible for benefits, within 210 days of such findings. In this case, that would have been Feb. 19. VA doesn’t have to pay out benefits until after the regulation is actually published. The American Legion, Military Order of the Purple Heart, and the National Veterans Legal Services Program sent a letter to VA on Monday demanding that the organization publish the regulation by March 12. “VA Secretary [Eric] Shinseki in September agreed to add the three diseases,” said Barton Stichman, joint executive director of the National Veterans Legal Services Program. “But his agency has let him down on paying anyone their benefits.” A VA official said the agency is working to make sure the regulation goes through correctly — and therefore causes no more delays — after severe snow storms in Washington, D.C., shut down the federal government for almost a full week in early February. The official added that veterans could get benefits retroactively, based on a lawsuit filed in 1984. Ian de Planque, the American Legion’s assistant director for veterans affairs and rehabilitation, said the need to get the regulation right could delay veterans benefits until at least late summer. The regulation must be published in the Federal Register, and then go through a public comment period, before veterans can receive any benefits. There has been some debate about the inclusion of ischemic heart disease for presumption of service connection. The science shows that people exposed to dioxin have higher rates of heart disease. However, ischemic heart disease is the number one cause of death in Western countries, and has also been connected to diet and exercise. “Shinseki’s already made the decision,” Stichman said of the possibility that discussion over that issue might contribute to the delay in publishing the new regulations, “so that shouldn’t matter.” De Planque said as many as 200,000 veterans may seek benefits just for heart disease, which could add to the already considerable backlog of VA benefits claims and cause further delays. De Planque recommended that veterans file claims as soon as a possible, and not wait for the regulation to come out. “We still don’t know how broadly or narrowly ischemic heart disease is going to be defined,” de Planque said. “There’s going to be a lot of people affected.” Stichman said VA hasn’t been late with filing an Agent Orange regulation since 1991, when service connection for diabetes was delayed. He said veterans won a court case at the time that awarded retroactive benefits in that instance. http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/03/mili...orange_030110w/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRW Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 The last 9 illnesses added to the Agent-Orange list, have averaged 6 to 9 months from the VA announcement date to the Federal Register implemenation date. This is irregardless of any mandatory time frame that they may be required to go by. I don't think the threat of a lawsuit is going to light a fire under the VA to speed things up. A federal department that is this large, is not going to be intiminated by a lawsuit over their not following certain rules of procedure. That's just not going to happen. Now we may very well not like that (and that includes myself), but it is what it is. So, I would have to say this: patience is a viture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder john999 Posted March 3, 2010 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted March 3, 2010 The VA realizes the astronomical costs they have incurred from making AO heart disease presumptive and are trying to find a way out of this liability. Heart disease is going to kill every one of us Nam vets if we don't die from some other disease like AO cancer. Every time a vet dies from a NSC condition a bell rings in the VA HQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Schmidt Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 The VA realizes the astronomical costs they have incurred from making AO heart disease presumptive and are trying to find a way out of this liability. Heart disease is going to kill every one of us Nam vets if we don't die from some other disease like AO cancer. Every time a vet dies from a NSC condition a bell rings in the VA HQ. I have to agree with you 100% on that comment John. When I had my heart attack, my cardiologist said that i beat the odds. I asked him what he meant by that and he said 50% of the people that have a heart attack die, and the other 50% don't. I'm not looking forward to shooting the dice again. My doc has me come in every 6 months for a checkup. Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
vperl
Well, lookie here.....
Guess others were not happy either.....
http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nfmar10/nf030310-3.htm
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
2
1
1
Popular Days
Mar 3
6
Mar 18
2
Mar 4
1
Mar 17
1
Top Posters For This Question
vperl 2 posts
Sgt Schmidt 2 posts
Berta 1 post
billy2 1 post
Popular Days
Mar 3 2010
6 posts
Mar 18 2010
2 posts
Mar 4 2010
1 post
Mar 17 2010
1 post
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now