Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rating Software

Rate this question


vaf

Question

I know this may not affect most of you, but in the event someday you are hanging by a thread between one rating percentage and another higher one, this will matter. I've posted before, that according to the combined ratings table in 38 CFR, my husband's at 100%. However, we just recently received confirmation through our U.S. Senator that the VARO is using software to compute percentages. In most cases, the results are the same as what is reflected in the table. However, in my husband's case, they are not. The software rounded him down to 90%, and I'm sure this is being done many times over throughout the country to other disabled veterans. You all know the difference this makes, plus, he's retired military and is supposed to be receiving the balance of his military retirement. We wrote the VARO about the discrepancy last February, not realizing that it was a matter of the software being used, instead of the VARO possibly overlooking one of his ratings. We did not receive a response, so once we received the letter from the Senator, we decided to interpret the VARO's silence as a denial, and we filed an NOD earlier this month and requested an SOC in regards to our plan to appeal.

There is no discussion in 38 CFR regarding any software that's been authorized to pre-empt or supercede the actual rating table that is in 38 CFR, Part 4, 4.25. Any software program that has not undergone objective scrutiny through the normal regulatory process involved with making amendments to 38 CFR we hold is invalid. We also argued reasonable doubt being resolved in favor of the veteran.

If this is an issue of interest to anyone, please let me know and we'll keep you posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

It should be of interest to everyone, whether 100% or not, since those with 100% may be looking for that extra 60% for SMCs.

Certainly, the lazy attitude and lack of simple math ability that is being demonstrated here, is a valid point of contention, in that the Table in CFR 38, Chap. 4, is designated as the formal method of calculating ratings.

I think you should file a CUE, as a clear violation of the rules,

Fight the VA as if they are the enemy; for they are!

Erin go Bragh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wally, should we wait for a response from the VARO regarding our NOD, or should we go ahead now and file a CUE with the VARO?

My husband's got a pending CVA hearing, and a lawyer to assist. We were also thinking of asking for a writ of mandamus, but I know these are hardly ever granted.

Which way to go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Dear Vicki:

On the contrary I have seen a Writ of Mandamus move mountains. It lights a fire under the VA asses so to speak cause it makes them give an answer as they don't want to be ordered by Court to do their job.

Wally, should we wait for a response from the VARO regarding our NOD, or should we go ahead now and file a CUE with the VARO?

My husband's got a pending CVA hearing, and a lawyer to assist. We were also thinking of asking for a writ of mandamus, but I know these are hardly ever granted.

Which way to go?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the time frame, roughly? In other words, am I gumming up the works with a writ moreso than I would with a CUE? Would a CUE delay things more than just an NOD followed by an appeal?

We're just getting the claims file back after it being in Washington for two years regarding a now completed Board hearing, and a pending Court hearing, which stopped everything that was filed or pending in the interim. Would we be doing something that would send the file back to Washington for another two years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use