Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

1998 Appeal Won A Remand Of All Issues At Cavc

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

My 1998 appeal won a remand of all issues at CAVC. I just recieved it.

Now to see what the BVA will do. The CAVC judge didn't let them get away with blowing off three favorable medical opinions.

He stated the board must give adequate reasons why these three opinions were given no to little weight or probative value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Allan, V.A.'s capacity to ignore and overlook evidence amazes me. My husband for many years tried to get copies of his C file but those written requests for copies of his C file are now missing from his claims folder. My husband finally filed a form with V.A. requesting that V.A. send copies of his records to his non V.A. psychiatrist. V.A. did send an INCOMPLETE copy of the C file to that psychiatrist six years ago but we didn't learn that until last week. Six years ago husband and I met with that psychiatrist and he graciously gave the box of records to my husband. That box of records yielded one earlier effective date because of clear and unmistakable error concerning new and material evidence received during an appeal period in support of a pending claim under 38 CFR 3.156 and 38 CFR 3.400 (q).

Recently I had my husband sign a written request recently which was sent to a VARO in California for copies of his records. Soon after that written request for records as received by VARO in California, we received a phone call from VARO in Montana, the state where we now live. Early in that recent telephone call the service officer from VARO asked me, "Do you want me to send your husband a copy of his C file? I said no and told him we already had a copy of the C file which had been sent to his doctor. We spoke for a few minutes about some of the issues in his file and including V.A.'s failure to obtain records from a particular hospital in support of his claim and I became increasingly frustrated with his attitude. That V.A. employee's final words to me were, "ARE YOU SURE THAT YOU DON'T WANT ME TO SEND YOUR HUSBAND A COPY OF HIS C FILE?" I suspected he was trying to tell me something and I said, "Sure go ahead and send him a copy." My husband received those records which appear to have an earlier unadjudicated pending claim which V.A. did not make a rating decision on. V.A. gave the veteran [who later became my husband] a deadline of one year to submit evidence in support of it. As far as I know that one year deadline applies only to finally adjudicated claim not pending claims. After that he wait about six years before he filed another claim requesting reevaluation while he was hospitalized for a non service connected disability. The claim explained he was hospitalized then at a particular hospital. The notation for my SCD was added to the claim and it was denied. During the appeal period, V.A. received new and material evidence in support of that claim and years later V.A. received evidence showing he was receiving Social Security Disability when he made the claim and that evidence was considered because of continuous prosecution of the claim [38 CFR 3.400 (Q)]. V.A. had given him a 100% rating back to the date of that second claim but i think that the first claim is still pending. V.A. had made a series of denials after receipt of the second claim despite the fact that the medical evidence of record at the time of each decision stated clearly that this veteran was unemployable. V.A. made the second denial on grounds that the veteran had not provided evidence of a permanent increase in disability when there was no requirement in the rating schedule that required provide evidence of a permanent increase in disability. After the second denial, one of this veteran's doctors sent this veteran a letter stating that he had reviewed records at a particular V.A. hospital and those records showed that his medical condition was so severe that he could not be vocationally rehabilitated. A couple of years later this veteran who was then married to me told V.A. in writing to get copies of his records from that hospital but V.A. never did get those records. I believe that VARO knew those medical records would have supported the earlier pending claim. MY HUSBAND'S MISTAKE WAS NOT MAKING A WRITTEN REQUEST PERSONALLY TO THAT V.A. HOSPITAL FOR COPIES OF HIS RECORDS. HE HAD NEVER DONE THAT UNTIL RECENTLY AND 30 years after that first claim for increase it is unlikely the records in support of that pending claim still exist.

Edited by deltaj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

After I sent the BVA Dr Bash's medical opinions, they claimed he couldn't have reviewed my c-file prior to giving his opinion. According to them in the denial, they claimed I had "NEVER" requested a copy of the c-file.

So I sent the BVA, over a dozen unanswered, written requests starting in 1975 when my American Legion SO requested it. Up to one yr before Dr Bash reviewed the file the VARO just sent me. They had Dr Bash review their copy because "VETS" can alter any records they want, is what my SO informed me.

Dr Bash again stated these are the same records he already reviewed and said his medical opinion was unchanged. So they did what they always do, they Dr shopped for another opinion they wanted from one of their staff consultants. Dr bash sent in another IMO stating their consultant doesn't come close to having his training and expertice and explained in even more medical rational why my issues are service connected. The Judge pointed out they have to except all the favorable evidence or be specific why they don't.

I hope it ties their hands, but we all know the VA raters can do as they damn well please and deny till you die. Letting us die fighting appeals is their way of saving funding.

The excuse of backlogs, is how they cover their butts for their dishonerable treatment of veterans in this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • You have to win it at this step. I hope they pay you back to the beginning when you applied, and not have to "Make a Deal." and settle for 1 yr retro vs over 6 yrs. Take it now 100% P&T and disappear and never file another claim ever, or we will hold you up with exams forever and denials...I hope No one ever has to make this decision, especially YOU!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats!!!

Operation Iraqi Freedom 07-08

40% lower back, 10% migraines, 10% depression, 10% dermatitis 0% residuals of right foot, 0% esophagitis & 0% hypertension

"To care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow, and his orphan"

- Abraham Lincoln

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use